Just one thing
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Posts: 1,287
Originally Posted by GearDown&Locked
So, so you think you can tell Heaven from Hell, blue skies from pain...
(how's that for plagiarism)
(how's that for plagiarism)
THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW!
PDR
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Posts: 1,287
Originally Posted by John Marsh
So you see, the Universe is just this one particle, travelling so widely and rapidly that it appears next to itself, over and over again.
But if there's only the one particle its fields must be interacting with ITSELF; it must be influenced by its own field when it was in a different position. So what is your explanation for the persistence of the fields - what is the mechanism?
PDR
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 55
Posts: 435
Didn't Hempy point out that a massless particle requires no energy to accellerate it?
E=MC2 does not explain the whole thing. See here
energy - Does $E = mc^2$ apply to photons? - Physics Stack Exchange
E/M = C2 (E divided by M = C squared) if you rearrange the equation, dividing by the mass on both sides
So if mass is zero you are dividing by zero.
So now we are rewriting Number Theory as well as General Relativity. :-)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LPPT
Age: 55
Posts: 431
Originally Posted by PDR1
But if there's only the one particle its fields must be interacting with ITSELF; it must be influenced by its own field when it was in a different position. So what is your explanation for the persistence of the fields - what is the mechanism?
So this particle doesn’t go anywhere it fancies, it’s not free, it has some sort of constraints and limitations -- in itself at least.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Posts: 1,287
Originally Posted by GearDown&Locked
So this particle doesn’t go anywhere it fancies, it’s not free, it has some sort of constraints and limitations
PDR
Last edited by PDR1; 20th Oct 2016 at 13:34.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 133
GD&L:
Precisely. A euphemism for how all is created. Not was created, but is. The Mind which permeates all; which maintains all in existence. The Mind which is all.
I think.
PDR1:
Er...I dunno.
Except to offer that this is a model for how Creation is. Whilst Einstein and all other illustrious figures are clearly within said Creation, I would not necessarily state that they have offered perfect or all-encompassing formulae. Yet.
An intelligent particle (of the Creator)?
I think.
PDR1:
So this one particle has both a charge and a magnetic moment (well it would, and the latter is the relativistic consequence of the former) which produce electric and magnetic fields. The interaction of the electric and magnetic fields are the things which cause matter - they cause atomic structures and energy exchanges.
But if there's only the one particle its fields must be interacting with ITSELF; it must be influenced by its own field when it was in a different position. So what is your explanation for the persistence of the fields - what is the mechanism?
But if there's only the one particle its fields must be interacting with ITSELF; it must be influenced by its own field when it was in a different position. So what is your explanation for the persistence of the fields - what is the mechanism?
Except to offer that this is a model for how Creation is. Whilst Einstein and all other illustrious figures are clearly within said Creation, I would not necessarily state that they have offered perfect or all-encompassing formulae. Yet.
