Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Medical & Health
Reload this Page >

Are there any likely negative implications of using an ANR headset?

Wikiposts
Search
Medical & Health News and debate about medical and health issues as they relate to aircrews and aviation. Any information gleaned from this forum MUST be backed up by consulting your state-registered health professional or AME. Due to advertising legislation in various jurisdictions, endorsements of individual practitioners is not permitted.

Are there any likely negative implications of using an ANR headset?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Feb 2012, 10:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: U.K.
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are there any likely negative implications of using an ANR headset?

Could the system in an ANR headset (the electrics in the ear piece) cause any health issues long term for an airline pilot? It can't be good to have coils and magnets pushed against the head!

Thanks in advance for any inputs.
BlackandBrown is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2012, 17:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would imagine that they're far worse than passive headsets that just push coils and magnets up against your head.
Air Soul is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 07:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Below transition level
Posts: 364
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A modern ANR headset is a signal processing solution and requires no change to the transducers in your headset except perhaps for an additional microphone. I very much doubt there is any danger from the E and B fields from the small low power moving coils in a modern headset.

Few if any crew use ANR any way as all modern aircraft have both passive and active acoustic cancellation and damping in the cockpit. Having said that they may be useful if you spend your days flying SEP/MEP or rotary wing.

Last edited by Fostex; 14th Feb 2012 at 11:02.
Fostex is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 19:06
  #4 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,672
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
All of us at NetJets Europe have been issued Telex 850 ANR or Bose A20 headsets.
I had been using the Sennheiser HMEC 25s but now use a Bose A20 ANR. Pricey but well worth it.
redsnail is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 19:19
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
Most test pilots elect not to use ANR, because whilst they need a quiet operating environment to maintain concentration (and protect their hearing) they value being able to hear all the funny noises that reach the cockpit. DCs seem the usual preference.

I can't think of any other reason not to wear a good ANR if it's available to you however - what's on your ear is at the end of the day just a speaker, a bit of soundproofing, and some electronics. (Just!, yes there's a hell of a lot of R&D went into getting those right.)

I must admit to mostly using a passive in my vintage aeroplane, and when test flying - because I want to be sensitive to the funny noises. For long trips, or on board our research aircraft, I really like the Bose-X option, because it's not really required that I'm all that sensitive to stuff! In microlights I use a high attenuation passive, because that's all that's available - but also the Lynx and Communica passives I own are much better than most GA or airline systems at dealing with high ambient noise.

I look forward to trying an A20 sometime soon!

Why do I own seven headsets, and have an eighth issued at work? Goodness knows - basically there isn't a universally right answer I suppose.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 13:10
  #6 (permalink)  
BBK
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 469
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Genghis

I knew of at least one TP who always used ANR, 'GT' at Dunsfold. His comments on its effectiveness were always appreciated as we sought to get it into operational service.

B and B

I would strongly recommend using ANR as the benefits in, hopefully, preserving your hearing are enormous. The point about not being able to hear when something technical is malfunctioning is IMHO likely incorrect. ANR, by reducing overall noise levels, will probably allow you to hear something that would otherwise be masked especially by prop/blade noise. An American Army helo pilot experienced exactly that. He was flying with ANR on and said he heard a problem with the gearbox that he felt he would have missed without it.
BBK is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 13:45
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
I knew of at least one TP who always used ANR, 'GT' at Dunsfold. His comments on its effectiveness were always appreciated as we sought to get it into operational service.
Interesting, GT is one of the best regarded of the VTOL TP community - so an opinion I'd take as pretty weighty.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2012, 14:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,251
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Few if any crew use ANR any way as all modern aircraft have both passive and active acoustic cancellation and damping in the cockpit
Exactly the opposite, in my experience. Of circa 850 pilots in our company I'd say we have 800 using ANR. Not sure what the other 50 use but there have been some compatibility issues. Our spare flightdeck headsets are about 50/50 split but going towards ANR as the old ones die out.
Couldn't live without mine. 2 x 6hr sectors per day will rapidly wear you out without good ANR. Maybe 757/767/321/738 are not 'modern'?

Bose-X leaves my ears quite sore, though.
blue up is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 07:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was kinda surprised about that comment as well. I don't know of any aircraft that uses active noise dampening inside the flightdeck, as far as i know that is a task that has to be done by a headset. But then i do fly a jurassic area aircraft, the 737 series (classic and NG). Sadly boeing is pretty good at designing aircraft, but absolutely awful at designing a quiet aircon and equipment cooling solution.
Denti is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.