Hoons next??
Do I sniff the aroma of a no-confidence vote and a demand for a General Election, perchance?
Memo to B.Liar: "Full opposite foot and control column centrally forward until your spin stops. Then $od off!"
Memo to B.Liar: "Full opposite foot and control column centrally forward until your spin stops. Then $od off!"
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So get Labour out. What's the alternative ?
I think it's even scarier . . . . . . . . .
Don't get me wrong. I'm no New Labour groupie but there seems to be little else out there.
At the end of the day (besides getting dark) it would mean that we'd be slagging some other Defence Secretary off in six months time.
Us being the cynics we are or them being less than perfect ?
I think it's even scarier . . . . . . . . .
Don't get me wrong. I'm no New Labour groupie but there seems to be little else out there.
At the end of the day (besides getting dark) it would mean that we'd be slagging some other Defence Secretary off in six months time.
Us being the cynics we are or them being less than perfect ?
Inter Arma Enim Silentius Lex Legis
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FFP
I don't know, you know there are some good guys and gals out there in the labour party. Admittedly mostly on the very back benches!!
Perhaps we could have a girlie in charge this time. Have we ever had a girlie Defence Secretary??
Let's be honest, she couldn't make any more of a mess than all the tw@ts we have had since sleepy fred!!
I don't know, you know there are some good guys and gals out there in the labour party. Admittedly mostly on the very back benches!!
Perhaps we could have a girlie in charge this time. Have we ever had a girlie Defence Secretary??
Let's be honest, she couldn't make any more of a mess than all the tw@ts we have had since sleepy fred!!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe so, but I feel that with the office comes politics (funny old thing !!) which means we won't/can't get the type of leadership we would all like.
Or maybe the position changes people. Who knows. . . . .
Or maybe the position changes people. Who knows. . . . .
Having got rid of the leader of his country and then been faced with a bunch of blithering idiots, his one time supporters, who couldn't recognize a decent decision if it slapped them heartily in the face, a man called Cromwell took his troops into Parliament and declared martial law. Bring on the revolution!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If our political masters abuse their power (hardly a new phenomenon), it is because our dog's breakfast of a constitution allows them to do so. The Prime Minister is de facto president and the only real check on his or her power (apart from a general election or an all-out backbench or Cabinet revolt) is the media. Is it any wonder, therefore, that government becomes obsessed with presentation? Hoon is no better or worse than his predecessors in the job.
As for martial law, all that does is replace a bunch of competing political egos with a bunch of competing military egos. And we all know what happens when military egos compete, don't we, boys and girls?
As for martial law, all that does is replace a bunch of competing political egos with a bunch of competing military egos. And we all know what happens when military egos compete, don't we, boys and girls?
Hmmm, I wonder who that is at the door? Oh dear, lots of people in sunglasses with false ingratiating smiles and ridiculous sweeping hand gestures! What can I do? Oh I know, I'll mention the fact that I'm a personal friend of Carol Caplin. Hold on!
Yep, that did the trick, they left some incense burners and departed muttering something about their next appoinment being with Buff. Don't know who they were talking about though.
Yep, that did the trick, they left some incense burners and departed muttering something about their next appoinment being with Buff. Don't know who they were talking about though.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Too close to Pompey
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try this link (if it worked) to Patrick Mercer, ex-WFR . http://www.politicallinks.co.uk/poli...io.asp?id=0418
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Area 51
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What bugs me is the constant reference to Buff-hoon and others as 'former barristers', as if this makes them some kind of superbeing.
The reason is that any barrister worth his salt wouldn't become an MP, they simply wouldn't take such a huge pay cut! Waht we need are people who have lived a little and had successful careers, not second rate lawyers who make second rate politicians.
The reason is that any barrister worth his salt wouldn't become an MP, they simply wouldn't take such a huge pay cut! Waht we need are people who have lived a little and had successful careers, not second rate lawyers who make second rate politicians.
Is it me, or are we stepping towards saying that government really should be for the people, by the people. Intelligent, landed, moneyed and experienced people doing the job. You know, like we used to before the current (last 30-40 years worth) lot who seem to believe that you can have a 'career' in politics. Maybe we could introduce some dis-incentives like, for instance, MPs don't get a wage. They have a certain capped allowance each year for expenses. For those with jobs in Government those allowances could be increased somewhat to account for their increased need to base themselves in the capital. Just an idea??? 
Labour annual conference, coming up in October - just after the Hutton 2nd pass and in time for the report. Watch this space....(noting that he's desperately trying to make up to the unions...)
Sorry, didn't mean to suggest that we should'ban' the poor, I simply included a list of possible criteria. I know a lot of 'poor' people who are incredibly intelligent. Many of them are junior ranks within the forces!! Of course at the other end of the spectrum you have people who are poor because they own huge big leaky castles!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: City of Culture
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe we should pick income band that people need to reach before they can vote. How about a nice round figure like £40,000 a year.
A Civilian: Offical prat correspondent.
A Civilian: Offical prat correspondent.