Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

US Politics Hamsterwheel v2.0

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

US Politics Hamsterwheel v2.0

Old 27th Sep 2018, 14:11
  #15961 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 92
Well alrighty Chuk. we've got Kavanaugh self-identifying and being a drinker in college. Partying. Carousing with the opposite sex, but not going all the way. This is what he's admitted to in past statements, including his yearbook.

NO ONE so far has any TESTIMONY or EVIDENCE. The sources for the Ford material are pictures of her taken by someone else showing her posed in a sexually suggestive way. Also, her words from written material wanting to have sex with at least 54 men before college. These were directly from HER, not from some third party.

You want to know his 'character'? He was a frat-boy in prep school. He was a frat-man in college. He drank liquor underage. He fooled around with girls from the sororities. Maybe he didn't get lucky until law school, maybe he got lucky earlier in college. If that is disqualifying for SCOTUS to you, then I'm ok with your POV. You are a judgmental, rigid, sectarian, control freak who accepts nothing less than mother Theresa on the bench. Of course, that flies right in the face of the platform on the left of anything goes(for lefties like Ellison). Yes, everything Ford and the other slut have said in the media is FAKE NEWS. The purpose of which is to delay, oppose, reject, and resist with any means possible. Thankfully, it's having an effect. The #Walkaway movement is flooded with new members fleeing the Dem party. Keep it up.
ethicalconundrum is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 14:34
  #15962 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 80
Posts: 1,153
obgraham,
So, Turbine:
Can you name a single judge, at any level, who has been subjected to vetting of the nature you outlined in your quote?
Gee, I didn't think I would need to walk you through this baby-style, but I guess I will have to:

Except for the last paragraph that were my words relative to the current situation, the rest are words from Stephen Platt, Founder of The Platt Group. As Concours77 pointed out:
An estimable Foundation.
If you don't understand the word, estimable, look it up in the dictionary.

Speaking of character, in your quote:
The only candidates who might qualify would be the Virgin Mary and maybe Moses. But then, the Supreme Court already has enough Catholics and Jews.
I now think I understand your character better.
https://www.apursuitofjustice.com/th...-a-good-judge/
Turbine D is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 14:39
  #15963 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 92
Oh man, Ford's testimony in front of the senate sounds like she was in a convent. "One evening, after diving practice, I attended a small gathering of friends..." Reading from prepared statement. "I remember, I remember, I remember, I recall, I am sure, I remember". Coached much?
ethicalconundrum is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 16:05
  #15964 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Age: 72
Posts: 1,561
A judge is required to be of good character. Kavanaugh seems to have been lying rather bigly about who he was at Georgetown Prep if he really is someone of good character. Semantics again: compare his self-description in his yearbook and his later, half-joking statement that "What happens at Georgetown, stays at Georgetown," to his latest statements during his Fox News interview (when a Supreme Court candidate doing such an interview shows a real lapse in judgement itself). Something does not add up with those three things, so that it seems that this fellow is a liar, that is, someone not of good character.

To be a successful pilot in Africa, as I have been, often means being a most shameless liar. Well, usually you are lying to some S.O.B. with a gun who is trying to impede you in the prompt performance of your assigned rounds, so that it's either show up late or never, or else fool that bastard into getting out of your way; either speak with a forked tongue or else be a good little altar boy and just sit there until Hell freezes over. Still, a lie is a lie, and no matter the reason why. I lost my absolute respect for speaking truth a long time ago.

Now, how about Brett Kavanaugh? Should he tell the absolute unvarnished truth about what he wrote back then, that it was either somewhat true or else that it was a pack of lies meant to build him up in front of his pack of preppie pals. and then perhaps scupper his chances of bagging the ultimate legal position in the USA? Or should he, umm, prevaricate a bit more in front of a friendly audience and hope that does the trick? Those who want to see him on the Court will go along with his BS, while those who were against him should not be that much more against him, so that he did a pretty good job of fogging whatever the truth of all this might be; he certainly did not come clean.

OB, I agree with what you wrote about various professions; I have no idea where you see me attempting to brush off what you said.

One requirement for holding an FAA ATPL is that you are "of good moral character," whatever that means. I suppose that if you were convicted of certain categories of sexual abuse then, yes, you might find yourself barred from holding that license. I suppose that would be the same for a doctor. Of course it would have to be a lot something a lot worse than whatever Kavanaugh got up to as far as we now know, but then the bar is set much higher for a Supreme Court justice, or at least it should be.

EC, what is your malfunction? Ford, Ramirez and others have spoken of sex abuse done by Kavanaugh: " ... testimony is a form of evidence that is obtained from a witness who makes a solemn statement or declaration of fact."

If I were to state that "EC kicked my dog," that is evidence that EC kicked my dog. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, though. Maybe I don't even own a dog!

Let's imagine that EC is running for Dog Warden of Podunk, so that this matters somewhat. Get me to give my testimony under oath, and send the sheriff around to ask if I do own a dog, and if anyone else saw EC kick my dog. If all that lines up then he's not a suitable candidate for Dog Warden. Or ... none of this happened: I do not even own a dog. Either way, someone needs to investigate on the basis of that evidence. Otherwise Podunk ends up with a Dog Warden some people do not fully trust, because they think he kicks dogs.
chuks is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 17:17
  #15965 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vendee
Posts: 138
Originally Posted by Concours77 View Post

I doubt she will actually testify. On pain of perjury, if she is not truthful, she will be swimming in sweat in no time, stutter, and fail.


Well, I have to admit when I am wrong. I thought that she would not only appear, but that she would comport herself believably and with dignity and authenticity. Now, just as Concours so presciently predicted albeit in wildly unsubstantiated opinion, it seems that she has skipped town and her story is coming to grief--falling in upon itself as would a house of cards.

Oh...what is that? She did appear and she is comporting herself believably and with dignity and authenticity? Good thing I did not listen to unsubstantiated opinion.

BTW, if this is merely a smear campaign then why did the party opposite not go after Justice Gorsuch?
Uncle Fred is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 17:31
  #15966 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 92
Heya Fred,

I'm betting a shot of cheap whisky you've never been through witness prep? Ford has had a full WEEK of full time, multiple experts honing and tuning every word, phrase, and utterance. She working from a prepared script. She's been cross-examined likely 20 times by 3-4 different mock prosecutors. Every action, reaction, and facial gesture has been finely prepared. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

I believe that she believes every word that has been put in her head in the past week by a large cadre of professional Dem operatives(three attys, two counselors and who knows how many coaches).
ethicalconundrum is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 18:53
  #15967 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,054
What a stupid decision by the Republicans to do this cross-examination style with the help of a hired prosecutor, it did not do them any favours. Too bad that they had to resort to that because they only had white old men as committee members to do the questioning instead.

Even FOX of all news channel has this to say:

"Fox News Sunday" moderator Chris Wallace said "this is a disaster for the Republicans."
Nuff said.
virginblue is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 19:06
  #15968 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 3,516
Originally Posted by virginblue View Post
What a stupid decision by the Republicans to do this cross-examination style with the help of a hired prosecutor, it did not do them any favours. Too bad that they had to resort to that because they only had white old men as committee members to do the questioning instead.

Even FOX of all news channel has this to say:



Nuff said.
You don’t understand politics then. Look up the word optics.
West Coast is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 19:10
  #15969 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 92
The alt-left and progs got what they wanted. Damaged image of the Republicans, and some nasty sound bites to see how much of a train wreck they could foment before a big election. I'm sure all the frothing will sway a few votes, but I'm also sure there will be plenty who will see all the sham in this staged drama and say 'WTF?' The Republicans in the senate have done EVERYTHING they can to be considerate. Would the liberals be so engaging if the roles were reversed? Ellison? Hello? Bill Clinton. Who? Lewinsky? Never heard of her.

It's how the game is played. The Republicans got their feet muddy. In the end, the candidate is going to be confirmed, and seated on the bench. By early Nov, no one is going to remember anything about this charade, and Dems are going to keep #Walkaway from the party of elitism, double standards, and partisan dirty tricks.
ethicalconundrum is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 19:39
  #15970 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 3,516
Holy mackerel, Judge Kavanaugh held nothing back. Knowing he likely won’t get any votes from the Democrats allowed him to call it as he sees it.

I like him even more now.

West Coast is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 20:53
  #15971 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Age: 72
Posts: 1,561
I bet that you do!

It's that way that he has with women, right? Hugh Hefner has gone to that big cat-house in the sky, but now there's a new stud on the block. Take it away, Brett!

Ha-ha-ha ... just kidding! What is with this guy? Kavanaugh looks as if he's been formed out of cookie dough.

How about a tag-team match, no holds barred, between Avenatti and Daniels vs. Trump and Kavanaugh? Pay per view on that one would bring in enough to pay off our national debt, I guess.
chuks is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 20:55
  #15972 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,247
Grassley is an embarrassment as committee chairperson. He can't even read his own words or conduct a fair hearing.

It's time that the committee chairmen step aside for polished spokepersons under public televised hearings.


He is as bad as Trump at making points in a debate format. Other than that maybe he can just cast a vote because he doesn't come across to the rest of the US
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 21:49
  #15973 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SF Bay area, CA USA
Posts: 255
A few days ago Judge Kavanaugh spoke and acted as one would expect of a jurist. Today, not so much. The slide has been remarkable.
If he makes it on to the Supreme Court, he will be the gift that keeps on giving for the Democrats.

One can only hope.
jack11111 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 22:09
  #15974 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lakeside
Posts: 428
Originally Posted by West Coast View Post
Holy mackerel, Judge Kavanaugh held nothing back. Knowing he likely won’t get any votes from the Democrats allowed him to call it as he sees it.

I like him even more now.


Howdy. I noticed Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney, (among others) is a man named Michael Bromwich. He was an appointee to the Ocean Project by Obama.

He also represents ....... Andy McCabe. Right, that Andy McCabe, the one who was Strzok’s handler at FBI during the “insurance policy/coup d’etat”.

The assistant Director of FBI....BEFORE HE WAS FIRED FOR LYING.

Interesting?
Concours77 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 22:52
  #15975 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: London/Fort Worth
Posts: 0
Originally Posted by Uncle Fred View Post
BTW, if this is merely a smear campaign then why did the party opposite not go after Justice Gorsuch?

Wasnt the argument that Gorsuch simply replaced an existing right-wing Justice and maintained the existing balance of the court. Kavannagh on the other hand will be replacing a moderate swing vote and will skew the court to the right for a generation.
BAengineer is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 22:58
  #15976 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 3,516
Originally Posted by Concours77 View Post


Howdy. I noticed Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney, (among others) is a man named Michael Bromwich. He was an appointee to the Ocean Project by Obama.

He also represents ....... Andy McCabe. Right, that Andy McCabe, the one who was Strzok’s handler at FBI during the “insurance policy/coup d’etat”.

The assistant Director of FBI....BEFORE HE WAS FIRED FOR LYING.

Interesting?
interesting yes, surprising no. I believe creepy porn star lawyer is in the mix as well.
West Coast is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 23:02
  #15977 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 3,516
Originally Posted by jack11111 View Post
A few days ago Judge Kavanaugh spoke and acted as one would expect of a jurist. Today, not so much. The slide has been remarkable.
If he makes it on to the Supreme Court, he will be the gift that keeps on giving for the Democrats.

One can only hope.
What? Because he's human and is tired of the Senate democrats abusing him? More than ever I now know he can call balls and strikes accurately.
West Coast is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 23:50
  #15978 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lakeside
Posts: 428

Westie,
Point being, Avenatti has no juice in the Agency. Bromwich owns the operators’ manual at FBI. This is why, as part of the project, Bromwich is important, and why the Dems are insisting on an FBI “investigation.” The important part of the equation has to do with induction of a probe into the Ford matter. Once initiated, no Trump nominee could be confirmed before change of seating in the Senate in January. (Should the Dems hit 51 post midterm.)

This seat is existential for pro choice. If the Senate stays D+ Until 2020, we could easily have Ginsberg “light”.

Clinton lost over a billion dollars on Election night, not counting the retainers she had to return to hundreds of “players” in US economy, security roulette.

We remain in the Presidential campaign. It did not stop for the DNC. If they get their evil wish, we will never see another President who has the cojones to rock the tanker of profit and loss (US). Obama redux unto eternity.



Concours77 is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 02:21
  #15979 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 3,516
Originally Posted by Concours77 View Post

Westie,
Point being, Avenatti has no juice in the Agency. Bromwich owns the operators’ manual at FBI. This is why, as part of the project, Bromwich is important, and why the Dems are insisting on an FBI “investigation.” The important part of the equation has to do with induction of a probe into the Ford matter. Once initiated, no Trump nominee could be confirmed before change of seating in the Senate in January. (Should the Dems hit 51 post midterm.)

This seat is existential for pro choice. If the Senate stays D+ Until 2020, we could easily have Ginsberg “light”.

Clinton lost over a billion dollars on Election night, not counting the retainers she had to return to hundreds of “players” in US economy, security roulette.

We remain in the Presidential campaign. It did not stop for the DNC. If they get their evil wish, we will never see another President who has the cojones to rock the tanker of profit and loss (US). Obama redux unto eternity.



oh no, Avenatti is more inmportant to the global perspective than you give him credit for. He’s considering throwing his hat in the ring for 2020. He’s not going away soon.
West Coast is online now  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 04:35
  #15980 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Reading
Age: 37
Posts: 100
Bizarre debate no one knows if he is innocent or not. It does show the depths American politics has sunk too though that every single person's position stems from what they want politically. Not what is right. There should be due process for him, and his accuser. I'm not sure people would write off the accusations easily if they hit their own snowflake buttons.
I

​​​
neila83 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.