AN-225 - it's BIG!
Thread Starter

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 806
Likes: 2
From: 59°09N 002°38W (IATA: SOY, ICAO: EGER)
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Colchester
AN-225 - it's BIG!
As stated on the website, that machine has flown since 1988. Where have you been all this time.
The "factoids" are more a collection of rumour and supposition. Yes, there was thought of using Mriya as a first-stage booster-but for HOTOL, never Buran (Buran unlike the STS did not have its own rocket engines, and neither had large fuel tanks, hence the large external tank.)
Comparing jet engines to HP outputs...really...
Annnnd...747-Fs DO have nose loading...
The "factoids" are more a collection of rumour and supposition. Yes, there was thought of using Mriya as a first-stage booster-but for HOTOL, never Buran (Buran unlike the STS did not have its own rocket engines, and neither had large fuel tanks, hence the large external tank.)
Comparing jet engines to HP outputs...really...
Annnnd...747-Fs DO have nose loading...

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 16
From: -
Has anyone got any idea why its crew includes a navigator and radio operator? I would have thought that their roles would have died out in the 1970's whilst this aeroplane was built in the late 80's albeit related to a late 1970's design.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 0
Likes: 2
From: Southwater
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Ormond Beach
Originally Posted by skydiver69
Has anyone got any idea why its crew includes a navigator and radio operator? I would have thought that their roles would have died out in the 1970's whilst this aeroplane was built in the late 80's albeit related to a late 1970's design.



Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Went on board when it displayed at Farnborough. Inside was a kitchen table covered with empty bottles (wine/spirits) and a few kitchen type chairs around it.
This rather wrecked my Flying Display programme as it was supposed to be flying that day - needless to say it didn't; the company apparently couldn't afford the fuel even though BAe had offered to pay.
Climbed the ladder to the flight deck; the only permanent seats were for the pilots, the FE station had an old armchair!!
This rather wrecked my Flying Display programme as it was supposed to be flying that day - needless to say it didn't; the company apparently couldn't afford the fuel even though BAe had offered to pay.
Climbed the ladder to the flight deck; the only permanent seats were for the pilots, the FE station had an old armchair!!
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Thank you *very* much for the link!
I've never seen such a detailed report on the -225 before.
Could very much be an apocryphal tale, but I had heard that one of the more superfluous crewmembers onboard (perhaps in this instance, the radio operator) was a political commissar, to prevent pilots from defecting with what was then the pride of the Soviet Air Force.
Has anyone got any idea why its crew includes a navigator and radio operator? I would have thought that their roles would have died out in the 1970's whilst this aeroplane was built in the late 80's albeit related to a late 1970's design.
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
A few years back someone hired it to take a whole seismic crew, including 4 big vib. trucks and the recording truck, to Oman. Just drove on , tied down and took off.
It flew from Budaapest I think to Seeb - cost a fortune but saved months of stripping the vehicles down, loading them on a boat and then rebuilding and recalibrating all the hydraulics and electronics on arrival
understand they were in operation 4 days after leaving Hungary..........
It flew from Budaapest I think to Seeb - cost a fortune but saved months of stripping the vehicles down, loading them on a boat and then rebuilding and recalibrating all the hydraulics and electronics on arrival
understand they were in operation 4 days after leaving Hungary..........




