Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

Is this justice?

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

Is this justice?

Old 28th May 2019, 10:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 72
Posts: 671
K&C: My interpretation of the report was that the Dr. had been dropped by his agency. It doesn't seem to tell us of his efforts to take up employment with other agencies or even with the NHS. Presumably, the NHS won't be paying inflated salaries so probably not a consideration for the Dr.
I must admit, I didn't spend too long reading the report as it was from the Scum and I could feel my retinas starting to burn out!
As far as this forum goes, I believe it is nought but another excuse to start "w*g bashing". Or perhaps to bash women who choose to wear a veil over their face, for whatever reason.
It struck me that, if a thin piece of fabric over the face interferes with the listener properly hearing the talker, where does the RC confessional rank, with a pierced lump of wood between sinner and priest?
KelvinD is offline  
Old 28th May 2019, 12:17
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Yes.
Posts: 223
.".....to start "w*g bashing"

Funny old world ain't it.
i got sin binned by a mod for 5 6days, a time ago, for impling the W word. I didn't even use the w or g. All i put was ***'*
One rule for one and one for another. Unbiast moderating? Don't think so.

Last edited by Dan_Brown; 28th May 2019 at 16:14.
Dan_Brown is offline  
Old 28th May 2019, 18:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 72
Posts: 678
Originally Posted by KelvinD View Post
K&C: My interpretation of the report was that the Dr. had been dropped by his agency. It doesn't seem to tell us of his efforts to take up employment with other agencies or even with the NHS. Presumably, the NHS won't be paying inflated salaries so probably not a consideration for the Dr.
I must admit, I didn't spend too long reading the report as it was from the Scum and I could feel my retinas starting to burn out!
As far as this forum goes, I believe it is nought but another excuse to start "w*g bashing". Or perhaps to bash women who choose to wear a veil over their face, for whatever reason.
It struck me that, if a thin piece of fabric over the face interferes with the listener properly hearing the talker, where does the RC confessional rank, with a pierced lump of wood between sinner and priest?
No, nothing to do with bashing of any sort. So far as i am concerned, it is all to do with expressing outrage over a doctor being suspended and facing disciplinary action for requesting the removal of a face covering, worn for reasons of religion and that request being an offensive act of discrimination. Given that a doctor does possess more than sufficient intellectual capacity, it would be reasonable to expect that he would have been fully aware and conscious of the reasons why his patient`s chaperon was wearing a veil. Accordingly it would follow he had good reason for it to be removed so that in communicating with her he could carry out a good diagnosis for the patient`s medical complaint. In attempting to do so he ended up yet with another complaint, not medical, but a legal one. So the title of this particular thread is most apt. Is this justice, no I don`t think it is and that is precisely what me and a few others are saying, each in their own peculiar ways.
Chronus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.