Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

War in Australia (any Oz Politics): the Original

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

War in Australia (any Oz Politics): the Original

Old 19th Jul 2013, 12:40
  #6881 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,930
Apparently, the camp at Naru is on fire, including the newly built hospital, and 300 have escaped. Round them all up, and fly them all straight to PNG.
SOPS is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 12:45
  #6882 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 55
Posts: 4,245
If they riot, automatic return to place of origin, no if's, buts or maybe's.

Send the message loud and clear once and for all.


And send a few dead bodies back, that always gets some good media
coverage.
500N is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 12:51
  #6883 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Why oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?
Posts: 1,306
7.30 Report had a longish piece about the history of Krudd and Gillard and their respective stances on the "refugee" problem. Some very pointed comments about the previous stance of Krudd. Quite strange and maybe bears out the whisper that I heard about the Labor dispossessed calling in favours from the MSM.
sisemen is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 13:02
  #6884 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 665
If Rudd doesn't maintain his new "hard man" (yeah, right) stance over the riot, even the ALPBC will be forced to say the hard man stance is fake and all his promises about PNG are fake as well.
Andu is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 13:09
  #6885 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,930
As I am O/S at the moment Sisemen, what was strange about 7.30 towards Rudd? We're they for or against him and his plans?

And this is interesting

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's fresh asylum seeker deal to 'shock' Papua New Guineans - Australia Network News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Last edited by SOPS; 19th Jul 2013 at 13:13.
SOPS is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 13:13
  #6886 (permalink)  
7x7
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 291
From the Herald Sun

THE detention centre on Nauru is on fire as hundreds of people riot in an apparent act of anger against Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's PNG asylum solution.

Witnesses are tweeting reports of violent confrontations between Iranian asylum seekers and there are claims that 15 guards and a police officer have been injured. There were also reports that detention centre staff had temporarily been taken hostage.

Around around 300 of the 500 are said to have escaped.

A Nauruan MP took to state television to call for big, strong men to head to the processing camp as Nauruan riot police were overwhelmed by the the number of rioting asylum seekers.

About 300 Nauruans responded to their leaders' call and there have been reports that a bus carrying setention inmates away had been attacked.

Three interpreters and three medical staff were held for an hour before being released but it was unclear if they had been injured.

There was confusion over the motivation for the riot, with some reports from Nauru suggesting it was linked to the Mr Rudd's hardline announcement. This has not been confirmed, but chants of "freedom" were heard from inside the centre as the riot ignited.

Freelance photographer Clint Deidenang said the chants could be heard coming from inside the detention centre from about 6pm.

Mr Deidenang said he heard up to eight explosions before the flood lights outside the detention centre were smashed.

He tweeted: "Massive fire broke out from with the camp. I can see flames and smokes over the tree tops from my position.''

Witness Daisy Lewis reports on twitter that "two districts'' had been evacuated after the explosions.

She said all Nauruan males had been called in to help bring the riot under control.

"Escaped asylum seekers heading for tank farm. Rumours of planned explosion at far. Locals and police trying to block off.''

Australian Immigration and Citizenship Department spokesman Sandi Logan tweeted: "Transferees at #Nauru RPC were agitating on/off this week about their situation. Today's non-compliance part of that.''
7x7 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 13:18
  #6887 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 55
Posts: 4,245
Maybe it shows that Rudd's policy is on the right track if it pisses them off.


I really want to see if it stops boats coming because they had a people smuggler
on the ABC the other day and he was saying everything ip to that point would NOT stops people getting on boats.

I wonder what his view is now ?
500N is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 13:19
  #6888 (permalink)  
7x7
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 291
I think this lady from the Pickering Post might be on the money.

Sandra Elmington
I have been thinking about this Rudd move re PNG. So as a boat smuggler I have already broken through his move.
Here is what I am going to do. IT has been broadcast already that NO CHILDREN OR WOMEN will be sent to PNG in this deal. So only single men. Also that its been leaked that its about 3,000 that they can take. (that has been said, i saw it on the news tonight, and Rudd pretty much said Shhhhh dont say it so loud but admitted it.)

So this is what Im going to do. I am going to put ONLY women and children on my boats from Indonesia. I will tell the husbands and men to wait there. The women will get through and then call upon the family reunion function on offer.

It will take the govt ages to fill up the 3,000 on PNG because we wont be sending any 'eligibles'. No skin off our noses... our trade continues. The husbands will get to fly to Aust to join their wives and children. Thats fine by us. Easier to control the bitches on the boat, must more passive.

So... the trade goes on, undisturbed as usual.

So...now you see...his solution has been dashed. Its over. And now (says I), thousands of women and children will now be floating in the sea, their bodies bloated and rotting, and there will be ONE MAN TO BLAME. Kevin RUDD will have been responsible for what is to come. Mark my words, cut and paste this, because this is what is coming. Women and children in boats sinking en masse.
7x7 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 13:45
  #6889 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 9,957
Hmmm...no response from the True Believers...odd. Oh, they must be looking up on the internet for evidence of that Tony Abbott chap giving incorrect change when he worked at the Baker as a lad!

Last edited by Buster Hyman; 19th Jul 2013 at 13:46.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 14:19
  #6890 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 730
And there you have modern labor in a nutshell.

Good politics for short term gain followed by piss poor policies and implementation for long term pain.

Nothing's changed since 2007.
CoodaShooda is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 15:22
  #6891 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 65
If only tony had worked at the bakers as a lad then at least he would have some business experience.
Get used to Kevin being a politician, it is after all what those people do.
Now someone mention to Tony he should move on from the fire truck posing and produce replies with a bit of substance, maybe whilst riding a cycle
heated ice detector is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 15:47
  #6892 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 55
Posts: 4,245
"Refugee advocates said they would examine the legality of Mr Rudd's changes, despite Attorney General Mark Dreyfus' assurances the changes abide by the Refugee Convention."

WGAF if it does or doesn't, we should leave it if it doesn't then we don't need
to abide by it, problem solved.

"Greens leader Christine Milne said it was ''absolutely immoral'' for a rich nation like Australia to ''dump thousands of vulnerable people into an impoverished country''."

I don't think Christine has worked out that apart from the tied on few,
the majority in Aus really don't GAF about them and the refugees anymore.


The bleating from the bleeding heart soft cocks lefties should be good over the next week as they ramp up outrage in the media.

Wonder why they aren't complaining of the 1000 dead at sea because
of the soft policies since Howard ?

Last edited by 500N; 19th Jul 2013 at 15:50.
500N is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2013, 23:43
  #6893 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 665
The moment the first injured (and even moreso, the first uninjured) rioter from Nauru arrives on Australian soil - (my guess, that will be within the next 24 hours) - the new tough-on-country-shoppers Kevin reverts to same old, same old Kevin.

Except, of course, on the ALPBC, where they're already saying the riot at Nauru "had nothing to do with Mr Rudd's announcement". Which I suppose is technically correct - it had everything to do with what they thought he'd said.

The ALPBC is also doing a major "nothing to be seen here, move along, calm has been restored" line in downplaying the riot.
Andu is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2013, 00:07
  #6894 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 9,957
produce replies with a bit of substance


Oh, the irony!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2013, 00:23
  #6895 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 543
It'll get really interesting if the Nauruans decide the money they're getting for playing Gulagmeister isn't worth the grief and tell Kev to come and collect the lot of 'em.
MTOW is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2013, 00:43
  #6896 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,207
Rudd has too many enemies within the ALP to risk a date after than the one Gillard nominated, so I reckon he'll go earlier, on time, but not later.
Rudd will be going to G20 on September 5-6 come hell or high water. He's like that. The proposed election date of the 14th is only a week after that, which is tricky if he's out of the country. After that are the footy finals which is even trickier (no party wants a bunch of soggy ballot papers with "King Wal/Laurie Daley" scrawled in between the beer stains, or AFL eqivalent ) so October is looking positive.

The sitting government ( I know you all hate the fact, but that's what they are ) don't have to call an election be held prior to 30th November, so there's plenty of room to move.

Around around 300 of the 500 are said to have escaped.
Can they swim?
Seriously, much as I dislike the Rudd, he's playing to the crowd with this one. Not the lefty greenie crowd, because IMO he's correctly summed them up as a minority within Labor supporters. The average Labor supporter is not in favour of economic boat immigrants or the criminals who facilitate their arrival, as he was last time. Like Beattie, he's Changed .

He's also figured out in a matter of days that the bulk of Labor voters are not Greens voters. Gillard and Co never figured this out and wondered why pretty much everyone hated them.

Always remember; Rudd is Qld ALP. Right wing Labor, and I'm not talking about the nominal faction deliminations. While there was much discussion about wrongful presidential politics wrt Gillard vs Abbott (as opposed to the Coalition vs the ALP) there seems to be a lot of similar discussion on here about Rudd vs Abbott, albiet with Rudd having the better poll figures.

Is this about Leader vs Leader or Party vs Party? Back last week when 'we' had the unpopular leader it was all about the party, but this week it seems to be back to the leader, ie why Rudd is Bad. Let's talk about parties, and why us average bogans should consider voting Liberal (as we did en masse for Howard pre his work-choices annihilation).

Instead of the relentless 'why Labor is bad' campaign, isn't it time for a 'why the Coalition is good' campaign? Seriously, they're shaping up as the world's biggest whingers. With the vacuum of actual party policy, at the moment all I'm hearing is threats and intimidation from the various business councils and mining magnates about how I should be grateful to have a job.

Yeah, I'm grateful. And they should be grateful that I work hard, bury the bodies and help keep their business afloat so they can skite to the shareholders. It works both ways, but not really. Give and take is seen as a sign of weakness by many corporate types. Make allowances once, and they'll screw you further. Like the BLF once said; if you don't fight you lose... If there were true give and take then that wouldn't be the case, but there isn't. Antagonism comes from both sides of the table, and there's is currently in opposition.

Sure, some sectors are suffering. We're not good at competing with Chinese/Indian manufacturing of base products. However, I hear even Woolworths and Wesfarmers (among other massively profitable businesses) are currently running the 'times are tough' argument with their workers . When you're a company with 50% of the Australian food and alcohol market (not to mention a sizeable chunk of the fuel and gambling market), ya know what? Times ain't tough. Times are booming, and screwing over your warehouse and distribution staff on pay and conditions isn't winning any friends amongst the swinging voter market. Every time these businesses and Gina & Co jump up against the Labor party, a bunch of potential (and often former) Liberal voters ask themselves ' just what are you planning and where's my share of the profit?'

Last edited by Worrals in the wilds; 20th Jul 2013 at 00:52.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2013, 00:43
  #6897 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 58
Posts: 984
This from news.com.au:
AUSTRALIA will half fund university reforms in Papua New Guinea, the redevelopment of a hospital in Lae and its ongoing costs, and law and order initiatives as well as all resettlement costs for refugees as part of Kevin Rudd's new asylum boat solution. The sweeteners are expected to cost billions, but the camp at Manus Island is a boatload away from being full and the Defence Force will send personnel to the island next week to help boost capacity.
How predictable.
Mr Rudd announced the new policy alongside a contingent of PNG ministers and the Prime Minister, Peter O'Neill.
Boat arrivals claiming refugee status in Australia will instead be sent to Papua New Guinea for assessment and, if found to be refugees, they will be settled there. Mr Rudd said his policy change, which critics have called a "rush to the right," would be expensive, but he was unable to put a price on the aid and asylum resettlement packages but said "that's what friends are for" and later added the policy would be "budget neutral."
So please explain how a plan that is expected to cost billions is “budget neutral”.
Managing almost 30,000 asylum seekers already in detention in Australia or in the community will cost billions over the forward estimates, the new policy to apply to the next boat that arrives. Facilities will not be ready for families until early next year with the first to house 600 to cost more than $130 million.
Opposition Leader Tony Abbott welcomed the idea, which does not require new laws, but added he did not "trust this prime minister and this government to make it work". PNG has a poor record on violence against women and Australia's Foreign Affairs Department has current warnings for travellers of "high levels of serious crime" and warnings that large crowds "may turn violent." Travellers are also warned of high incidence of armed robberies, gang rape, car-jackings, that they should travel in a convoy at night.
Well looking at what is happening in Nauru, they’ll fit right in!
"From now on, any asylum seeker who arrives in Australia by boat will have no chance of being settled in Australia as refugees," Mr Rudd said. "Asylum seekers taken to Christmas Island will be sent to Manus and elsewhere in PNG for assessment of their refugee status, if they are found to be genuine refugees they will be resettled in PNG." He said the refugees would live "safely and security and, in time, prosperity within PNG" with the country a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention. The implementation "will not be smooth," he said and predicted the government would encounter problems.
"The boats are not going to stop coming tomorrow, in fact it is more probably the people smugglers will try and test our resolve for the period ahead," he said.
"We are prepared to do more."
Refugee lawyer David Manne said that under international law, Australia would retain legal obligation to protect asylum seekers sent to PNG.
"Australian retains legal responsibility for the protection of people who seek asylum in Australian and there are sent somewhere else," he said.
Translated means, “we’re going to stay on the asylum seeker gravy train for as long as we can”
Immigration Minister Tony Burke confirmed women and children could not be sent until permanent facilities were built. The government was forced to withdraw families from Manus Island last month, the temporary facilities deemed unacceptable. Children under seven have also not been sent because of Australian health advice they could not be adequately protected against tropical diseases.
Fair enough, I reckon. Although the potential problem here is how long it will take before the facilities are deemed suitable. In the interim, I reckon you will see what has been predicted in post #6917 come to fruition, i.e. a mad rush of boats filled with women and children.
Adult asylum seekers will spend two weeks undergoing health checks before being transferred. "The facilities as they are right now are not appropriate for (women and children,)" Mr Burke said. "We will not be transferring women and children immediately. The intention is as we move the temporary facility to a permanent facility anybody who arrives from now on will be subject to the new rules."
I applaud KRudd’s resolve to do something about the asylum seeker issue, however I note the following:
1. He started it during his first reign when he dismantled Howard’s “Pacific solution”. I find it amazing that the TV media seem to gloss over this fact as part of their unwavering adoration of the Great Leader (no, I’m not really surprised at all).
2. As far as I’m aware, the “Pacific solution” did not cost the billions that KRudd’s scheme is expected to cost. Again, a point studiously ignored by the TV media.
3. The “Pacific solution” and this scheme only address the symptoms and not the cause. The cause is the attraction of seemingly unlimited welfare to people whom have never had access to this privilege. I would like to see a policy whereby access to welfare is only granted to Australian citizens or to genuine refugees.
4. Which brings me to my final point; the screening of refugees must be more thorough. When the Minister for Foreign Affairs states that he thinks that the screening process for refugees needs to be tightened (link on post # 6436 refers), then I reckon something needs to be done. If that means “refugees” needs to stay in detention longer until their claims are adequately examined, so be it.
Captain Sand Dune is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2013, 01:01
  #6898 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: BNE, Australia
Posts: 273
Realistically though, how can you improve screening of refugees if they have no papers and they have fled from a country with no effective government, or at least one which will not provide information about its citizens? Keeping them in detention longer will not enable you to pluck more information from thin air.

Genuine question. Lots of ideas get thrown around in this thread with not a great deal of substance behind them. The coalition seems to have the same problem
chuboy is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2013, 01:39
  #6899 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: utopia
Posts: 107
A genuine refugee ,should by rights, be happy to live anywhere other than where hes come from.
Its quite obvious the boats are full of folks wanting to be only on the shores of Aust.
The money they pay people smugglers in Indonesia is a small fortune compared to the wealth of most Indonesians.
Its already been shown the Sri Lankans only want to come to Aust for more money etc.
I doubt many would want to live in PNG.
By rights it should stop a lot of boats once word gets back home.
Pappa Smurf is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2013, 02:31
  #6900 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 58
Posts: 984
Chuboy,

Fair enough question. My first suggestion is no papers = no asylum and send 'em back. Many of these "asylum seekers" seem to have the wherewithal to come up with thousands to pay for the boat ride to welfare Nirvana, yet they can't furnish identification? In my view, asking for identification from a potential asylum seeker in a reasonable request.
There seems to be a heavy weight of anecdotal evidence form varying sources that our "asylum seekers" destroy their passports etc on first contact with Australian authorities anyway.
Secondly, I reckon there should be a time limit in which the identification of a potential asylum seeker can be verified. If we cannot establish who they are within a period of time to be determined, send 'em back.
And abolish the family re-union policy loophole!
Captain Sand Dune is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.