Wikiposts
Search
Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

King Air time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Mar 2008, 11:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: L`Europe
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
King Air time

Here goes my question: How valuable does jet airlines in general think King Air time is? Lets say a 1000hrs+ in multicrew. I`m asking cause I`ve heard lots of contradictory stories about this, probably rumours aswell, so if you have any real life experiences please feel free.
Wertzy is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 11:32
  #2 (permalink)  
Educated Hillbilly
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: From the Hills
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It varies between airline to airline. If the Kingair is opeated on a multi crew AOC then it is recognised as multi crew time. Some airlines will recognise this (ie: Easyjet who require 500 hours of multi crew experience for the).


However British Airways request 1000 hours on turboprops over 10 tonnes for direct entry FOs on to the Short haul fleet, therefore the Kingair time would not be count towards this requirement. So I think this is where you may have derived this rumour from.

To be honoust if you get offered a job on a King Air operated multi crew then take it if you have no other options, multi crew time in a King Air is far more valuable than VFR instruction. The majority of operators will view multi crew time even if it is multi crew ops in a single pilot aircraft as good exeprience.

Also remember some operators as an insurance requirement will carry a safety pilot on a King Air; in this instance the aircraft is still operated as a single crew aircraft and the second pilot / safety pilot is not able to log the time (the safety pilot does not need to be rated either). Though that said most operators still consider safaty pilot experience as a plus point on the CV.
portsharbourflyer is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 13:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It varies between airline to airline. If the Kingair is opeated on a multi crew AOC then it is recognised as multi crew time. Some airlines will recognise this (ie: Easyjet who require 500 hours of multi crew experience for the).
Is the end of that sentance for the TRSS (Type rating sponsorship scheme)?

If so do you have any ideas about what type of A/C are acceptable to count towards this time, as their website is not too specific?

Thanks
BRS_flyer is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 15:23
  #4 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's got to be more useful on your CV than hour building in Florida in a C28/PA152.
IRRenewal is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 16:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Educated Hillbilly
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: From the Hills
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BRS, yes sorry I did forget to complete my sentence and you are correct SSTR scheme.

I had a colleague that was interviewed at Easyjet on the grounds of 500 hours of multi crew time in a JAR 23 aircraft (Twin Otter).

Last edited by portsharbourflyer; 28th Mar 2008 at 16:50.
portsharbourflyer is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 16:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought EZY insisted on 500h MPA being from med turbo props and heavier (5700Kg+) but recognised light jet time. Could be mistaken, but here's what their site says:

In order to join easyJet under the TRSS you must have a minimum of 500 hours Multi-crew commercial experience on either a:

Medium to heavy turbo prop
Light jet
Emb145/BAe146/Avro RJ
Military Fast Jet / Multi crew Rotary or Heavy Transport
HN1708 is online now  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 16:52
  #7 (permalink)  
Educated Hillbilly
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: From the Hills
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HN1708, just edited my previous post to reflect the information you have provided, ie: removed the last sentence stating any multi crew time was recognised. Thanks.

Last edited by portsharbourflyer; 29th Mar 2008 at 18:37.
portsharbourflyer is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 16:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure people have got in with other than what's stated on their website ;-)

Might sound pedantic as well as sarcastic now but is a Twotter not a light TP?
HN1708 is online now  
Old 28th Mar 2008, 17:56
  #9 (permalink)  
Educated Hillbilly
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: From the Hills
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HN, you are correct a Twin Otter is under 5700 kg therefore is a light TP.
portsharbourflyer is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2008, 15:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silly question, I know: but does the 5700kg figure refer to unladen weight or MTOW

Just wanted to double check
BRS_flyer is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2008, 15:37
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: L`Europe
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5700kg MTOW.
My question was regarding MPO AOC by the way.
Wertzy is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2008, 17:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SSE of smoki
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

a good friend of mine joined BA back in approx 98 on the 757. He went from instructing on light aircraft to the king air, then BA.

He was a little concerned on day one in BA when asked to confirm what type of aircraft he had been flying !!.

Seems he might have been lucky if the same experience as mentioned above was in place then.

Rgds.
Khaosai is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.