optical prescription over the years
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
optical prescription over the years
Dear all,
Am due to commence training shortly. I currently just pass the Class 1 unaided - my question is, how much does eye power deteriorate every year? Is there a set pattern? I'm worried about losing my licence, say 5/10 years into flying because my prescription exceeds the limits.
Isn't the limit +/- 5 dioptres? Is this a lot of leeway or what could be easily clocked up by gradual reduction in my optical standards over 5/10 years?
Thoughts if you please.
RSE.
Am due to commence training shortly. I currently just pass the Class 1 unaided - my question is, how much does eye power deteriorate every year? Is there a set pattern? I'm worried about losing my licence, say 5/10 years into flying because my prescription exceeds the limits.
Isn't the limit +/- 5 dioptres? Is this a lot of leeway or what could be easily clocked up by gradual reduction in my optical standards over 5/10 years?
Thoughts if you please.
RSE.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5 dioptres is a lot. My eyesight hasn't deteriorated that much since an RAF medical in 1968 (which I only just passed). My vision is currently just over -1 in each eye and that is with an astigmatism. There are so many factors that it is hard to give an answer. This said, if you use contacts, your vision deteriorates less over time. My mum didn't change her prescription for thirty years.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Blighty
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In middle age, (mid 40's?) the focus mechanism of the eye tends to stiffen somewhat.
This is called a loss of 'accommodation'.
Its why many folk, Mr PM Blair included, find themselves needing reading glasses around that sort of age.
As you can see when shopping in the supermarket, non-prescription reading glasses tend to be in the range +1.25 to maybe +3.0 dioptres.
One of the inferences that I draw from that is that few people in the general population notice/bother about an error of less than 1.25 dioptres...
This is called a loss of 'accommodation'.
Its why many folk, Mr PM Blair included, find themselves needing reading glasses around that sort of age.
As you can see when shopping in the supermarket, non-prescription reading glasses tend to be in the range +1.25 to maybe +3.0 dioptres.
One of the inferences that I draw from that is that few people in the general population notice/bother about an error of less than 1.25 dioptres...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers guys;
effortless - "This said, if you use contacts, your vision deteriorates less over time" - why is this?
...and don't contacts mean a lower strength prescription anyway as they rest on the eye rather than in front of it?
V1R - what are the renewal standards off the top of your head?
WDH - "One of the inferences that I draw from that is that few people in the general population notice/bother about an error of less than 1.25 dioptres..." - but we have to bother with it because the CAA says so don't we?!
Just checking...maybe being a hypochondriac but the effort and money required mean I need to check all this!
RSE
effortless - "This said, if you use contacts, your vision deteriorates less over time" - why is this?
...and don't contacts mean a lower strength prescription anyway as they rest on the eye rather than in front of it?
V1R - what are the renewal standards off the top of your head?
WDH - "One of the inferences that I draw from that is that few people in the general population notice/bother about an error of less than 1.25 dioptres..." - but we have to bother with it because the CAA says so don't we?!
Just checking...maybe being a hypochondriac but the effort and money required mean I need to check all this!
RSE
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
effortless - "This said, if you use contacts, your vision deteriorates less over time" - why is this?
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Between the age of 18 and 40 there is usually very little change in correction needed for those that wear glasses.
Beyond that most people with myopia move a bit towards the less correction needed and often manage reading without any correction, where their previous 'uncorrected' brethren will have to start wearing reading specs.
As said on here before, renewal limits are a lot less stringent than initials. -8 for myopia rings a bell.
Beyond that most people with myopia move a bit towards the less correction needed and often manage reading without any correction, where their previous 'uncorrected' brethren will have to start wearing reading specs.
As said on here before, renewal limits are a lot less stringent than initials. -8 for myopia rings a bell.
Super-Friendly Aviator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reigate, UK
Age: 42
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rse,
Rings a bell too - definately the limit last time I checked. Double-check on the CAA's website to be sure though.
One quick aside - I've often heard myopia can "improve" a little in later years. Is there generally an up/down trend for astigmatism as well?
Cheers,
V1R
As said on here before, renewal limits are a lot less stringent than initials. -8 for myopia rings a bell.
One quick aside - I've often heard myopia can "improve" a little in later years. Is there generally an up/down trend for astigmatism as well?
Cheers,
V1R
The renewal standards for the eyesight test can be found Here
The info you need is about three quarters of the way down the page.
The info you need is about three quarters of the way down the page.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seem to remember that less stringent standards were being mooted for renewals ( I believe the dog had to be 6/6 without correction though!) and I seem to remember the CAA could at their discretion issue a medical "out of limits" in exceptional circumstances i.e. you had been flying 20 years & hadn't bumped into anything yet;sounded like common sense to me.I was told I was just within limits when I did my initial over 30 years ago, and even though I am more "bats eyes" than "cats eyes" I still scrape through.There are many health issues much more likely to catch you in later life than this,wouldn't fixate on it too much.
