MD-80 Freighter
Thread Starter
MD-80 Freighter
Converted MD-80 lifts off on maiden flight
15 orders 'lined up' with customers based in the USA, South America, Africa, the Middle East and Europe, and 'ultimately predicts demand for as many as 200'.
15 orders 'lined up' with customers based in the USA, South America, Africa, the Middle East and Europe, and 'ultimately predicts demand for as many as 200'.
I see one major advantage of the MD-80 freighter over a 737; much easier access for loading equipment, and far less chance of damage to the #1 engine. Another couple of slight advantages would be less chance of FOD ingestion when visiting unimproved (or deteriorating) airports, plus the lower ACN, enabling visits to a lot more airports.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All secondary advantages hardly can beat primiary disadvantages: fuel burn, non-standard ULDs and possibly tricky W&B. I would be surprised to see any sizeable demand.
Last edited by CargoOne; 6th Oct 2012 at 09:16.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 77
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"After conversion the aircraft can carry twelve 88”x108” or eight 125”x88” ULDs or eight 125”x96” ULDs. This is the world’s first MD-80 passenger to freighter conversion."
http://www.aeronautical-engineers.com/aei_specsheet_md80.pdf
http://www.aeronautical-engineers.com/aei_specsheet_md80.pdf
Actually, it's closer to an Electra than a 737. You can load 125 laterally on a 737, but only longitudinally on a MD80 (and Electra, among others).
I appreciate the conflict between loader and no. 1 engine on a 737-300 is an issue; we've had 3 nacelle damages in 2 years. But from my point of view that's just about the only advantage the MD80 has over the 737, and I'm not sure that's enough.
I appreciate the conflict between loader and no. 1 engine on a 737-300 is an issue; we've had 3 nacelle damages in 2 years. But from my point of view that's just about the only advantage the MD80 has over the 737, and I'm not sure that's enough.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always like to see an STC for a new cargo aircraft but wonder about marketability. Other than the aircraft being extremely inexpensive to buy upfront. I had wondered about all of the B717's hitting the bone yard, I know a few start up pax operators have picked some up. They are shorter but much more fuel efficient to operate, I think of the possibility of a package carrier picking up more business in lower demand markets being able to operate at capacity.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East of LGB
Age: 69
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had wondered about all of the B717's hitting the bone yard,
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Uganda
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What most people will not know, is that MD80, CAN load 96" pallets, along the aircraft , and you can transfer a standard wide body lower deck 96" pallet direct to the MD80 , you cannot do this with a B737! Might guzzle alot of fuel, but engines are half the price of the CFM on a 737, and the cost of buying the aircraft is also alot cheaper. You will find the aircraft being converted are mid 90's built aircraft, also younger than alot of the B737's. I think there could be a market for this aircraft?
MD 80 is a chapter II noise aircraft, while the 737 conforms to chapter III. I don't know about other regions but no way it would fly in Europe, especially not in the night hours.
Many airports demand at least chapter III compliance, some even limit it further (by means of a list of approved aircraft).
Many airports demand at least chapter III compliance, some even limit it further (by means of a list of approved aircraft).
I stand corrected, they managed to officially certify it chapter III.
But in some countries it is not accepted in the night hours, as it is considerably louder than most other Chapter III aircraft. Some don't even count it as Chapter III as it is one the very edge of satisfying the Chapter III noise limits. Strictly measured it doesn't.
Germany for example prohibits MD8X departures after 10 pm on most airports, as it is not in the "bonus list" (most other Chapter III aircraft are).
But in some countries it is not accepted in the night hours, as it is considerably louder than most other Chapter III aircraft. Some don't even count it as Chapter III as it is one the very edge of satisfying the Chapter III noise limits. Strictly measured it doesn't.
Germany for example prohibits MD8X departures after 10 pm on most airports, as it is not in the "bonus list" (most other Chapter III aircraft are).
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: near the beach
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crap plane !!! - I fly one now and I really enjoy it - did 721,752 and 762 + Biz Jets - Its great. They target 3 world countries so night or late departures out of European airports not a major concern - It is Stage 3 and with bolt on conversion hush kit, stage 4 - Cheers