Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Asiana 747F missing?

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Asiana 747F missing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jul 2011, 10:56
  #21 (permalink)  

Cool as a moosp
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mostly Hong Kong
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DGR, AFP are reporting lithium batteries as part of the cargo. It is reported in the thread above.
moosp is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 11:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DGR , respectfully , when something in your safe , earth based office could go BOOM and kill you and your desk and chair I am sure you would want that item removed too. We don`t care how it`s packed , just get it off the damn aircraft.
6000PIC is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 11:09
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How are we certifying aircraft without fire suppression on the main decks of these aircraft! IALPA needs to start serious lobbying. As long as 'only' freighters are affected, nothing will change.
Once they go that's pretty much it, they require no external oxygen to burn and will resist just about all attempts to extinguish them.
Correct, so retrofitting the main deck with active fire extinguishing equipment will most probably not solve the problem for a runaway battery fire while at the same time the current fire suppression equipment works satisfactory for all other fires.

IF (!) an uncontrollable battery fire indeed was the cause of this accident, then IMHO perhaps the handling, storage, packaging and transporting of electronic devices with Lithium batteries should be reviewed, not the fire fighting/suppression equipment.
Tank2Engine is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 11:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Ap is reporting that the captian yelled fire. Is that enough evidence of a fire?

Official: Pilot on crashed South Korean cargo plane reported fire in final moments

By Associated Press, Published: July*27 | Updated: Thursday, July*28, 3:33*AM

SEOUL, South Korea — A pilot aboard an Asiana Airlines cargo plane that crashed Thursday in waters off a southern South Korean resort island reported a fire just before losing contact with air traffic workers, an official said.

The pilot yelled “Cargo fire!” and “Emergency!” about 10 minutes before the plane disappeared from radar screens, according to an air traffic official who declined to be named because the investigation was ongoing.


Official: Pilot on crashed South Korean cargo plane reported fire in final moments - The Washington Post
EX91 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 12:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: aboard
Age: 64
Posts: 81
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ditch

Sad news.

If it turns out to be a replay of the UPS6 crash, it means we have not learned from it - a lost opportunity.

A thought; if you have a true cargofire (not a false warning, but with real noticeable smoke), the airplane is a write off from that very moment. Even if you land it within minutes, it will almost certainly burn out.

So there's no need to save the plane, just it's occupants.

If there's not an airport in the immediate vicinity, put it on any flat piece of land or ditch it.

17 minutes is the average survivable time with a cargo or cabin fire. Anything over that and you're on borrowed time.

Last edited by Mariner; 28th Jul 2011 at 12:43.
Mariner is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 12:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Age: 68
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Put it on a flat piece of land or ditch it."

Have to agree with Mariner. Ditch it as quickly as possible. In fact, since the Hudson river splash, ditching (both time available and minimum time available) has been included in our cyclical sim program.

Maggot
maggot738 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:09
  #27 (permalink)  
GBV
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hyatt, Regal, Novotel and so on
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, ditching could be an option, but don't forget that land on a river during daylight with nice weather is one thing, ditching a B747 into Pacific on the dark and with smoke in the cockpit is completely different, little chance of surviving...
GBV is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:10
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have 15-17 minutes

After having read the available albeit limited information so far,

the following relies on memory so those of you with charts may have more accurate distances.

1. They were in contact with Shanghai Control when the fire was detected.

2. This means they were past FIR Boundary waypoint LAMEN. LAMEN is 150 nm from ZSPD ( Shanghai - Pudong )

3. Even if they were exactly at LAMEN they were 210 nm ( via airways) to RKPC (Jeju)

4. Therefore it seems they did not divert to the nearest airport - no idea of WX/ NOTAMS at the relevant airports.

5. They reported control problems at 7600' i.e. Less than 5 mins to landing in an emergency. I haven't flown the B744 in years but I remember some control cables run along the roof of the cargo compartment.

6. I acknowledge that emergency diversions into mainland China are not an attractive proposition and that Jeju was an online and probably maintenance base for OZ but IF(!) the above assumptions are true then once again all these cargo fire incidents say that you must have the airplane on the ground or water in 15-17 mins..

7. Not trying to to be a Monday morning quarter back and second guess the Captain as I wasn't there. Condolences to the families
Master Caution is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:11
  #29 (permalink)  
711
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Up in the air
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sully was very very lucky, I reckon the odds of surviving ditching at night on open water are pretty slim actually.. I say ban Lithium now and wait for the investigation.
711 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:11
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My Suitcase
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had a chat with a few colleagues. Ditching an aircraft in the middle of the Atlantic or the Pacific is almost a death sentence. If you even survive the ditching, you will now face the prospect of drowning or freezing or starving in the middle of the huge ocean.

We threw around some ideas and one of the ideas was to stay up high, depressurize the aircraft (if main deck fire, as per the checklist), and PRAY that the fire will go out from lack of oxygen. Like I said, in the middle of the ocean, you must be very lucky to have an airfield within 17 minutes. Even then, Asiana lost contact within 11 minutes.
overmars is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Starving???
Spitty42 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:15
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A thought; if you have a true cargofire (not a false warning, but with real noticeable smoke), the airplane is a write off from that very moment. Even if you land it within minutes, it will almost certainly burn out.

So there's no need to save the plane, just it's occupants.

If there's not an airport in the immediate vicinity, put it on any flat piece of land or ditch it.
17 minutes is the average survivable time with a cargo or cabin fire. Anything over that and you're on borrowed time.
I tend to agree if you're dealing with an uncontrollable (battery related?) fire, but how do you know whether you're dealing with a 'normal' fire or an uncontrollable battery fire when a fire warning sounds?

Investigating the cause of the fire (uncontrollable battery fire or not), decision making, finding suitable terrain/water and subsequent ditching from a normal 744 cruising level within 17 minutes would be totally unrealistic IMHO.
Tank2Engine is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:16
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My Suitcase
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well yeah, I am gonna grab that bottle of mineral water before jumping off!
overmars is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 13:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if the presence of a suitably trained loadmaster would make any difference to a main deck lithium fire - if he got to it quick enough.

Thoughts?
Fr8t M8te is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 14:25
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it was lithium batteries then they must go the same way as chemical oxygen generators.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 14:37
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: KUL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Put your old laptop- or mobile battery on a BBQ and see what happens. It's a hellfire - better than magnesium.
MrMachfivepointfive is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 14:39
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,069
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Check this FAA-Demo please:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcd34tt8YPU
Less Hair is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 14:45
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They reported control problems at 7600' i.e. Less than 5 mins to landing in an emergency

I know that's what the airline said, but I wonder if they meant 7,600m given that it's Chinese airspace. Doesn't make sense to be down at 7,600ft halfway to Shanghai.
I'm guessing they were 7600' on decent during their emergency diversion to Jeju. Perhaps if they had kept going to Shanghai they would have already been on the ground if the assumptions in my previous post were correct.
Master Caution is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 14:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,069
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Sounds like the UPS. As you descend into thicker air the fire turns violent.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2011, 15:17
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
overmars....

Had a chat with a few colleagues. Ditching an aircraft in the middle of the Atlantic or the Pacific is almost a death sentence. If you even survive the ditching, you will now face the prospect of drowning or freezing or starving in the middle of the huge ocean. We threw around some ideas and one of the ideas was to stay up high, depressurize the aircraft (if main deck fire, as per the checklist), and PRAY that the fire will go out from lack of oxygen.
There were no "death sentences" for any of the USAir A320 occupants who had ditched in the Hudson river. Some people didn't even get their feet wet.

The B747s that I'm flying are equipped with life rafts. With today's GPS position accuracy, rescue services would find your ELT equipped, bobbing life raft before you'd "starve to death."

During an over ocean uncontrolled fire I will not pray; I will make a controlled ditching after 15min emergency descent while I can still read some instruments ...BEFORE being completely smoked out and subject to an uncontrolled crash.
GlueBall is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.