Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK Stick Time

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK Stick Time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2015, 07:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: gutter
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK Stick Time

Trolling through the various threads I have noticed a few people mentioning a change to flight time calculation at EK. It seems to validate what I've been told as well.

My source tells me that EK is pushing for only stick time that will count towards your flight time. So basically if your operating any sector with augmenting crew, you only get time credit for being in the seat.

I think there will be an FCI defining the new procedure as Royally Augmented.
lowstandard is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 07:37
  #2 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,881
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
So that is how they are going to try and do it.
SOPS is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 07:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In the seat
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The CARS refer to block time only so I'm not sure how they'll get that one right! But there again, they do get "indirect" aid!
kingpost is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 08:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dubai
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are operating a flight with augmenting crew, 100% of block time counts as stick time. During ops as augmenting crew, only time spent in the seat as reported in the VR counts towards stick time.

If you want to keep track of block vs. stick time, take a look at the formatting of the new flight time report, there are separate fields for block and stick time. Going forward, how this will be applied in terms of FTLs is anyone's guess.
scandistralian is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 11:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Goodluck to them trying to be EASA a compliant with that interpretation
falconeasydriver is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 17:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares. The only question you should be asking about how flight time is interpreted is

-How does Korean Airlines view it?
-How does China Southern view it?
-How does JAL view it?
-How does Vietnam Airlines view it?
-How does Asiana view it?
-How does Norwegian Long Haul view it?
-How do the US majors view it?

...etc

Get your time, get out. Rats, sinking ships, yadada
nolimitholdem is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2015, 02:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sand Box
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The OMA is clear regarding the FTLs. Only time in the seat is applied towards the 100 & 900hr limits. For example, I did 4 ULRs within a 28 day period (overlapping into another calendar month), all of which I was the operating captain one of the legs. Using Scandistralian's interpretation, I would have exceeded the 100hrs in that period. Not how the OMA states it, nor how the company interprets it, unfortunately.
Curry Goat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.