Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > French Forum
Reload this Page >

AF6622 dual hydraulic failure

Wikiposts
Search

Notices

AF6622 dual hydraulic failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th October 2013 | 08:49
  #1 (permalink)  
nyt
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
From: France
AF6622 dual hydraulic failure

Hello,
I am surprised nobody talked about AF6622 (A320) dual hyd failure on ORY-NCE flight oct. 16th, requiring pilots to divert to LYS and drop landing gear manually.
Only press (in french) available plus a few tweets:
Grosse frayeur sur un vol Paris-Nice, atterrissage d?urgence à Lyon « AIRNEWS.FR
Thanks for those who have more info as it is quite a serious event in my book (assuming the above are facts).
nyt is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2013 | 09:13
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 189
From: Dorset UK
I was part of the crew of an A300B4 that had a dual hydraulic failure and diversion about 2 years ago.
I doubt anyone outside the company except the Aviation Authority knew about it.
Why, just because it was Air France, should it generate a discussion on here.
dixi188 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2013 | 11:18
  #3 (permalink)  
PBY
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Around the corner
Wow. So Air France had 2 dual hydraulic failures in 2 years? Isn't that little too often? I actually don't care if it is Air France or Bangladesh airlines, but is there a problem with Air France maintenance?
PBY is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2013 | 13:21
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 189
From: Dorset UK
Just to keep the facts correct, the A300B4 was not Air France but the yellow and red parcel operator.
dixi188 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2013 | 07:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Montpellier (France)
AF6622 dual hydraulic failure

Hi Dixii 188 !
May be , in fact surely we knows each other !
I was also operating the yellow B4 !
Cheers
Michel
Michel34 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2013 | 12:23
  #6 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 189
From: Dorset UK
Michel34

PM sent.
dixi188 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd October 2013 | 08:01
  #7 (permalink)  
nyt
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
From: France
do you mean it's a non-event which us SLF don't need to worry about?
nyt is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd October 2013 | 09:09
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: FR
Well, what is the point of the SLF worrying about?

Failures occur everyday. This one was apparently handled smoothly, as per the OK outcome.
Because this was an emergency situation, you can be assured that the issue will be looked at, in order to prevent its re-occurence.

What else could be said about it?
AlphaZuluRomeo is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 06:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 3
From: Philadelphia PA
What else could be said about it?? It depends on what the assumptions were in certification about the probability (and consequences) of such a failure. Check out the Transportation Safety Board of Canada report on the crash of an S-92 helicopter to see why this is important.
Shawn Coyle is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.