Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK Toronto

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Aug 2005, 16:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UAE
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK Toronto

I recently heard that EK were offered four slots a week into Toronto, insisted they wanted seven or nothing at all and now have had all slots revoked!
jdoe is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 18:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Global Nomad
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably because they wanted seven or nothing at all.
Global Nomad is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2005, 18:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Landan!
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry but I think the slots were taken by EY
gccpro is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2005, 05:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly the same scenario as happened with Capetown, I think.

Will EK never learn?

CTOAN
Can't think of a name is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2005, 17:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Will EK never learn?"

You say this like they don't know how to run a business.
Dude they made billions last year.

Crazy
Crazycanuk is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2005, 18:40
  #6 (permalink)  
flynbyu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Emirates may have made millions last year, but how much of that actually comes strictly from the airline and not the million other "emirates" side businesses?

EY has announced service to Toronto beginning end of october 3 x's a week
 
Old 3rd Aug 2005, 06:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In the State of Perpetual Confusion
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Will EK never learn?"

I don't usually get involved in these discussions but I think the main factors driving Emirates from taking up these "limited slots" are:
-Increased unit costs for less than daily service. When you open a station, there are certain costs associated that you have to pay regardless of whether you operate once a week or 7 times a week. Those costs are certainly higher on a unit basis when they are spread out over fewer flights.

-Either don't have the crews to layover there for up to 4 days or are unwilling to "lose" them for that amount of time. Again a cost vs. revenue thing.

While I think that in some areas, EK has sacrificed good judgement for lower costs, it's attention to details like this one that helps them run a profitable business. One thing that EK does very well is run the numbers commercially and it's my guess that they looked at Toronto/Cape Town with 4 flights weekly, the costs associated and potential revenue and decided they could make more money somewhere else.
Gillegan is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2005, 06:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bolivia
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since I have been here, the vast majority of new destinations have been commenced with less than daily services, many have been 4 times a week, so that argument just doesn't hold water. I would definitely lean toward the lack of crew theory as being more believable.
Vorsicht is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2005, 06:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In the State of Perpetual Confusion
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The point I was trying to make is that for less than daily service, unit and startup costs are usually higher. To make an informed decision, you would then have to look at what your projected revenue would be including revenue growth and compare it with other opportunities. You then decide which one makes you more money. While EK has started a lot of services with less than daily service, I also observe that trend reducing over the years. In most of those cases, daily service was not far behind. Perhaps they felt less confidence in the potential for daily service than at other places - I don't know, I'm just speculating.

As I said, I do think there is a lot to be critical of regarding EK's management of the flight operation, but there aren't too many airlines out there that rival their commercial planning. I don't know why specifically Cape Town or Toronto weren't justified by less than daily service, I was just stating that Emirates runs the numbers and in this type of decision, that's probably the best way to do it.

Certainly as tightly as Emirates is running the crewing numbers right now would also factor into it. If that is the reason, then it is an example of possibly saving a penny, losing a pound if it restricts their coveted "commercial flexibility".
Gillegan is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2005, 10:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheraton, Hilton....
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seaman Staynes.
where did you get this numbers from???
800/400 it's total bull, don't believe everything you hear.
Zomp is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2005, 10:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Global Nomad
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a rumour network after all.....

... and believe me, there is a lot of half truths, total truths and untruths written here. Just got to work out who and what to believe.

One exception though, everything I say is true.
Global Nomad is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.