Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK logging of bunk time to change

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK logging of bunk time to change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd February 2014 | 04:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Over there
EK logging of bunk time to change

Hi all,

Heard a rumour that currently EK drivers don't log time in the bunk but that rule is about to change? Any truth to this? If so what are the implications of this? Start accrediting overtime pay or hire more pilots?
Beatsaregularjob is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2014 | 12:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
From: Gulf playing Golf
You must have heard wrong. Only the commander of the flight can log all the time. The first officer cannot log bunk time towards his upgrade. Sort of makes sense to me.
Payscale is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2014 | 12:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Hasn't this rumour been going round since 1985?!
thehonourablefong is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2014 | 12:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Kapitanleutnant
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This one might have some legs due to the new EASA rules to come into effect later this year from what I hear….

K
 
Reply
Old 23rd February 2014 | 15:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: New England
Why doesn't Emirates just do the right thing instead of running an illegal operation? They are above the law.
new tomcat is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2014 | 15:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Which countries laws are they breaking Tom?

You realize you would be breaking European law with your operation if it applied to you?
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2014 | 16:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Expat land
Somewhat true, I think

True, this change will come in at some stage and will require some additional pilots (source: one of the Training Managers I spoke to recently).

However, it won't change the hours you log in your logbook (yes, EK pilots log hours in the bunk, like most long haul airlines). The difference is Emirates doesn't count bunk hours for the augmenting (cruise) Capt and F/O towards flight & duty limits. That's it. They do for flight experience records.

So it won't affect your hours for upgrade, or for another job, or your pay (yes you get paid for all bunk hours too). If you're not sure, have a look at your flying records on the portal and see how many hours you have according to the company.

More pilots will be required as the 900/year limit will be broken by some ULR regulars (but that could well go to 1000/year with the change, I hear), plus a few rostering complications, but not so big a deal really.
Avid Aviator is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 10:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: New England
How about the 900 hour a year limit Wiz?
What other airline flies over the limit?
new tomcat is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 12:47
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
And the way that 900hrs is calculated is laid out in our Regulator Approved manual, and is adhered to.

I'm not saying I like it, it sucks and will hopefully be changed, but it is legal by the laws EK is subject to.

I have no idea if other UAE airlines do the same (Well, the unmentionable would be the only other one with Augmented ops), but if they presented their OMA to the GCAA with the same clause, and the GCAA approved it, their operation would be legal.

What you don't understand (well, one of the MYRIAD of things you don't understand) is that here- as in the WHOLE OF EUROPE- FTLs are a matter of individual operators having FTL schemes included in their manuals, and those manuals being approved.

As to other airlines going over 900hrs?

Well, lets start with all the Australian Airlines who are approved to go to 1000hrs, all the European ones who do likewise (and, it seems, EASA is about to make that universal) or......

All the US operators who are able to legally do 1200hrs under the FARs, on far shorter rest periods than are mandatory here (even AFTER your recent change).

Guess they're all operating illegally, huh?
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 13:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: New England
First of all the FAA limits airlines to 1000 hours.
In addition to that no airline get close to the limit. After all you don't run your car at Red Line why would an airline run it's pilots at Red Line unless they are inviting disaster.
You are right I don't understand why or how pilots allow the things that happen to them to carry on. I know in the sand you have no rights and have the contract to prove it but Europe? They have strong unions, stronger even then in the US.
new tomcat is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 14:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: i'm in the parking lot
any one hear the cvr from the ups crash in BHM? is it true the cvr caught both pilot's yawning and the CA said in a earlier sector "this trip will kill me...?"


I haven't heard it myself.....
The Turtle is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 14:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Tom, Guess you've never heard of Ryanair then.

Turtle- Ah! But that's freight! freight pilots, like regional pilots and..well...anyone who isn't Tom doesn't count, you see.....
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 16:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: Hades.
And the way that 900hrs is calculated is laid out in our Regulator Approved manual, and is adhered to.
Which is in total contravention of the UAE CARs (available online).
helen-damnation is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 16:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Actually, since the recent amendment and insertion of the word "Block" as a definition of hours, you are probably right- but it is now in the hands of the regulator to require amendment of the OMA- this is what the OP was saying and was probably right- it was just Tom that was wrong- but he makes a habit of that.

Last edited by Wizofoz; 25th February 2014 at 16:44.
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 19:42
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: Hades.
To be honest I'm not sure how much difference the "block" makes.

The definition of flight time, IIRC, is brake off to brake on (or chocks). The CARs never made any allowance for factoring other than for time claimed to obtain an ATPL as mentioned above.

The UK CAA were approached by a UK company about it but European law prevented it. They weren't happy about it in any case.

The local story was allegedly that Etihad applied for factoring but were turned down, EK having grandfather rights but supposedly time (un)limited!
helen-damnation is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2014 | 20:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Miami
New Tomcat, please speak for yourself and may be for the Airline you work for.
I flew in the old USA for 15 years and I blocked more than 900 hrs almost every year.
spanishfly69 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2014 | 01:46
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
h-d,

Yes, but there is a separate definition in the CARS -"Flight deck duty time" which specifies time in an operating position.

On THAT definition, they would be entitled to count NO bunk time- so at to moment we have sort of an amalgam.

BUT, Block hours are defined as chocks off to chocks on, so I can't see any way around them having to change- but I'm sure they'll try for later rater than sooner!!
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2014 | 13:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Texas, America !
"BUT, Block hours are defined as chocks off to chocks on, so I can't see any way around them having to change- but I'm sure they'll try for later rater than sooner!"

+++++++++++++++++++++++


Omniscient Wiz....it depends on what part of the world you happen to be in and whom you work for. ACARS brake release is used by many, DGS docking systems that measure actual A/C movement by others. Wheel chocks? Not so much anymore.

BTW, TCat is correct. In the USA, 1,000 hrs "block" time is the max, not 1,200.
jacjetlag is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2014 | 19:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
"Chocks on/off" is nomenclature for starting-stopping motion, NOT the actual placing or removing of chocks. Do you still log "Stick time"? When was the last time you were behind an actual stick??

BTW, TCat is correct. In the USA, 1,000 hrs "block" time is the max, not 1,200.
Pax major airline? sure.

How about freight, commuter or part 121 charter?

In OTHER parts of the world, fatigue is considered a bad thing no matter what you fly.
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2014 | 10:38
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: New England
So the way Emirates works it's pilots fatigue is not a concern or problem?
Freight and cummuter pilots work 1000 hours max in the US. This is a FAA rule and as I said before no pilot flies close to that number.
new tomcat is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.