Nominations for 10 Super Stations
Thread Starter
Nominations for 10 Super Stations
As the White Paper obviously spells doom for the Service as we know it, reducing manning to about 40,000, 10 flying stn's, half the original order for Typhoon, early OSD for Jaguar etc; who'd like to place bets on the stns' we'll have left?
St Mawgan, Brize Norton, Cottesmore, Marham, Coningsby, Waddington, Valley, Cranwell (& Barkston) Leuchars and Lossiemouth would be my bet!
Give it 10 years and most MOBs in UK will be almost purely civilianized and we'll then simply have Sqn's and TAC everything else!
There is one good thing that'll come out of it though! We'll be getting rid of one heck of a lot of scribblies!
St Mawgan, Brize Norton, Cottesmore, Marham, Coningsby, Waddington, Valley, Cranwell (& Barkston) Leuchars and Lossiemouth would be my bet!
Give it 10 years and most MOBs in UK will be almost purely civilianized and we'll then simply have Sqn's and TAC everything else!
There is one good thing that'll come out of it though! We'll be getting rid of one heck of a lot of scribblies!
whowhenwhy
You obviuosly haven't been in the RAF very long. I have no doubt it will be the scribblies who decides who goes, and it won't be them. Especially not after the success of the 'tactical scribblies' in the latest Gulf War.
I also predict that we will lose almost no officers of Air Rank. I believe (much in the same way that the NHS has more managers than hospital beds) we already have enough engineering officers to have a Sqn Ldr Eng in charge of every aircraft engine in the RAF!!!
Let the average JO take some pruning shears to the RAF and we will save you a fortune with no change in capability!!
You obviuosly haven't been in the RAF very long. I have no doubt it will be the scribblies who decides who goes, and it won't be them. Especially not after the success of the 'tactical scribblies' in the latest Gulf War.
I also predict that we will lose almost no officers of Air Rank. I believe (much in the same way that the NHS has more managers than hospital beds) we already have enough engineering officers to have a Sqn Ldr Eng in charge of every aircraft engine in the RAF!!!
Let the average JO take some pruning shears to the RAF and we will save you a fortune with no change in capability!!
You could be right Biggus about the numbers of Engineer Officers per engine. However, before we go overboard, worth bearing in mind that I think we have just under 6000 aircrew (of all flavours) for around 920 powered aircraft!!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course if we scrapped all the aircraft types and bases just think of how much money we would save to spend on scribblies.
Didnt the PM BLiar say in an interview that there would be no troop cuts?
Didnt the PM BLiar say in an interview that there would be no troop cuts?
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Super Stations?
I reckon Valley, Waddo, Coningsby, Marham, Honington, Cranwell, Innsworth, Kinloss, Lossiemouth and Brize.
Oh and er Scampton, for Tac Blah and the CRC.
You're all Really Useful Engines!
Oh and er Scampton, for Tac Blah and the CRC.
You're all Really Useful Engines!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Well we're obviously talking frontline flying stations here then:
Brize - Trucky/AAR world
Kinloss - Nimrod and FMPA (let's face MRA4 is not gonna happen)
Waddo - ISTAR bods, is there enough room for MPA as well??
Marham - GR4 mafia
Coningsby - Typhoon blah
Leuchars - More Typhoon blah
Cotesmore - Harrier gang and then JSF?
Lossie - Move all fixed wing flying trg here?
That leaves 2 spare for anything unforseen, like we actually get the numbers they are now saying......hmmmm
Brize - Trucky/AAR world
Kinloss - Nimrod and FMPA (let's face MRA4 is not gonna happen)
Waddo - ISTAR bods, is there enough room for MPA as well??
Marham - GR4 mafia
Coningsby - Typhoon blah
Leuchars - More Typhoon blah
Cotesmore - Harrier gang and then JSF?
Lossie - Move all fixed wing flying trg here?
That leaves 2 spare for anything unforseen, like we actually get the numbers they are now saying......hmmmm
DuckDodgers,
To add to your reason for Marham being one of the ten - it's right next door to Sandringham. When I was at Marham many years ago it was muted that for that reason alone i.e. convenience of the Royals, it would likely never close.
To add to your reason for Marham being one of the ten - it's right next door to Sandringham. When I was at Marham many years ago it was muted that for that reason alone i.e. convenience of the Royals, it would likely never close.
Red Line Entry
I would be the first to agree that we have too many senior aircrew officers, S/L and above, sitting in MOD for 20+ years doing b#*gger all. I would be more than happy to get rid of some of them. However, lets take your numbers, 6000 aircrew for 920 aircraft.
First of all that works out at 6.5 aircrew per aircraft. Let us assume that the average crew per aircraft is 3 (standard fast jet, Tornado, being 2 man, but the single seaters, Jag, Harrier, etc being offset by the big crewed multis E-3D, VC-10, C-130 etc to such an extent as to drag the average above 2). After all there are as many C-130s as Jags!
Then allow a ratio of a minimum of 1.5 crews per aircraft to keep them flying continually in wartime (BA work on 6-7 crews per jet to keep them going!! When I was last at Lyneham there were 100 crews for 50 a/c, but that was a few years ago!). This gives us a minimum of 4.5 aircrew per aircraft. This means we have 1840 aircrew too many, which probably equates to the manning of MOD and Mod PE! As I said before, cut away!!
I would be the first to agree that we have too many senior aircrew officers, S/L and above, sitting in MOD for 20+ years doing b#*gger all. I would be more than happy to get rid of some of them. However, lets take your numbers, 6000 aircrew for 920 aircraft.
First of all that works out at 6.5 aircrew per aircraft. Let us assume that the average crew per aircraft is 3 (standard fast jet, Tornado, being 2 man, but the single seaters, Jag, Harrier, etc being offset by the big crewed multis E-3D, VC-10, C-130 etc to such an extent as to drag the average above 2). After all there are as many C-130s as Jags!
Then allow a ratio of a minimum of 1.5 crews per aircraft to keep them flying continually in wartime (BA work on 6-7 crews per jet to keep them going!! When I was last at Lyneham there were 100 crews for 50 a/c, but that was a few years ago!). This gives us a minimum of 4.5 aircrew per aircraft. This means we have 1840 aircrew too many, which probably equates to the manning of MOD and Mod PE! As I said before, cut away!!
Let the average JO take some pruning shears to the RAF and we will save you a fortune with no change in capability!!
If you had said however let a sensible Flt Sgt or WO sort it out then you would get results.The top ten are fairly obvious with assorted chopper ops dotted around but I've heard that Marham is touted to be the second/third line Tornado (GR&F) base and all the GR operations are to run from Lossie (note no use of the sqn word)
Of course it's all rumours
ps did anyone hear about Marham running out of money this year?
see above
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Northolt (for much the same reason as Marham)
Benson - the station that refused to die...
Alcatraz South Seas...'cos the Bennies don't want the Argies to sh@g their sheep
RAF Club, Piccadilly, will become HQ Steak n' Kidney Pie Grp
Boscombe - 'cos for years there's going to be a f**k of a lot of sorting-out work on Typhoon
And a bunch of stations connected by the A-1 vital to solo-stude navigation confusion...some of them manned solely by rock-apes.
Benson - the station that refused to die...
Alcatraz South Seas...'cos the Bennies don't want the Argies to sh@g their sheep
RAF Club, Piccadilly, will become HQ Steak n' Kidney Pie Grp
Boscombe - 'cos for years there's going to be a f**k of a lot of sorting-out work on Typhoon
And a bunch of stations connected by the A-1 vital to solo-stude navigation confusion...some of them manned solely by rock-apes.
Short Blunt Shock
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can bet that all 10 will be Stns that we have previously closed down as being 'surplus to requirements' (Scampton / Church Fenton, anyone??), that they will all need extensive building work to bring them up to the latest Commune of Europe regulations against offensive smells in the workplace, and they will all be nowhere near anywhere that people will actually want to live (Scotland, Oxford and East Anglia anyone??) - thus solving the 'compulsory redundacy' problem at a stroke, whilst costing more than the alleged 'savings' required by the White Paper to 'modernise' our defences. Genius, as always, brought to you , as always, by the Retired CND Members Refuge, otherwise known as the 'Labour Party'. Never mind, maybe all those left jobless by the changes should try to run the wrong way through the channel tunnel, pick up a couple of random kids on the way and destroy their passports, claiming the only english word they know is 'Asylum' - BINGO! - £30k a year in benefits, a free house, and F&*k all chance of ever being sent anywhere remotely dangerous!