Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Arrival Procedures for Kabul (OAKB)

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Arrival Procedures for Kabul (OAKB)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Mar 2012, 17:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In my house
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrival Procedures for Kabul (OAKB)

This is directed at anybody with experience with Afghan procedures, especially Kabul.

All of the airways in Afghanistan are RNAV (as far as I can tell). The IAPs state that Radar or DME Required. It doesn't seem like there are any feeder routes from the airways to the IAFs so I was wondering how you get onto an approach without being vectored?

As an example, if you are on A453 from MIXEL to MURAD (MSA 16,500), how do you get to the IAFs of WEBRO (ILS 29) or LANNI (VOR/DME)?

Any help appreciated.

Cheers.
davys747 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2012, 03:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kabul approach will vector you on to final for the appropriate procedure (ILS, VOR, or RNAV)...they probably put you above the published profile, so be ready for a bit of a steep descent to regain said profile....
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2012, 19:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: near the beach
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also - radio / ATC is rather poor until in vicinity KBL - also expect tight vectors. Lost G/S several times - have fun. As Ironbutt57 says - early config saves it ....
Twin2040 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 12:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, its painfully obvious their VHF equipment went to the lowest bidder, always a lot of frequency noise...
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 13:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Big Blue House
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You'll get vectored from MURAD or TAPDO. On the way out you'll need to be at your height by your joining point, obviously.
thebarrel is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 15:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SA
Age: 40
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The approach controllers at Kabul are all pretty sharp. They are all ex-pats, and do an incredible job providing vectors away from both terrain and other traffic. If you are a little worried about being vectored in above the glideslope, just request to descend in the hold at WEBRO, down to 13600ft (I think it is off the top of my head), and that will avoid having to make any dramatic rates of decent to get onto the vertical profile.

As the guys have said, be prepared for very bad jamming on VHF, and also watch out for the choppers that will do parallel approaches onto the taxiways on either side of you, sometimes in bad vis. I've had plenty RA's on the ILS just before the TCAS goes to TA only mode, and it can be very unnerving in bad weather.

The other thing to factor in. DELAYS... both for arrivals and departures. When Karzai or one of his Cronies decide to go flying, the airport comes to a complete standstill, with little or no warning. You can expect departure delays when the VIZ drops below 5000m, up to an hour at the holding point (regardless of if you are an Airliner, or King Air). So if you have the luxury of extra fuel, and your company won't string you up by the nuts for taking extra fuel, then take the extra fuel.

I have been flying a medium cat turbo prop in and out of there for almost 2 years, so much of what I've said may have no relevance to your operation into Kabul, but I thought I'd share it nonetheless. Safe flying!
EladElap is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 16:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SA
Age: 40
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One more thing. There is a lot of interference on the glideslope from arcraft holding at the holding point of RW29, they can cause a temporary loss of glide slope that can last upwards of 15-20 secs.

Also, at the last ISAF safety meeting, it was mentioned that the generators providing back up power for the LLZ and Glideslope are either without fuel or totally stuffed, and that as such there is no reliable source of back up power for the ILS. Just one more thing to factor in I guess. The VOR is generally reliable (4nm on the extended centreline), however the DME has been on/off most of the second hal of last year). I'm not too sure if it has been sorted out now.

Cheers
EladElap is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.