Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Emirates Recruitment target

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Emirates Recruitment target

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2010, 10:40
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello all, I'm wondering if there some of you that may be able to offer some advice re EK or indeed if anyone could point me in the right direction. I'm presently out of work (18mths!) and was a low PIC houred captain in his thirties on an old 130 seat non efis jet. I have 4500 hrs total, of which 4300 are on commercial jet types >45000 tonnes MTOW. I havent flown since my employer became insolvent despite my best efforts. I refuse to do the P2F line training scheme route as I still have some morals (amazing after being in this game for a while!)

EK appeared to be interested but said as I haven't flown within the last 12mths they can't proceed with my application. I can't tell you how frustrating this is, and their solution was effectively to get some commercial time then I'd be set. Ok so to get a job I have to get a job, seems tough but I will do it.... hopefully sooner rather than later the bills don't get any cheaper!

EK said the recency requirement was a DCAA thing which I can believe, but I sent an email to the UAE DCAA asking for clarification and they referred me back to EK?? It seems entirely bizarre to me when I would have to do a B777 (presumably) type rating training course with the sponsoring airline. Whats the real deal here?

I don't want to come across as bitter, this msg isn't written in that tone or context. I would fly virtually anywhere given the chance, but the industry seems a little on its head right now. Experienced non rated guys are being passed over for P2Fs or 250hr guys, someone with 150hrs Efis gets more recognition than someone with a few thousand hrs on a mid-sized analogue jet where you can argue the workload is perceivably higher.

I know my time will come and I look forward to the day when I can get back to my career.
JimbosJet is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 11:04
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jimbo, I feel for you!

I think if you were being honest with yourself though, you may well find the selection (interview) simulator very tough being so un-current, and having only recently flown analogue aircraft (B737-2?).

Being thrown into an all glass B777 sim, you may well struggle to pass (less than 50% of candidates make it through the simulator part of selection) as the odds are stacked against you??

I'm not questioning your ability or experience, just pointing out that the selection process isn't a given ie you'd have to pass that before you got anywhere near the B777/A330 type rating.

If you are serious about joining EK, give yourself the best possible chance of passing....... All you need is SOME commercial Airline flying within 12 months of joining. Offer to fly the line free of charge for a month for an airline which has your type, then come to EK??

In any case, good luck
Oblaaspop is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 11:27
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats my trouble, my type is no longer flying in Europe due to its age.

Looks like i'm off to the desert in that case, anyone have a spare pair of kevlar pants?

Thanks for your kind words Oblaaspop.
JimbosJet is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 17:41
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seat 8F
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Jimbo

Jimbo Just a little message to let you know that there is no more worries for you, as you will quickly have an opportunity with Ryanair...They might have quickly a need of experienced pilots. During the last 2 weeks every single first officer above 2500hrs who came my way told me they have applied to Ek...I think that soon Fr management will bite their fingers to have slash the senior FO salary. And to be honest for a FR Fo(who has to bring his water to the cockpit and fly more than 95 hrs a month) Emirates is still a paradise...

Good luck Jimbo
flycheaper is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 21:48
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: KGRB, but on the road about 1/2 the time.
Age: 61
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi!

A couple of points:

Jimbo: U need to be (jet) current within 12 months before the interview, and before you start class. Some guys were in the pool for a while, went over 12 mos current and were dropped from the pool (of course, EK could change this policy...). There ARE jobs in Africa, too.

Jet Time Only???
Read of a guy will all turboprop/no jet time recently hired at EK....that is NOT what the website says, but there seems to be a lot of that going around.

DEC: DECs actually cost the company MORE MONEY in the long run. It may save them the training cost of the FO to Capt and his replacement, and they may be all that EK cares about at that point. BUT, in the long run, it will cost them more money than it saves. Can they see long-term cost/benefits? I don't know. A LOT of US airline mgmt only looks short-term.

cliff
LFW
atpcliff is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 21:54
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Over the Pacific mostly
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DECs actually cost the company MORE MONEY in the long run.
And this is because???
The Dominican is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 22:47
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: KGRB, but on the road about 1/2 the time.
Age: 61
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi!

When you hire one DEC, you only have one training event, so you save the money from that one event.

When you hire DECS, for each DEC hired, how many FOs quit? For each that quits, you need recruiting, hiring, and training costs. How many Capts will leave early, because they see that if they company will not treat the FOs well, they know THEY may not be treated well? For each one that leaves, that is two training events, plus the recruiting cost for a new FO (or a new DEC, if they replace them with a DEC).

Then, this information is conveyed to all of us, here on the web. How many "good" candidates don't apply, or don't complete the hiring process, because of the DEC situation? This causes the recruiting and training costs to go up.

How many current pilots get upset when they here about the DECS? IF they have roster time available in the future, how many will NOT volunteer to do overtime when they could, because of negative feelings with the company.

Etc., etc. There are a LOT of hidden costs, when you start messing with your employees.

cliff
LFW
atpcliff is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 23:13
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Over the Pacific mostly
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for each DEC hired, how many FOs quit?
You are talking about costs associated with an unhappy pilot group, not necessarily due to DEC's because there are many companies that hire DEC's and these things you talk about don't always happen. It is true that attrition (for any number of reasons) cost the company more money in the long run but management seems to believe it is just the price of doing business, good luck trying to make them see it otherwise

Nice to hear from ya Cliff
The Dominican is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2010, 05:28
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
I'm afraid that's wishful thinking, atpcliff. Was there any great exodus when EK was taking DECS, even when there were FOs qualified for upgrade?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2010, 06:12
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tundra
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DECs or not is decided based on cost, not happy/unhappy pilots.

My understanding is the failure rate for DECs in the past has been higher than new F/Os and upgrades. The additional expenses incurred because of this makes DECs not as cost effective as they would appear on the surface.

Whether the curent policy changes will be dictated by the latest cost/benefit anaysis by the company. With the company's best financial interests as the overriding factor, of course.
Rather Be Skiing is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2010, 13:31
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that successful integration of any DEC, and pass/failure of training is more a function of the individual and what level of relative experience they posses.

Any DEC with say 3000hrs CMD on B777 or A330/340 flying internationally should have no problem.

Cav.
CAVnotOK is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 01:06
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Here There Yonder
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JimbosJet,

Many licencing authorities require an ATPL holder to have flown ( 20+ hours ) during the last six months prior to application and usually on an aircraft of 20Tonnes+ to recognise an ATPL/ATR to be valid.

I know nothing about the aviation authorities in the Middle East but it has come up more than once with the S.E. Asia/ Far East authorities.

Good luck.
Ndicho Moja is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 04:42
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: EQUATOR
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Oman Air

after reading this thread, recruiting procedure, roster system and training at EK, I think WY have better recruiting system lead by a very experience local TRE ex F/O from GF and world wide experience been upgrade as Capt at WY (only).

the only airline (if is WY airline..?) that can/approve to roster pilot for 3 consecutive or more night flying with turn around, due to safety reason.

training departement, create a simulator training for Kathmandu flight by 4 leading TRI of company experience world wide, but they never been in Kathmandu before not even as tourist, result is the simulator training is not approved by their own authorities

but Oman Air will continue be a leading safe airlines in the region, one day we will beat Emirates....no worries....one day...???
in FACT is is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 19:58
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MIDDLE EAST
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, three times I've read that and still it makes no sense whatsoever!

Anyone care to translate into plain English please?

Harry
harry the cod is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 03:54
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with you Harry, WTF???

Cav.
CAVnotOK is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 03:48
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: EQUATOR
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
english not your mother language...???read 200x then you will understand like memory items

very simple that Oman Air are very low in all standard, just like circus company, and they call them self an airline, but if you are desparate pilot's just joint them
in FACT is is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 04:40
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you for the English lesson. Things have really changed since I was in High School.

Cav.
CAVnotOK is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 05:05
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: On the road
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With Vaustralia slowly being merged into Virgin Blue and then gradually being phased out EK may get at least 50 pilot applications. Apparently some were previously from Emirates as well.
Grey Nomad is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 09:31
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the number is probably closer to 5. Those who left the desert are in no hurry to go back. I think most would prefer to be an F/O on a 737.
6100 is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 09:37
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: You Name It.
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think most would prefer to be an F/O on a 737
At least you know your limitations 6100. A rare trait these days!!
jackbauer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.