Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Airbridge cargo's fleet starting to be recovered by the lessors

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Airbridge cargo's fleet starting to be recovered by the lessors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Apr 2022, 20:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Airbridge cargo's fleet starting to be recovered by the lessors

AirBridgeCargo fleet starts to break up as lessors demand their aircraft back - The Loadstar


The sad dismantling of a cargo airline is under way, as lessors circle AirBridgeCargo’s fleet.

The carrier is treading a fine line between the demands of Russia’s aviation authority to keep the aircraft, while also attempting – in part – to satisfy lessors instructed to retrieve them.

BOC Aviation had three leases with AirBridgeCargo (ABC). One aircraft, worth $148m according to court documents, was leased for $1.2m a month but has been returned. BOC succeeded in retrieving it from Hong Kong Airport, which it claimed was an unsuitable place to store an aircraft, and has flown it to San Bernadino.

Despite an order by BOC on 5 March to ground its three aircraft in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Zhengzhou, ABC flew one to Moscow, while another was diverted to Dubai – where BOC tried to ground it again – before it went on to Russia.

ABC told BOC by telephone on 8 March it would refuse to return the two aircraft in Russia until BOC allowed the third to leave Hong Kong, BOC claimed in a court document.
In a letter, ABC noted: “Aircraft could not be moved outside Russia until the customs clearance with Russian customs authorities has been completed. A breach of this requirement could expose the aircraft to customs arrest or other customs lien.

“Moreover, we inform you that Russian aviation authorities issued the document requiring prior authorisation for any movement of any aircraft operated by any Russian carrier outside Russia. In this respect, [the] lessee must also obtain the approval of the Russian aviation authorities in order to be legally able to proceed as requested in the termination notice. We hereby confirm that the lessee makes all reasonable efforts to make everything possible to comply with lessor’s requests in accordance with the termination notice. We are also open to the discussion on the above matters at all times.”

The two aircraft remain in Russia.

BCC Equipment Leasing, meanwhile, has managed to retrieve three engines, but not the airframe and a fourth engine.

Court documents show that BCC, which owns one of ABC’s 747-8Fs and its four GE engines, had leased them to Lilac Wing, which in turn leased them to AirBridgeCargo.

The insurance coverage for Russia, Belarus and Crimea was invoked on 2 March, yet a day later, the aircraft flew from Moscow to Vientiane, before going on to Hong Kong, arriving on 4 March. Two days later, ABC flew the aircraft – equipped with just one of BCC’s engines and other spare engines – to Krasnoyarsk and then to its hub in Sheremetyevo, Moscow.

ABC told BCC that the aircraft had been removed from commercial operations, but it could not be removed from Russia without the approval of Russia’s aviation authorities.

BCC noted: “There is a grave risk the aircraft will be expropriated by the Russian government at any time moment, without due process, without just compensation and without recourse to a practical legal remedy.”

Two of the engines are in Hong Kong and a third in Scotland, at MRO facilities, both of which have agreed to return them to the lessors, while ABC has acknowledged that its lease is terminated. BCC has now voluntarily dismissed its case.

ABC appears to have a total of 13 aircraft on lease, according to aviation databases: four are on lease from Russia; Aircastle has two; Aviation Capital Group has one; DAE Capital owns its 777; and Gecas owns two.

No doubt the returned aircraft will shortly return to service, under a new name, in this capacity-constricted market.
NutLoose is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.