Why commercial airline pilots now are allowed to........
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why commercial airline pilots now are allowed to........
allowed to wear corrective lenses while flying but the old-time aviation authorities requires pilots to have perfect vision? it baffles me anytime...
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By statute, corrective lenses were OK - however your vision must be corrected to near 20/20. Anything below required a rare vision waiver. (US laws)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry BB400, I may have oversimplified my answer - - there was an uncorrected vision limitation pre-1980s (or so) for a Class 1 medical.
This is no longer a requirement.
There (are?) were limitations on USN and USAF fighter pilots having 20/20 vision - that rule had changed my career path for the better
Cheers
This is no longer a requirement.
There (are?) were limitations on USN and USAF fighter pilots having 20/20 vision - that rule had changed my career path for the better
Cheers
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
20/20 vision being perfect vision is a commonly held belief.
It is wrong (I believe )
20/20 vision mean that you can se at 20 feet what the average person can see at 20 feet. [= 6/6 in metres].
So 20/15 is better than 20/20 ie. you can see at 20 ft what Mr Average sees at 15 ft.
It is wrong (I believe )
20/20 vision mean that you can se at 20 feet what the average person can see at 20 feet. [= 6/6 in metres].
So 20/15 is better than 20/20 ie. you can see at 20 ft what Mr Average sees at 15 ft.
TopBunk - quite right.
See here: http://science.howstuffworks.com/question126.htm
I seem to remember my Doc telling me that it was the third line from the bottom of the chart that was 20/20. (Not certain about that).
See here: http://science.howstuffworks.com/question126.htm
I seem to remember my Doc telling me that it was the third line from the bottom of the chart that was 20/20. (Not certain about that).