CTC - only one company- good or bad?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fukuoka, Japan
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CTC - only one company- good or bad?
The thing is that I don't want any more companies to join CTC because they willl dominate the market. This isn't fair to us because if the company is alledegdley not up to scratch with what people are saying then we're shafted. We want at least some to choose from - not just one!
Note alledgedlely. (how the spelling is I dont give a ******) We want something or someone to do something to bloody recify the problem we have. This may take time- I know, but in the short term companies are saying nothing and inexperienced pilots like me are going elsewhere (jobs in London and the like).
Companies will reply with tales of woe such as political pressures and market pressures etc.... but- if people want to travel then really whats there really to stop them? - a bad marketing plan and hearsay?
anyway- enough and I hope things work out well for you......
What can we do?
big
Note alledgedlely. (how the spelling is I dont give a ******) We want something or someone to do something to bloody recify the problem we have. This may take time- I know, but in the short term companies are saying nothing and inexperienced pilots like me are going elsewhere (jobs in London and the like).
Companies will reply with tales of woe such as political pressures and market pressures etc.... but- if people want to travel then really whats there really to stop them? - a bad marketing plan and hearsay?
anyway- enough and I hope things work out well for you......
What can we do?
big
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Egcc
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Companies will reply with tales of woe such as political pressures and market pressures etc.... but- if people want to travel then really whats there really to stop them
Airlines employ pilots based on their crewing ratio per airframe. The more airframes they have the more pilots they employ. The better they roster then the lower the crewing ratio can be. Airlines are not charities and they don't employ more pilots just to provide employment or training for people who have spent a lot of money getting a licence.
I fail to see what this has to do with CTC having a 'monopoly' (your implication). They just supply a product (of a certain quality) which the market desires. If you want other players in that market to create competition then yes I agree that may be beneficial. If you think it gives Wannabes a better chance, then statistically it may do, but the demand from the airlines will be finite for that product and it doesn't matter how many players are supplying the product, they will still only take so many. The other thing to remember is that if one doesn't make the grade with one of these companies, then they may not make it with another either.
This isn't fair to us because if the company is alledegdley not up to scratch with what people are saying then we're shafted.
We want something or someone to do something to bloody recify the problem we have.
and inexperienced pilots like me are going elsewhere (jobs in London and the like)
Nobody has to change CTC's approach to low hours pilot selection. They do a bloody good job of supplying a quality product. If someone doesn't make the grade then they should learn from the experience, not just get sour grapes. Perhaps a little work by way of research and practice before the selection could have reaped benefits?
The industry owes no-one a job. No industry does. If the competition is too stiff then perhaps people are making the right decision to leave, just too late to be a financially sound one, but what they are doing is just making it easier for the dedicated.
If you think that guys who are highly qualified through education are leaving to go elsewhere, then this is not an insurmountable problem. There are plenty of pilots in the UK market who don't have degrees or even 'A' levels. The fact remains there are too many qualified pilots chasing too few jobs. Disappearing to the City may be seen as their gain, but in the current market it is no airlines' loss.
I wish you well
PP