Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

MD-80 Freighter

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

MD-80 Freighter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Mar 2013, 15:01
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: on the move
Age: 55
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How's the success of this aircraft been?
Flying Mechanic is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2013, 08:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 160
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stage II, not susceptible to FOD, cheap engines, built like a tank, low aquisition cost, low-tech hydraulics and electrics/computers.

Figure we'll see a lot of them in Africa!

Anil
Anilv is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2013, 10:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They've delivered one or two. Claiming to have orders for 20 but customers are not disclosed, apart from USA Jets and Everts (without specifying even a number of their respective orders). Looks a bit fishy
CargoOne is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2013, 06:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Wing ice is a pain in the *** crappy brakes, leaks in the rain, or when being deiced, enjoy the glycol in your lap. Weak ineffective air conditioning.


Sluggish and unresponsive in roll, way oversensitive in pitch, totally the opposite of what most Pilots like. Poor / non existent high altitude performance.


That's the bad, good, very simple and reliable, quiet cockpit.
stilton is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2013, 17:24
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

Man, I sure feel sorry for the pilots who fly for Everts Air Cargo.. Talk about a hard, underpaid situation to be in..
Phantomflight is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2013, 09:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: KGRB, but on the road about 1/2 the time.
Age: 61
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When i was flying DC-9 freighters in Africa, our "chief pilot" said that the MD-80 freighters (they are all the long-bodied aircraft, not MD-87 conversions) were better, overall, as freighters than the 737s. He thought they would do a fantastic job on the shorter routes (those requiring something smaller than a 757).

cliff
PVG
atpcliff is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2013, 21:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Or-E-Gun, USA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airframe Cost

The largest advantage (IMO) is the initial airframe cost. Even modest total hour/cycle frames are are easily had a garage sale prices and the Dog series was made with lots or real metal, so major mods in the conversion are minimal. As others have noted, fuel burn at near MTOW will be high, but package carriers are used to that. For a specialty carrier, perhaps on a fixed schedule with light loads and small containers, I can imagine a few of them. Two hundred MD-80F conversions seems like some salesman's wet dream. (And sadly, MD-80 drivers in need of work are cheap.)
No Fly Zone is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2013, 06:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: KGRB, but on the road about 1/2 the time.
Age: 61
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think there could be a big demand in developing areas: Africa, SE Asia, South America....especially places where it takes a LONG time to deliver stuff via ground, and air transport is the only viable solution.

Flying an MD freighter is WAY less expensive than flying a 757. It is also less expensive than a DC-9, as they can hold a lot more, fly further, and burn less fuel. I think that they hold more than the 737 freighters, and between the initial cost and the cost to pay pilots, I think the MD is the way to go.

cliff
ANC
atpcliff is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2013, 04:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mexican cargo carrier Aeronaves TSM is one of the customers of the type with 2 on order, one is currently undergoing conversion in Miami, it's expected to begin flying with the company next summer.
diego727 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2013, 21:02
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just a couple of points


leaking while deicing...well, you stuff paper towels in the DV window and no problem

you see, when you deice, the plane isn't pressurized and the windows do leak...but if you know what to do, it won't hurt you.

as to noise...we were the launch customer of the 737 with the CFM56 engines and it turned out that they were noiser than the MD80s we had...as we operated many segments out of Washington National we found we could land later with the MD80 than the 737...(washington has some very strict noise rules)

And anyone that has heard an MD90 takeoff, it stage 4! wow is it quiet.


This type will be a fine freighter and I am glad that they are being converted.
flarepilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.