Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Styoopid airline executives!

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Styoopid airline executives!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2014, 11:56
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
Exactly. Pity all those pilots that lost their jobs with airlines that have flown the 747. I'm sure that those airlines that have gone under, did so because they flew four engine aircraft. Maybe we should begin flying only one engine aircraft....think of the savings.
But when all those airlines were flying the 747, all their COMPETITORS were ALSO
flying 747s- note how many airlines have or are in the process of getting rid of the old girl entirely, and the current sales figures of two v four engined aircraft.

It was a great aeroplane in it's time, but it had four engines because there were no ETOPs when it was conceived, nor were their any engines with enough thrust to make it a twin.

EK seems to love the whale, and if it keeps making money, great.

But it does so in spite of having four engines, not because of it.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2014, 15:26
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dubai
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and.....and....and.....my dad can beat up your dad.....

Who gives a ....
LearBus is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2014, 16:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
While I agree that the A v B debate can get a bit childish at times, might I also point out that I don't get why so many people think it is beneath them to discuss aeroplanes and flying on an Aviation website?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2014, 18:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Top of the World
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People are willing to pay a surcharge to fly on the A380. So if this offsets additional fuel burn, economically it works?
Xulu is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2014, 13:02
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere out there
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The novelty factor of the A380 is starting to wear off and the project itself was over budget and over timeline, EADS have openly stated that if it breaks even they will be satisfied.

Right now you cannot lease one(although that is rumoured to be changing soon), there are no second-hand ones for a good price and with the exception of Transaero, no one is really looking at a high-density LOPA.

Most people in the asset side of the business know that EK was gifted two of them plus a free A318 bizjet for one of the Sheikhs just to keep the deal from derailing. I wonder why it took Akhbar in DOH so long to buy some...

The seat/mile economics are wonderful - if you almos fill it but with it's higher operating costs I would wonder what the break-even loadfactor is on it.
ShinjukuHustler is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.