Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Interviews, jobs & sponsorship
Reload this Page >

type rating or not? What do you think?

Wikiposts
Search
Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

type rating or not? What do you think?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Nov 2004, 17:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile type rating or not? What do you think?

It will be better to make a type rating even if you''ve got only 300hrs of PISTON ENGINES?
djchandler is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2004, 09:44
  #2 (permalink)  
MJR
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Worcs UK
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No! No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No! No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No! No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No! No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No! No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!No!


cheers

MJR
MJR is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2004, 10:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,077
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Why have you written o!N a hundred times.

Explain please. (And should we pay for line trg too?!?)
Training Risky is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2004, 11:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to my calculations its 118 times exactly
Kerropi is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2004, 18:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all you have to do is put yourself in mr 50 year old senior management pilot sitting behind a desk staring out the window waiting for his penison to rock up so he can leave....and think, I f I was him...would i prefer a bloke/ess to have a type rating or not? He will be cheaper, less of a risk..in fact, yes less of a risk, cos i cant be bothered with my boss giving me grief if he fails.

And then i have a load less cv's to look through.
And it shows he can meet the grade.

Seems clear cut to me, what these people want. Either put yourself in that place... or dont. If you cant... well that is just the world we live in. Hay ho.
easyswimmer is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2004, 21:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Egcc
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems clear cut to me, what these people want
Well, what if the company have their own tie up with a TRTO and they get a cut for supplying the clients? Won't be so keen on your type rating then.

What if they fly a type you don't have? Not going to be quite as keen then.

What if it's a turbo-prop outfit and you have a jet type rating with no hours on type? Won't be so keen on your type rating then either, or the prospect of you hanging around long enough to make it worthwhile taking you on.

What if they prefer all their pilots to have gone through their own TR training? Negates much of the (perceived) advantage of having the type rating.

What if you don't get a job with your type rating and just under 12 months has passed and you get called for a sim ride? Still reckon you'd perform as well as a current-on-type pilot?

What happens if you still can't get a job?

PP

(just playing Devil's Advocate)


ps As for 'proving you can make the grade', plenty of pilots have failed line training........I know of a couple personally.
Pilot Pete is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.