Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Medical & Health
Reload this Page >

completely stupid question...

Wikiposts
Search
Medical & Health News and debate about medical and health issues as they relate to aircrews and aviation. Any information gleaned from this forum MUST be backed up by consulting your state-registered health professional or AME. Due to advertising legislation in various jurisdictions, endorsements of individual practitioners is not permitted.

completely stupid question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Aug 2007, 18:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
completely stupid question...

not really medical related, but is there a cumulative buildup of radiation from the x ray machines that screen our bags? Do the machines still emit radiation ? Am i carrying around a flight bag that will be glowing in the dark after a few years? Will I still need to carry a flashlight then, or does the bag cover it? cheers B
Dehavillandman is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 18:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: gone surfin'
Age: 59
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is no such thing as a stupid questionapart from the ones my wife asks.

Try running a search, I believe this was covered about a year ago, and the consensus was no, your bag won't "hold" the irradiation it was exposed to.

I'm not sure about the dosage of radiation used in airport x-ray machines, I guess it is miniscule compared to our everyday "background" exposure.
gingernut is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 20:04
  #3 (permalink)  
Spoon PPRuNerist & Mad Inistrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Twickenham, home of rugby
Posts: 7,407
Received 276 Likes on 176 Posts
Might make you think twice about carrying it on your lap, though!

SD
Saab Dastard is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2007, 23:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Age: 34
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well as far as I know the radiation emitted from x ray machines have a reletivley short half life so even if a bag did manage to hold the radiation, it would be back to normal in days, even less than that.
JusAWeeDram is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 08:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
x ray machines have a reletivley short half life
It doesn't have a half life at all.

Half life is the property of a radionucleide, i.e. an atom that is unstable, and going (at some point) to emit some radiation in the form of a particle or electromagnetic gamma wave with very high energy / short wavelength).

The radiation itself keeps on travelling until it gets absorbed by something.

If there are particles involved, they can knock into and then break up or stick to an atom they hit, resulting in the atom changing into a different element. This new atom may in itself be unstable and hence radioactive.

If there are gamma waves involved, they also can affect a nucleus because of their small wavelength (comparable to a necleus) and high energy.

Whereas, although an X-Ray is an electromagnetic wave, it is not produced by a nuclear process but rather by an electronic one. It has relatively low energy compared to a gamma and relatively large wavelength compared to a nucleus, so does not cause nuclear changes in things that are hit.

Their wavelength is more comparable to the size of an atom as a whole, and they do have enough energy to ionise an atom, (as in knock out an electron from it) thereby disrupting the chemistry. So they are harmful, which is why only the minimum possible exposure consistent with the required task is used. However they do not make things radioactive.

pb
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 13:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: gone surfin'
Age: 59
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd be a bit reluctant to put me testicles where the security men sit though
gingernut is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 22:59
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Posts: 272
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gingernut, a bit reluctant? I'd be totally reluctant! Why would you want to put your testicles somewhere where someone is about to sit down. They would get squashed and it would hurt a great deal. Are you a gay sado-masochist?
outofwhack is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 08:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: gone surfin'
Age: 59
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don't know much about that outofwhack, is that what they get up to?
gingernut is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 09:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 38
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spot on Capt Pit Bull. You're completely safe.
David Horn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.