Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Italian Forum
Reload this Page >

Fresca fresca di oggi

Wikiposts
Search

Fresca fresca di oggi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Sep 2010, 11:42
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: World
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1) SENZA corso ATPl Jar NON si può fare un'abilitazione su macchina multicrew, cosa che i 6 suddetti faranno.
E dove sarebbe scritto questo? Non mi risulta.

JAR–FCL 1.250

Type rating, multi-pilot – Conditions (See AMC FCL 1.261(d)) (See Appendix 1 to JAR- FCL 1.261(d))
[(See Appendix 1 to JAR- FCL 1.520 & 1.525)]
(a) applicant for the first type rating course for a multi- pilot aeroplane type shall:
[ ][(1) (i)have at least 70 hours as pilot-in-command of aeroplanes;
(ii) have a valid multi-engine instrument rating (A);
(iii) hold a certificate of sastisfactory completion of multi-crew co- operation (MCC). If the MCC course is to be added to the type rating course (see JAR-FCL 1.261 and 1.262 and AMC FCL 1.261(d) and Appendix 1 to JAR-FCL 1.261(d), this requirement is not applicable; and
(iv) have met the requirements of JAR-FCL 1.285, or
(2) Be a student currently undergoing training on a MPL(A) integrated training course.]
(b) Applicants having:
(1) either a certificate of satisfactory completion of MCC in accordance with JAR- FCL 2 and experience of more than 100 hours as a pilot of a multi-pilot helicopter, or
(2) experience of more than 500 hours as a pilot on multi-pilot helicopter, or (3) experience of at least 500 hours as a pilot in multi-pilot operation in accordance with JAR-OPS on single pilot- aeroplanes JAR/FAR 23 multi-engine aeroplanes, shall be considered to meet the requirements of MCC;
(c) The level of knowledge assumed to be held by holders of the PPL(A) or CPL(A) and type ratings for multi-pilot aeroplanes issued under requirements other than JAR–FCL will not be a substitute for showing compliance with the requirements of (4) above.
(d) The issue of an additional multi-pilot type ratings requires a valid multi-engine instrument rating.
dirk85 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 12:55
  #42 (permalink)  
lebowsky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
@Bio161

si una volta da giovane ci ho anche pensato a diventare un controllore.
Non ho capito comunque la tua affermazione.
Se vuoi spiegarmela,anche in privato se ti va.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.