EK EY QR automation policy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EK EY QR automation policy
Question for pilots operating in the Middle East.
What is your company policy on use of AP / FD / AT?
Any restrictions on manual flying?
If you fly for a restrictive company, how do pilots view the policy, and how do you maintain proficiency?
What is your company policy on use of AP / FD / AT?
Any restrictions on manual flying?
If you fly for a restrictive company, how do pilots view the policy, and how do you maintain proficiency?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you'll find proficiency in modern jet aircraft has change and is not a measure of manual handling skills but rather your management of the automation. At EK we are supposed to have a manual handling simulator twice a year but I for one haven't done one in the entire time I've been here. Autopilot on at 200' and disconnect around 500AGL on approach. You can manually fly it on departure to 10000' but what's the point? AT & FD are always on.
Last edited by Bypass ratio; 18th Feb 2012 at 03:54.
BR and SS,
The current OM-A automation policy was a change from the previous "Max appropriate use" policy, specifically to allow manual flight where workload makes it appropriate.
There is still a strong "hangover' culture that the company "Wants" max use of Automation- but if that was the case, they wouldn't have made the change.
Low traffic and reasonable weather (another common hangover seems to be "Use the AP till you can see the runway"- for chrisake, we HAVE Intrument ratings, there is NO problem hand flying in IMC, and indeed it is reccomended to fly at least the last 800' if you are doing a manual landing- even if the weather is at CatI minima), there is nothing to stop you having a pole.
I always do, encourage others to do likewise, and am reflecting the view of the Training Department that we should be hand-flying more.
The current OM-A automation policy was a change from the previous "Max appropriate use" policy, specifically to allow manual flight where workload makes it appropriate.
There is still a strong "hangover' culture that the company "Wants" max use of Automation- but if that was the case, they wouldn't have made the change.
Low traffic and reasonable weather (another common hangover seems to be "Use the AP till you can see the runway"- for chrisake, we HAVE Intrument ratings, there is NO problem hand flying in IMC, and indeed it is reccomended to fly at least the last 800' if you are doing a manual landing- even if the weather is at CatI minima), there is nothing to stop you having a pole.
I always do, encourage others to do likewise, and am reflecting the view of the Training Department that we should be hand-flying more.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Among camels and dunes
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SS
Autopilot can be taken out below 10000ft on departure and on approach
I wouldn't think that would be ideal and if there is a track bust, or level bust....
Do you guys all fly your RNAV 1 GNSS approaches/SIDS/STARS by hand????
I wouldn't think that would be ideal and if there is a track bust, or level bust....
I wouldn't think that would be ideal and if there is a track bust, or level bust....
But getting vectored or following a normal STAR with RNP 5, why not? If you can't follow a flight director, you probably shouldn't be here!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: dxb
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always do, encourage others to do likewise, and am reflecting the view of the Training Department that we should be hand-flying more.
Would you be able to share what the specific policy is?
And by 'hand-flying' what's left on, turned off? AT/FD/both?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dubai
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can manually fly it on departure to 10000' but what's the point? AT & FD are always on.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In the State of Perpetual Confusion
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can manually fly it on departure to 10000' but what's the point? AT & FD are always on.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jetjok,
We fly manual RNAV1 procedures all the time. I did one last night as a matter of fact. Granted, most people will leave the FD on, but I've seen some folks go raw data in IMC. Not a big deal really, as long as the PNF doesn't become task saturated.
So it seems to be that EK only allows hand flying below 10,000, and only with the AT/FD on. Anybody else care to add their own airline's policy?
We fly manual RNAV1 procedures all the time. I did one last night as a matter of fact. Granted, most people will leave the FD on, but I've seen some folks go raw data in IMC. Not a big deal really, as long as the PNF doesn't become task saturated.
So it seems to be that EK only allows hand flying below 10,000, and only with the AT/FD on. Anybody else care to add their own airline's policy?
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Task saturated" or "higher workload" is the belly aching I hear from the guy in the other seat who thinks he is too underpaid/overworked to deal with the pressure of simultaneously talking on the radio and turning a heading/altitude knob for me.
Recently I was flying with a guy who when the auto thrust kicked off and would not reengage in cruise, wanted to hold and start a dialogue with maintenance about a fix. We were only a few miles from top of descent at our own hub, and he didn't feel comfortable taking it down by hand. We did some resets to no avail and he looked at me and asked what I thought we should do. I guess the years in an RJ paid off because at least one of us has flown a jet from cruise by magically moving those two sticks in the middle to keep the fans blowing.
Automation is great, especially on the far back side of the clock with two tired brains.. but we are in a time when, outside of the hundred or so hours in a single engine trainer, captains have spent a career flying with so much automation they are afraid to fly a plane. We also have airlines that challenge a pilot's decision to do exactly what it is we are paid to do..... fly a plane.
Recently I was flying with a guy who when the auto thrust kicked off and would not reengage in cruise, wanted to hold and start a dialogue with maintenance about a fix. We were only a few miles from top of descent at our own hub, and he didn't feel comfortable taking it down by hand. We did some resets to no avail and he looked at me and asked what I thought we should do. I guess the years in an RJ paid off because at least one of us has flown a jet from cruise by magically moving those two sticks in the middle to keep the fans blowing.
Automation is great, especially on the far back side of the clock with two tired brains.. but we are in a time when, outside of the hundred or so hours in a single engine trainer, captains have spent a career flying with so much automation they are afraid to fly a plane. We also have airlines that challenge a pilot's decision to do exactly what it is we are paid to do..... fly a plane.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Recently I was flying with a guy who when the auto thrust kicked off and would not reengage in cruise, wanted to hold and start a dialogue with maintenance about a fix. We were only a few miles from top of descent at our own hub, and he didn't feel comfortable taking it down by hand. We did some resets to no avail and he looked at me and asked what I thought we should do. I guess the years in an RJ paid off because at least one of us has flown a jet from cruise by magically moving those two sticks in the middle to keep the fans blowing.
Just to be clear, I don't use the term "task saturated" as an excuse for lazy, but on the last flight of a long duty day, I'm more likely to use the AP to the fullest extent.
