Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Interviews, jobs & sponsorship
Reload this Page >

license not current still able to be employed?

Wikiposts
Search
Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

license not current still able to be employed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jul 2012, 17:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: keeps changing
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
license not current still able to be employed?

Hope someone can help me out and shed some light

I got a job offer unfortunately i haven't flown in 5 months so my FAA CPL license is not current and they dont fly N registered aircraft.. one thing they ask is that you are current. Problem is I'm in Sri Lanka at the moment and cant see how I'm going to be able to find a N registered aircraft to do the 3 take offs and landing to get current.

So was wondering would it still be possible to send them the application get my license validated where ill be doing the flying and fly a non N registered aircraft do the 3 t/o and landings and then continue with their training...

or do i need to get current?

Thanks for your help
Clintonb is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2012, 18:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mare Nostrum
Age: 41
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FARs do not say that the takeoffs and landings must be done in an N-registered aircraft. It does not say that you have to be PIC for those takeoffs or landings. It just says that you must be "sole manipulator of the controls" during those takeoffs and landings.

Go find an aircraft, get another pilot or instructor to go with you, but you perform the landings and takeoffs. As you can see, it says you can't have people on board except for those "necessary for the conduct of flight". So... another pilot who is current and legal to fly the plane, an instructor, etc...

FAR 61.57
Recent flight experience: Pilot in command.

(a) General experience.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, no person may act as a pilot in command of an aircraft carrying passengers or of an aircraft certificated for more than one pilot flight crewmember unless that person has made at least three takeoffs and three landings within the preceding 90 days, and--

    (2) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a person may act as a pilot in command of an aircraft under day VFR or day IFR, provided no persons or property are carried on board the aircraft, other than those necessary for the conduct of the flight.
    zondaracer is offline  
    Old 5th Jul 2012, 18:36
      #3 (permalink)  
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Mar 2010
    Location: keeps changing
    Posts: 117
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Great thats good to know. Will go to the airport tomorrow and get myself a Sri Lankan instructor and plane added bonus to my trip here. Thanks a lot zondaracer..
    Clintonb is offline  
    Old 6th Jul 2012, 00:45
      #4 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Apr 2007
    Location: London, Berlin, Bucharest
    Posts: 284
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    I would advise you come to an agreement with the instructor that you can log it as P1 if all goes well, before you take off.

    Its better to have it as P1 in your log book "just in case" someone else reads the rulesin another way!
    Nashers is offline  
    Old 14th Jul 2012, 11:55
      #5 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Feb 2006
    Location: On the Chiropractor torture table.
    Posts: 36
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Sole manipulator of the flight controls does not require you to be PIC, just licensed, or rated or certified on the type or class of aircraft being used.
    Further more unless this fellow has a validation from the Sri-Lankan authorities allowing him to be the PIC of a Sri-Lankan registered aircraft, he may not log anything as PIC. It wouldn't matter if the instructor pilot agreed with who was acting PIC or not. Hope this is clear because the law very much isn't, especially when we deal with international multi license and registration issues!

    Last edited by Harmattan96; 14th Jul 2012 at 21:36.
    Harmattan96 is offline  
    Old 7th Aug 2012, 18:59
      #6 (permalink)  
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Mar 2010
    Location: keeps changing
    Posts: 117
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    thanks very much for the information.. was a big help thanks again
    Clintonb is offline  

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

    Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.