8 DEC's interviewed at EK last week
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The main difference
The main difference between long haul and short haul is that you have to perform when your body does not want to. In others words if you need to be 100 % on the short haul you will suffer badly on the long haul.
DEC or not.
DEC or not.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UAE
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, that would be one of the differences but I would suggest that there are more challenges than that. It really is impossible to compare the radar enviroment in Europe, whith VHF comms everywhere, to a (say) procedural RNAV approach into Addis. To say nothing of the fun on the ground once you get there.
Europe has its own challenges but they are completely different to the ones we face on a day to day basis on the EK network. You don't need to be God's gift to aviation but it does take time to adapt.
Europe has its own challenges but they are completely different to the ones we face on a day to day basis on the EK network. You don't need to be God's gift to aviation but it does take time to adapt.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Asia
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a few comments on the "baby-sitting" issue.
A DEC with 20 years airline experience and 10 years as captain will (almost) always be a better overall commander than an F/O with 10 years total airline experience.
Granted, the cosmetics of company SOP's and certain local knowledge will be to the F/O's advantage in comparison with the new DEC, but overall, the old guy will be the more suitable Commander, simply because he's more experienced.
DECs are the future, accept it. For financial reasons as someone rightly illustrated, but also because it makes sense to recruit the necessary overall experience to a growing company. You don't see doctors applying for nurses jobs.
Those that see themselves as "baby-sitters", I think your comments reflect on your lack of suitability as future Commanders. Sadly.
A DEC with 20 years airline experience and 10 years as captain will (almost) always be a better overall commander than an F/O with 10 years total airline experience.
Granted, the cosmetics of company SOP's and certain local knowledge will be to the F/O's advantage in comparison with the new DEC, but overall, the old guy will be the more suitable Commander, simply because he's more experienced.
DECs are the future, accept it. For financial reasons as someone rightly illustrated, but also because it makes sense to recruit the necessary overall experience to a growing company. You don't see doctors applying for nurses jobs.
Those that see themselves as "baby-sitters", I think your comments reflect on your lack of suitability as future Commanders. Sadly.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Airplane
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gents, when was the last time you were concerned or even aware of the seniority and grade of the flight attendants. If one of the flight attendants was junior but held a higher position than one of their co-workers it is unlikely that I would even notice. On the occasions where I did notice I certainly would not give it much thought. All I am concerned with is do I have the required crew to do the job. That is exactly how our managers look at us. As long as the job is getting done as cheaply as possible they will be happy. Individual issues do not matter.
7
7
Join Date: May 2008
Location: pit
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's the difference between information from pprune and information from any EK body?
The one is a rumor, the other a blatant lie.
I actually don't know anything about the DEC stuff, but please, information out of a GS?????
To cite a fellow poster on another thread: I have not been lied to as many times in my previous life as in the very few years at EK. They pretend it's cultural, but extremely well duplicated by "western" spit-bowl-holders.
The one is a rumor, the other a blatant lie.
I actually don't know anything about the DEC stuff, but please, information out of a GS?????
To cite a fellow poster on another thread: I have not been lied to as many times in my previous life as in the very few years at EK. They pretend it's cultural, but extremely well duplicated by "western" spit-bowl-holders.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Asia
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regarding DECs suitability.
Just to clarify, my generalization refers to captains that have been trained in normal, well-renowned flying organizations and as such have had their command aptitude put to the test.
Naturally guys from less than desirable backgrounds should not make the cut, and maybe that's where airlines fail in the selection procedures. I maintain the notion that experience in normal airline operations counts in the left seat, and that's why DECs are here to stay.
Just to clarify, my generalization refers to captains that have been trained in normal, well-renowned flying organizations and as such have had their command aptitude put to the test.
Naturally guys from less than desirable backgrounds should not make the cut, and maybe that's where airlines fail in the selection procedures. I maintain the notion that experience in normal airline operations counts in the left seat, and that's why DECs are here to stay.
The DEC thing is no longer an issue. The fellas that joined post 2003 knew all about them before joining. In fact they had to scroll down below the DEC info to find the FO info on the emirates careers website. So knowing that EK hired DECs and what this would mean they still decided EK was the right place for them.
The Fos that joined prior to 2003 were shafted and lied to by the company, and really are the only people that have a real gripe with the DEC issue.
the Don
The Fos that joined prior to 2003 were shafted and lied to by the company, and really are the only people that have a real gripe with the DEC issue.
the Don
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UAE
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Everybody that joined prior to the announcement of DECs in 2003 had now had a chance of a command course. As Don says, the situation is not good, and not right, but it is not a secret either. The company has hired and will continue to hire DECs to meet their needs. It isn't going to change.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pub
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed that those who joined post '03 have always known about the DEC program, but as with everything at Ek the goalposts were continually shifted. Initially it was only for those with substantial wide body command time on an Ek type aircraft. Then when the applicants that were eligible dried up the requirements were reduced until (as mentioned by one previous poster), there were candidates accepted from the left seat of narrow body aircraft who had never ventured outside Europe.
Those from my previous employer who joined Ek up to 18 months after I did came in as DEC's where as that opportunity was denied to me as the criteria were higher when I applied. Fortuitous, yes, but fair?
Those from my previous employer who joined Ek up to 18 months after I did came in as DEC's where as that opportunity was denied to me as the criteria were higher when I applied. Fortuitous, yes, but fair?
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A DEC with 20 years airline experience and 10 years as captain will (almost) always be a better overall commander than an F/O with 10 years total airline experience.
I maintain the notion that experience in normal airline operations counts in the left seat, and that's why DECs are here to stay.
Those that see themselves as "baby-sitters", I think your comments reflect on your lack of suitability as future Commanders.
IF I was running EK, I would hire Captains to be Captains, and First Officers to be First Officers...with the proviso that the latter category might be upgraded, if I felt like it.
SQ had the right idea, many years ago.
At SQ years ago, locals had a well defined career path.
Expats?
You were hired for a specific FD position, period...with a very few exceptions.
When locals were due for Command training, their complete files were checked, especially the monthly fitness report filed by each line Captain they had flown with, that past month.
Too many black marks?
Rejected for either upgrade to larger equipment, or upgrade to command.
SK (Charlie) Chan, the DFO at the time, ran a tight ship, and his policies kept First Officers on a short tether.
A wise precaution, in my view.
Last edited by 411A; 17th Apr 2010 at 18:01. Reason: Additional thoughts
Guess a few guys here (maybe) new to the PP forum, or otherwise unfamiliar with 411A's role as "Winder-Up-in-Chief", in which case serves you right for taking the bait.
However, for the more observant, it must be said that there is often a germ of truth in a lot of his (obviously) more unpopular observations
.
What I say is-"To thine own self be true"-if you are going to be fit for the left seat, (ability, attitude, preparation, etc, etc.), nothing will stop you. Fairly simple, isn't it?
p.s F/O once said to me, "never trust a Captain!". (in jest, of course). Replied back -"Agree absolutely; Never trust anyone!"
However, for the more observant, it must be said that there is often a germ of truth in a lot of his (obviously) more unpopular observations
.What I say is-"To thine own self be true"-if you are going to be fit for the left seat, (ability, attitude, preparation, etc, etc.), nothing will stop you. Fairly simple, isn't it?
p.s F/O once said to me, "never trust a Captain!". (in jest, of course). Replied back -"Agree absolutely; Never trust anyone!"
