Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

A good nights sleep at LHR? Not with EK

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

A good nights sleep at LHR? Not with EK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Apr 2012, 11:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Touched a nerve eih?

Who talks about pax? Logically a dugong carries more.
I was talking about aircraft per minute, and that is the issue. The competition flying a narrow one doesn't give a hoot about how many you carry, they want to land and not wait longer behind a dugong.
Dubai has shown to start the bad habit of taking these biggies ahead of others and it starts creating some boiling blood ....

By the way, I do know about the performance issue of 2 vs. 4 engined aircraft. That's why I know that the 4 legged ones fly lower for the first couple of miles. Low means more noise, at least that's what the folks under the first few miles hear. Decibels vanish astonishingly fast with altitude and they stay annoyingly present at lower ones ......

As for the landing distance and steep approach capability, I do have to trust you.
glofish is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 16:38
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dugong driver:

That's what I meant: I touched your own mentioned nerve ....

Look, nobody is denying that the dugong has a good noise certificate. But it also climbs worse than twins. Therefore I cite your beautiful Aussie leaflet:

The above graph does not provide information about the absolute noise levels that people hear
But I didn't want to get into a slagging match with the 'nervous' fans.

Keep loving it, I don't blame you! Most other airspace users and controllers are a little more realistic though and can see the problems that arise. Some expose the rather silly solutions to minimize the impact, instead of joining the chorus-jubilation.
glofish is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 16:16
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
never understood why people live in houses near airports like LHR if they do not like the noise.....
Paolo is online now  
Old 16th Apr 2012, 16:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East Anglia
Age: 83
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not understand why airline managers do not live on board the 380 full time either...seems the safest place to put them to cause least damage.
40&80 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2012, 00:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Age: 68
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Management pilot at EK likes to bow forward and open up their a**ses for shafting. If any moppet brings up this idea on account of the local residents' complaint of noise, have the guts to tell that guy to stuff it. They already had free double glazing and the dugong is an ICAO annex 16 stage IV compliant aircraft. What do they want next, the moon?

It's time management pilots stop pandering to the gallery, making the aviators' lot more stressful and unrewarding.
Langkasuka is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2012, 12:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Analysis of the dugong noise over 3 years operation at Heathrow at

http://www.heathrowairport.com/stati...ort_1106_2.pdf

Are landing dugongs any better than landing 747's ?
118.70 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2012, 17:08
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seen a noise certificate in a GE 777 lately? It's stage IV too. This isn't about the airplane. It's about getting more slots into LHR. If commercial bookings say a 777 makes more sense than a 380 for a 3am arrival into LHR, than a 777 it shall be. It's just more convenient and provides better press coverage for TC to trumpet the 380.
kneebrace is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2012, 18:38
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: FL400
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't MLS get installed at LHR? Theoretically this could facilitate steeper approaches right?
I don't know if it's still the case but I was under the impression that BA have MLS fitted to their 320 fleet, so I imagine the whole idea is not beyond the realms of possibility.
Al Murdoch is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.