Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

Andrew Lansley.

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

Andrew Lansley.

Old 3rd Apr 2018, 08:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Andrew Lansley.

Our former minister who wasted three thousand million pounds on a much-vilified and destructive "reorganisation" of our health service is now a passionate advocate of spending more on cancer diagnosis and IT services.

This Damascene conversion follows his diagnosis of cancer and treatment by the same Health Service he helped propel into it's current state of crisis.

Is there a connection between these events? Discuss.

Last edited by BARKINGMAD; 3rd Apr 2018 at 09:59.
BARKINGMAD is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 11:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,438
Personal experience can drive political action. The reason I put 600 new bike parking spaces into Cambridge city centre was not unconnected with my frustration at never being able to find anywhere to park my bike.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 12:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,065
I understand that the NHS needs more money (although I doubt that it can ever have enough to do everything that could be done for everyone who needs, or wants, it. But why does every discussion centre around 'cuts' when every figure shows it steadily increases in real (inflation adjusted) terms?
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 13:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,130
Originally Posted by Fitter2 View Post
I understand that the NHS needs more money (although I doubt that it can ever have enough to do everything that could be done for everyone who needs, or wants, it. But why does every discussion centre around 'cuts' when every figure shows it steadily increases in real (inflation adjusted) terms?
If a 78 year old woman has to wait for 15 hours for an ambulance after breaking her femur outside her sister's home, there is not enough in the ambulance pot. Saying (as they always do), "This government has increased spending by...", doesn't cut it. We need 'enough' in the system. Your graph shows an increase that isn't 'enough'.

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 13:30
  #5 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 77
Posts: 1,870
Originally Posted by charliegolf View Post
If a 78 year old woman has to wait for 15 hours for an ambulance after breaking her femur outside her sister's home, there is not enough in the ambulance pot.
Not necessarily - AIUI, many ambulances get 'hung up' waiting to unload their patients - instead of being released to go back on the waiting to respond rota.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 13:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Mexico
Posts: 80
Originally Posted by charliegolf View Post
If a 78 year old woman has to wait for 15 hours for an ambulance after breaking her femur outside her sister's home, there is not enough in the ambulance pot. Saying (as they always do), "This government has increased spending by...", doesn't cut it. We need 'enough' in the system. Your graph shows an increase that isn't 'enough'.

CG
But NHS inflation runs at a higher level than the general inflation in the economy - so if you keep trying to blindly meet that 'demand' you end up (eventually) with the NHS consuming the entire economic output of the country.

Given the unlimited demand for the NHS will any increase be 'enough'?
Highway1 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 14:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: London
Posts: 0
Originally Posted by charliegolf View Post
If a 78 year old woman has to wait for 15 hours for an ambulance after breaking her femur outside her sister's home, there is not enough in the ambulance pot. Saying (as they always do), "This government has increased spending by...", doesn't cut it. We need 'enough' in the system. Your graph shows an increase that isn't 'enough'.

CG
So how much is Ďenough?í
whale1776 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 14:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,130
Put another way... is there another first world country that takes 15 hours to get a woman with a broken femur to hospital? (Noted about ambulances getting hung up, but they don't put people in first responder cars, so they aren't hung up at A&E. They didn't send one of those either.)

But NHS inflation runs at a higher level than the general inflation in the economy - so if you keep trying to blindly meet that 'demand' you end up (eventually) with the NHS consuming the entire economic output of the country.
Start with A&E. Work from there- vsi people get saved/have their severe pain eased. Then stick a few billion into old people's nursing care- bingo, beds galore. Now the A&E blockers can be admitted.

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 15:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,065
I fully agree that some priorities seem to be unbalanced, but describing 'not enough money' as a cut seems to me to be intellectually dishonest.

The problem starts with all politicians knowing that to admit openly there never will be funding to do all that is possible is a political suicide note. We need an open and honest debate about what should be the NHS priorities; and whether patients who need treatment caused by their own actions (and how to identify who falls into that category) should self fund, or at least contribute more.
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 15:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 697
The NHS has always been a problem to politicians and however much money is thrown at it, it will remain so. Increasing population, increasing elderly population, more medical treatments, the difficulties go on. The added difficulty being the intransigence of the people involved throughout the monster and the power of the GPs. This within a massive bureaucratic enterprise is the kiss of .....
Some countries manage it far better than we do, often at greater expense to the population. It would need a brave and enlightened politician to provide the answer.
funfly is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 15:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Wiltshire, UK
Age: 69
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by Fitter2 View Post
I fully agree that some priorities seem to be unbalanced, but describing 'not enough money' as a cut seems to me to be intellectually dishonest.

The problem starts with all politicians knowing that to admit openly there never will be funding to do all that is possible is a political suicide note. We need an open and honest debate about what should be the NHS priorities; and whether patients who need treatment caused by their own actions (and how to identify who falls into that category) should self fund, or at least contribute more.
Spot on. Those who deliberately abuse their health and ignore the many warnings about well-proven health risks (and I don't include all the fake health risks that get talked about a lot) should drop down the priority list, and it should be made clear to them that their first priority is to look after their own health, and only when they are unable to do that should the NHS intervene.

I know some will argue that being obese is a disease, and that in a tiny number of cases it may well be, but the majority of people that are obese are so because of their own poor diet choices, and it has been proven that it doesn't cost more to eat healthily than it does to live on junk food, so any argument that it's linked to poverty really doesn't stand up. Poor diet is, much of the time, a personal choice, like smoking or taking drugs, or drinking.

Treating everyone who is obese, a smoker, drug abuser or heavy drinker as if they have a disease seems to me to be just the wrong approach. Some may have an underlying predilection to over-eat, smoke, take drugs or drink, but they will be a small minority. Filtering out those with a genuine medical reason for being like this from those that don't, and then giving priority to treating those with the medical condition, would go a long way to fixing many of the problems, I'm sure.

In case this sounds a bit drastic, I was a heavy smoker and fairly heavy drinker. When the risks to my health were brought home to me following an annual medical when I was 34 years old, and I was given a pretty stern lecture on just how short my life could be if I carried on smoking and drinking to that extent, I stopped smoking and massively cut down on my alcohol intake. I lost weight, found exercise easier and more enjoyable, and my quality of life improved. I suspect that I've probably saved the NHS a fair bit over the 30 odd years since, just as a consequence of that stark warning all those years ago.
VP959 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 16:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 449
... but drug users, alcoholics, smokers and the generally obese AREN'T wanting to do anything other than continue doing what they do.

They need to be "helped" to a better life style that the common sense of the rest of the population guide them to do.

Just how you can persuade people who don't want to change what they do, or to stop them falling back into those habits is the challenge and quite frankly, only those told the brutal truth may change. So do you simply let people self destruct as it were?
Icare9 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 16:22
  #13 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 79
Posts: 16,756
On bed blocking, I bed blocked for over 4 hours when last discharged. At 10am I was cleared to go home, dressed and packed. Left the ward at 1pm to go to the restaurant for lunch and back by 2. Shortly after the pharmacy sent my meds to the ward.

Multiplied up and you have a significant waste of bed space. If I could have got my meds sooner, or gone to an external pharmacy, my bed would have been available sooner.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 16:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,130
Fitter, point of order- I don't think it was me who mentioned cuts was it? I'm on a bit of a rant too- my (family's) experience with the NHS of late has been crap. Maybe time's up?

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 16:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 83
Posts: 55
I never really understood how boob implants qualified for NHS supply and retrofit, but maybe as a mere man I should not say nothing on such a subject.
DType is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 20:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by charliegolf View Post
Put another way... is there another first world country that takes 15 hours to get a woman with a broken femur to hospital? (Noted about ambulances getting hung up, but they don't put people in first responder cars, so they aren't hung up at A&E. They didn't send one of those either.)
Money has very little to do with Ambulance provision. Ambulance provision is completely wasted by people calling who very clearly do not need one, and other forms of timewasters and scrotes who view ambulances as a free taxi service to Hospital. Incredible resources are also tied up waiting for admission to hospital, thus removing the Ambulance from availability for many hours in some cases.


I recall a programme recently when a person trapped in a car had to wait all night for an emergency ambulance because of demands from people who clearly did not need one but were prioritised.


The UK desperately needs to (a) deal swiftly and painfully with timewasters and others who abuse the ambulance service, (b) give notice to regular callers demanding an ambulance that they will no longer be sent one, and (c) start using common-sense to reject what are clearly unnecessary or inappropriate demands for ambulances, e.g. I have a toothache, am drunk, etc, etc.


Finally the legal system needs to deal without mercy against those who abuse and assault Ambulance staff and who vandalise and steal from them whilst the staff are on a call.
Rail Engineer is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 20:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Ilmington, Warwickshire
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by DType View Post
I never really understood how boob implants qualified for NHS supply and retrofit, but maybe as a mere man I should not say nothing on such a subject.
Or infertility either; not exactly a life threatening condition - bet thatíll open a whole new can of worms! Not when weíve got existing humans beings dying because NICE canít release or afford the cost of drugs.

Contentious too, but Iíve had cause to visit A&E several times over the years with family members. Not on a Friday or Saturday night, but afternoon/early evening. The place was quiet. We waited and waited and waited. A couple of staff wandered through, had a chat (hopefully work related) No one seemed to be called. A maximum of two, maybe three other patients were also sitting with us. There was no urgency to attend to any of us. To be fair, there was no profuse amounts of blood spreading across the floor or no agonising screaming but in another other business, itís always considered appropriate not to keep the customer waiting, and if you have to, at least tell them why. It wasnít busy, there was no emergency, which clearly should take priority but hardly rushed off their feet.
BehindBlueEyes is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 21:13
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 83
Posts: 55
Infertility?
Rushing in where angels fear to tread, lesbian couples tend to be infertile, but the NHS solves that one too!!!
Conclusion:- I must be a dinosaur.
DType is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 21:47
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,438
Originally Posted by DType View Post
I never really understood how boob implants qualified for NHS supply
Maybe you've never had breast cancer?
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2018, 21:53
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,065
Fitter, point of order- I don't think it was me who mentioned cuts was it? I'm on a bit of a rant too- my (family's) experience with the NHS of late has been crap. Maybe time's up?
CG
Hi CG. Not you, it was Lansley himself who (having presided as minister at one of the periods of smallest inflation adjusted increases in NHS spending) cited NHS 'cuts'.

It is also the mantra of the Labour party, who left the economy in such a hole that ability to make substantial increases is challenging. They also never provided the NHS with 'enough' money.

The provision of medical services in all their forms is a major problem, and political rhetoric does nothing towards finding solutions.
Fitter2 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.