Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

GSS to fly for Atlas in MIA, South America

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

GSS to fly for Atlas in MIA, South America

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jan 2012, 02:34
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
GSS was created after the UK's Department of Trade and Industry told BA that it would no longer accept it's pleas that there wasn't a European operation available to carry out it's BAWC work after continued pressure from the UK's Independent Pilot's Association. They either had to find one, or go back to flying freight themselves again. The IPA, a British union, had been complaining for a long time about BA's flagging out and disregard for the UK's laws, so when The DTI took enough interest, the result was inevitable. By creating GSS, AAWW held onto the contract. GSS is 49% owned by AAWW (the largest share a non UK company can hold) and essentially it is still Atlas, but operating under a UK AOC with all that entails including employing pilots who had the right to work in the EU.

I can imagine the response in the US if a very large airline there wanted to use an foreign ACMI operation to do a large part of it's work. Well - I think we have just seen the result - the GSS MIA operation has been cancelled. And I apologise if my use of the word "payback" offended - perhaps I could have found a less inflammatory term. And I'm not happy that some of the AACS crew got the sh!tty end of the stick - they just got caught up in a situation over which they had no control. Atlas don't have a great record of employee relations after MC tragically died - as demonstrated by the Polar situation.

Not that GSS have been great. Their Ts and Cs suck and the BA commands debacle was another shafting of the GSS crews.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2012, 02:52
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as demonstrated by the Polar situation.

Please explain what you mean by this. I can't wait to hear your answer!
Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2012, 10:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North of CDG
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to get the record straight, 49% is the maximum a non-EU company can hold (US in this case). According to Single Market rules, an EU-registered company can hold 100% of another if they so like.

Cheers
FougaMagister is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2012, 12:45
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't take the bait Fr8! What is past is past and who really gives a darn.
trashhauler is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2012, 20:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miami, FL U.S.A.
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't take the bait Fr8! What is past is past and who really gives a darn.
Agreed! AACS is history, and Atlas/Polar are now moving ahead.
Po Boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.