Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New Helicopter For Sar Force

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New Helicopter For Sar Force

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Oct 2003, 03:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lichfield UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Danes don't operate Sea Kings at all!!! They have been one of the few miltary operators of the Sikorsky S61 for over 2 decades. Ok at the end of the day its a Sea King but lets be accurate!
hairyclameater is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2003, 06:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keepin It In Trim – The hoist on the 101 is in a crap position on the RN and RAF variant. You can get the cable to scrape down the sponson and aircraft side quite nicely if you don’t pay attention (ie fight the cable), but I thought the Canadians ditched the silly swing out hydraulic hoist and had twin electric hoists mounted over the middle of the door? This may have changed from last time I heard anything about it.

I know their was a mod to make the swing out hoist come out and round further, and it had a bracing strut of some description, but I left before it got fitted. Bet you still couldn’t get a stretcher in though. You could also use the wheel as a hand hold to stop yourself spinning, which is handy if your trying to get the stretcher around the sponson and in through the door.

The only thing I ever lifted was big bags of lead shot, and that was difficult enough with the positioning of door/sponson/hoist, I wouldn't like to try it with a live bod on the end.
Straight Up Again is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2003, 23:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Griffin appears to be a success in Akr however it was careless of the people at Valley to lose one of their skids whilst airborne. If you want wheels then just ask.
KPax is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2003, 23:30
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North of somewhere south
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reading between the lines and looking from the situation from one end of the med, I would suggest that the Griffin in Cyprus is far from a success. It no doubt will be, but it will take a couple of years and no doubt a shed load of cash to sort it out, and we only have the aircraft for 5 years anyway.

as far as I understand you cannot get 2 ejectee casualties on board in stretchers and then work on them for 1/2 hour that would be required if collecting someone from the furthest point that the fast jets operate. Surely that makes the aircraft either:

a: unsuitable for SAR as the RAF practise it.

b: unsuitable for purpose at the moment and therefore has no business holding aSAR standby until these issues have been resolved.

I guess, like the Sea King Force, once you start living with it then you will be stuck with it for many years to come.

Fortunately for the SARF the MRT stretchers will not fit in the aircraft anyway, so it will be F*** all use over here.
OOPS 78 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 00:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sunny Florida, USA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down EH101 for SAR?

As somebody who was recently winched out of the sea (as part of a drill) by a Merlin helicopter I can vouch that it was not at all a pleasant experience. I was faced with a vicious sea chop that almost upturned me a few times, I could not keep my eyes open against the 150mph spray and it as the aircraft was winching from such a high hover (using the auto hover from the back door) it took 15 minutes to eventually snare me in the strop!

The Merlin has a great number of attributes that are being succesfully used across the SH and HM Fleet, but it does have shortfalls as a SAR aircraft, despite the claimed success of Cormorant! The requirements for the future SAR aircraft need to be carefully crafted - 2 different aircraft types may well be the answer but support costs must increase. It will no doubt be an interesting debate!
The Ferret is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 01:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Second star on the left
Posts: 124
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Dear OOPs

Don't know where you got your information about the Griffin from, but you are a little acerbic for one with so little fact and so much rumour. Speak to the guys on the Sqn and get the facts, it isn't a perfect solution but it could have been an awful lot worse. You can pick up 2 ejectees and work on them, but not as well as in some of the other platforms in service. You pays your money and put up with the restrictions. You don't get a Rolls Royce solution for Nissan prices.

Heads down, look out for the flack.
Cabe LeCutter is online now  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 02:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chatting to 84 Sqn boys a few weeks ago I hear that 30% of the below stairs bods are off sick with back complaints.

With an attrition rate like that, they'll be vacancies for stop-gap detachees in no time at all.

Just a rumour, but from the horse's mouth.
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2003, 06:08
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ferret - I can also vouch for the strength of downdraft, having had to move from well outside the downwash to directly underneath for ext PA testing, a/c in 60 ft hover. It gets very difficult to walk forwards, almost to the point of being impossible. But, much like a hurricane, it gets suddenly easier near the underneath. I have also watched others try to do this (from the comfort of looking through the RAF variant floor), so it wasn't just me being lardy and unfit.

Did they manage to get you in without banging into the sponson, or using the wheel as a handy support?

I know wind speed measurements in the downwash were done, but haven't got a clue what the results were.
Straight Up Again is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2003, 17:38
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: forward of zone19
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How did the 84 guys enjoy their little trip to the desert? I heard they had a "cracking" time.
Or are those stories just rumours too?
force_ale is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2003, 20:14
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: South of the border
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This new rotary ac, is it under the title SABR (Support Amphibious Battlefield Rotorcraft) replacing Sea King and Puma?
donald stott is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2003, 20:35
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the last public statement from the UK SAR Helicopter Harmonisation and Procurement Steering Group in July 2002 was that:

"To date, no decision has been made on whether the MCA and MoD will jointly acquire a future SAR capability;
To date, no decision has been made on whether PFI or conventional acquisition is more appropriate for the procurement of the future UK SAR capability."

According to the DPA web site:
"PFI remains an option for Training and all, or part, of the SAR requirement."
zalt is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2003, 23:12
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sunny Florida, USA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish Pick Up!

Straight up Again - Amazingly they did manage to get me into the cabin without smashing me into either the sponson or the wheels - maybe it would have been different if there were twin wheels on this particular variant but don't get me started on that one! There was alot of fending off though and it was not a particularly confortable ride as the strop had not been properly placed in the small of my back before lifting - probably due to the massive amount of spray preventing good vision! At least I live to tell the tale!
The Ferret is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.