Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

common rating - 737-200 and 757-200

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

common rating - 737-200 and 757-200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Apr 2010, 16:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chennai,India
Age: 69
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
common rating - 737-200 and 757-200

Hi,
Can any body tell me whether any country's regulator permits crew to have common rating to fly the 737-200 and the 757-200 in cargo role simultaneously ?
cargocaptain is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2010, 17:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None. The US has a common rating for 757 and 767, but not 737 and 757.
Intruder is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2010, 19:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Common rating for 732 and 752 - not even in Dark Africa. However nothing prevents you from having two ratings endorsed and current.
CargoOne is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 01:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FAA doesn't like it for Part 121 ops. They require extra Proficiency checks...
Intruder is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 07:43
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chennai,India
Age: 69
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737-200 and 757-200 common rating

Thanks Intruder and Cargo One! That is exactly what I thought too! But how does one convince an aviation illiterate higher management?!! Can you guys give me any lead to regulationary provisions on the subject. Appreciate your inputs.
cargocaptain is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 08:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FAA doesn't like it for Part 121 ops. They require extra Proficiency checks...
True now, however, in the past I personally knew two guys who held three types on license, current and line qualified.
They both were at TWA, and were triple line qualified...B747, B767, L1011.
Concurrently.
Extra sim checks?
Yes.
However these folks were very switched on, and enjoyed the challange.

Both Captains had their favorite, of course.
It was....?

TriStar.

No surprise, either. It simply is a better designed airplane.
411A is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 10:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cargocaptain,

Here is JAA type rating list http://easa.europa.eu/ws_prod/c/doc/...ement_list.pdf

You can see there what types require separate rating and what can be under a common rating with differences courses.

I'm not qualified to comment on FAA land, but EASA/JAA land having 2 current type ratings are not rare, however airlines are usually asked by authorities to specify some conditions in ops manual in this regard.
CargoOne is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 13:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to fly B737-200's and B707-320C in the late 70's on alternate days sometimes and later on B757/767 which were of course almost the same . Just had to remember which one had the step down into the cockpit.

Whilst on the B767 I kept my B737 rating current as a backup and the day after having been in the B737 simulator I got airborne in a B767 and had a momentary cause for concern when I trimmed manually and heard nothing whereas on the B737 the trim wheel clattered when it moved compared to silence on the B767.
millerscourt is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 16:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
When I worked on the other side of the Pond in the 1980's, most of the DC-8 guys were dual-qualified on the B707. They turned up for work and flew whichever one was given them.

The CP and FOD were quadruple-qualified (707, 727, DC-8 and DC-10). The pair of them spent half their lives staying current in the various sims!
JW411 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 04:24
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chennai,India
Age: 69
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737-200 and 757-200 common rating

Thank You all for the inputs. Those where good old days when the big jets had conventional flight decks. One happily flew with basic skills. Automation has made the difference today and hence the regulators in my part of the world doesnt want a Pilot jumping from an automated flight deck to conventional one, may be relevant for low time folks building up experience.
cargocaptain is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 13:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: on the edge
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow?

I find it hard to believe that any company (even Arrow in Miami) would be able to allow crewmembers to be current and qualified on 4 different types. Perhaps they went to the sim, but if they flew 4 different types on a regular basis, I can't imagine that being in the ops manual as being legal. 2 different types; yes, 4 different types; jail time (even in MIA in the 80's).
slowto280 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 18:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
type ratings and JAR FCL

JAR FCL 1.235: there is no limit on the number of ratings that can be held at any one time, but there may be limits on the number of ratings that can be exercised at any one time.
IweinVanCaelenberg is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.