Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Medical & Health
Reload this Page >

Is there such a thing as a "restriction" on a Class 1 medical?

Wikiposts
Search
Medical & Health News and debate about medical and health issues as they relate to aircrews and aviation. Any information gleaned from this forum MUST be backed up by consulting your state-registered health professional or AME. Due to advertising legislation in various jurisdictions, endorsements of individual practitioners is not permitted.

Is there such a thing as a "restriction" on a Class 1 medical?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Feb 2017, 09:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there such a thing as a "restriction" on a Class 1 medical?

Have seen a number of job ads which specify "Class 1 medical with no restrictions".

Is there such a thing as a "restriction" on a Class 1?

Mine has a couple of "limitations" (such as VDL, and the far more limiting OML). I appreciate that in common parlance "limitation" and "restriction" might be considered to be synonymous, but this is aviation where words have a specific meaning (ever tried asking for a revalidation when what you need is a renewal?).

The only "restriction" listed on the CAA website is "RAI" ("Restricted to operations for Airbus Industries only")!

Yes, I know the answer is to contact the recruiter but unfortunately most of them won't respond to queries. I think I know what the answer is (which is that OML would be considered a "restriction" whereas a "VDL" wouldn't), but I doubt if I will ever find out as my applications will just disappear down a black hole and I won't hear back ........
shy ted is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2017, 19:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'As or with a co-pilot' was applied to my Class One when I was experiencing some cardiac problems some years ago. I continued to fly with this restriction for a number of weeks whilst awaiting the results of a 24 hour ECG to be reviewed by the CAA's consultant cardiologist.
olympus is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 09:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Or-E-Gun, USA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Multiple types

The most common is probably eye glasses!
No Fly Zone is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 15:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: A place in the sun
Age: 82
Posts: 1,269
Received 48 Likes on 19 Posts
I seem to remember many years ago a captain who had impaired vision in his right eye. He was allowed to continue flying with his medical endorsed 'As or with a co-pilot' so long as he occupied only the left seat.
Bergerie1 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 23:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recently did a aviation pilot medical out of curiosity (I am a LAME) because I have an issue with my right eye where I have peripheral vision but looking straight ahead it has some issues and was told by the examiner that I could get a restricted class 1 medical which they said I could only become an FO and not a captain. Still wouldn't mind but I'm sure airlines these days wouldn't be to keen.
sconnors2114 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2017, 14:04
  #6 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,270
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
I expect you've had good advice, but I've recently had a vitrectomy and peel and some of the scar tissue was peeled from over the fovea. One never knows just what's possible these days.

but I doubt if I will ever find out as my applications will just disappear down a black hole and I won't hear back ........

Mmm, reminds me of the Chief Pilot who glared at the huge pile of applications on his desk. He put half of them in the bin and said, "The last thing I need is unlucky pilots".
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 12:08
  #7 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the initial Class One must be issued without OML endorsement.

Perhaps an AME could confirm this......
parkfell is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 12:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Below transition level
Posts: 364
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking about UK CAA land here. That was the case in the past, however it changed briefly under EASA briefly to allow an initial to be issued with an OML. Now it has now changed back so an OML can only be added to an existing Class 1, not on initial issue.
Fostex is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.