Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Two-hundred and seventy-five 777X ?

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Two-hundred and seventy-five 777X ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Apr 2013, 04:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two-hundred and seventy-five 777X ?

Emirates Asks Boeing for 777 Successor Specs Before Making Order - Bloomberg

Discuss

Last edited by Mr Good Cat; 18th Apr 2013 at 04:17.
Mr Good Cat is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2013, 04:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
275....
falconeasydriver is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2013, 05:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Pretty compelling payload range numbers if specs already published are to be believed.
tartare is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2013, 16:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they will need at least 500 once the new Dubai World airport opens up with 6-7 runways.... Don't stop at 275!!!!!

What would this do to the A350 order? Kill it?
Iver is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 08:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny, isn't it, when Boeing dresses up an ageing girl with a new pair of boots and feathers it's hailed as a winner, perhaps even able to knock the clean-sheet competitor off its peg, but when Airbus did the same with the A330 it was shot down from nearly all sides, primarily because it was deemed uncompetitive against the clean-sheet from Seattle.

With that in mind, it is worth remembering that EK, along with a lot of other airlines, were sort of hot on the A330neo too, until they started becoming more hot on Toulouse doing a clean-sheet design instead that is. We all know what happened next, and I for one will not be surprised if the happens here; all it really takes is for Airbus to start muttering about an A350-1100 and it's game over.
SMT Member is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 08:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eternal Beach
Posts: 1,086
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many 777's now?
All need replacing at some stage, plus add for the future.
Plenty of freighters in that as well.
EMD must have over over 60,000 on her by now.

halas
halas is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 10:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: universe
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before anyone gets too excited about the 777X have a look at the timeline. It's not going to be available for at LEAST another 7 years.
Boeing spent 2010 and 2011 honing its concept for the three-member 777X-family aircraft as a competitive response to the larger Airbus A350-900 and -1000. Boeing envisages the concept's firm configuration being established in 2015, flying in late 2017 or 2018 and entering service by 2019.
vfenext is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 11:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Well, for better or worse, I'll likely be around to fly it

What is the whisper about MORE A380 all about? Anyone heard anything semi-official?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 12:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hades.
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EMD must have over over 60,000 on her by now.
Believe it's now about 68,000
helen-damnation is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 13:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any truth in the rumour that the 330's are going to FlyDubai?
Tower Ranger is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 15:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know the UAE is swimming with oil money, but how the hell can any sensible airline justify the purchase of 275 B777s?! Its crazy. Its just not economically viable... is it?

Only eight airlines on the planet have a TOTAL fleet size above 275.
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 15:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Gatwick
Age: 54
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is the aftermarket

If EK continues its policy of retiring aircraft at 15 years what does that do to the aftermarket and the residual values of these aircraft?

Boeing say the economic life of the aircraft is still 22-25 years old
Travelman Africa is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 15:45
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know the UAE is swimming with oil money, but how the hell can any sensible airline justify the purchase of 275 B777s?! Its crazy. Its just not economically viable... is it?

Only eight airlines on the planet have a TOTAL fleet size above 275.
Abu Dhabi may be swimming with oil money, but Dubai most definitely is not... They have almost NO natural resources hence the reason the city is marketing itself as a tourist and business hub.

Emirates is not the national airline of the UAE and is not owned by the government of the UAE. It is financed by a combination of the Dubai royal family and good business.

This myth about endless oil money being used just to make the biggest order for one's image is getting rather old now... Emirates aircfraft are nearly always full and I'm sure if they could get more aircraft more quickly they would, knowing that they could make even more money to fund the expansion plans.

Mr Good Cat is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 15:54
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny, isn't it, when Boeing dresses up an ageing girl with a new pair of boots and feathers it's hailed as a winner, perhaps even able to knock the clean-sheet competitor off its peg, but when Airbus did the same with the A330 it was shot down from nearly all sides, primarily because it was deemed uncompetitive against the clean-sheet from Seattle.

With that in mind, it is worth remembering that EK, along with a lot of other airlines, were sort of hot on the A330neo too, until they started becoming more hot on Toulouse doing a clean-sheet design instead that is. We all know what happened next, and I for one will not be surprised if the happens here; all it really takes is for Airbus to start muttering about an A350-1100 and it's game over.
I thought this thread may turn into an A vs B bitch-scrap

The reason Airbus canned the original beef-up of the A330 was that airlines wanted a fuselage cross-section similar in size to the 777.

The 777 already has the cabin width they want, and the -X is essentially a longer 777 fuselage with brand new wings, engines and tail.... and possibly a 787 avionics suite as the two already share a common rating.

Therefore you could say it is pretty-much a clean sheet, not a revamp. I'm sure the reason they want to keep the 777 branding tag is the success of the original 777 which has turned out to be the most successful large passenger aircraft built.

Makes sense to me!
Mr Good Cat is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 16:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FAO Mr Good Cat

I bow to your superior knowledge - I've never been to Dubai, although I'm going there next March.

I don't doubt that EK are filling their aircraft but this would more than double their existing fleet. They currently operate 117 B777 aircraft. Are the number of routes that could be served, viable?
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2013, 19:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
I don't doubt that EK are filling their aircraft but this would more than double their existing fleet. They currently operate 117 B777 aircraft. Are the number of routes that could be served, viable?
Well, people said 50 aircraft wouldn't be viable, but here we are-

I attended a breifing once with a strategic planning guy- his story was he'd worked for BA, been tasked with looking at how much of a threat this upstart airline Emirates was and, no doing the sums, promptly applied for a job with them!

HIS story was they saw a market from the region of 650 Widebodies, and that more than half of them shold be EK.

I believe the suits believe we should be a 350 aircraft Airline.

Is that viable? Dunno, WAY above my paygrade- but they HAVE been right most of the time up till now.

Getting them through the airspace, onto a runway and then parking them somewhere might be a different story, however.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2013, 16:17
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz

I believe the suits believe we should be a 350 aircraft Airline.

Is that viable? Dunno, WAY above my paygrade- but they HAVE been right most of the time up till now.
In his speech at the celebration of 75 years of open skies between the UAE and UK, Tim Clark said that EK's expansion was about halfway there - so a 350 aircraft fleet would be about right.
Jet II is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2013, 08:58
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: anytown
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK, EY, QR, whathaveyou, all of 'em expanding their fleets at breathtaking rates, all of them sharing the same airspace.
From what I hear it's already a nightmare for traffic controllers and flight crews at peak time. How long can one stay competitive in today's cut-throat markets when you have to lug around ( and use ) ever increasing quantities of holding fuel ?
stallspeed is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2013, 11:59
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hours.

We have an industry best break-even load factor of 62%, roughly 10% lower than our viable competitors.
fliion is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2013, 18:53
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fliion
Hours.

We have an industry best break-even load factor of 62%, roughly 10% lower than our viable competitors.
Sorry fellah... Missing what you're saying here. What percentage of what?
White Knight is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.