C130/L100 maint changes
Thread Starter
C130/L100 maint changes
Got an email from a mate that suggests that there are some serious changes coming amongst others, wing box inspections for these ships.
Anyone heard anything similar?
Anyone heard anything similar?
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: on the edge
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Delta Airlines....
As you can see from the link below, Delta Airlines was the first operator of the L-100 (civilian C-130). I believe Delta was the only carrier to call it the L-100, others used/have used L-382. Most, if not all, civilian models did not have the floor level, lower windows in the cockpit. SAT flew many different 'missions' with them.....
Delta Air Lines Blog
Delta Air Lines Blog
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pago Pago
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was never called the L100 by Lockheed who built the thing. It was known as the L382 (which is what my type rating says). The L100 is the dual rail system installed in the aircraft. The story I hear is that when Lockheed was demo-ing the thing to the USAF the captions on the bottom of the story boards depicting the aircraft and the dual rail locks were reversed and some folks have called it the L100 since then. The civilian version of the C130 is called the L382 by its manufacturer and by the FAA. Doesn't really matter what the "Delta Blogger" says. All models of the Hercules flown by Southern Air were the L382.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: on the edge
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Beav....
Relax, yes it is an L-382, although Delta choose to call it the L-100, for whatever reason. It appears they were the first civil operator, which in my opinion gives them the right to call it anything they like. And yes, as I stated, "S(outhern) A(ir) T(RANSPORT!!) flew many different 'missions' with them"...., of which I flew 'several'.... Merely passing on information as to why, I believe, someone would use the term 'L-100'. It would appear then when folks refer to, as an example, 747-400's as 744's they should be considered idiots. Unfortunately, it also appears that not all posters here are as 'informed' as you are. Thanks for the info.... 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Green Heart of Europe!
Age: 65
Posts: 235
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the COMMERCIAL world, the OFFICIAL designation of L-382 was also widely known as the L-100.
L-382E was also known as the L-100-20, the L-382G known as the L-100-30.
You will see these designations applied to many operators worldwide, both millitary and civil.
Ah, bless Pprune for pedants!
L-382E was also known as the L-100-20, the L-382G known as the L-100-30.
You will see these designations applied to many operators worldwide, both millitary and civil.
Ah, bless Pprune for pedants!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
382 is the engineering model number for the C-130.
L-100-20/-30 were the commercial sales model numbers for cilivian C-130's.
193 is the enginering model number for the TriStar.
L-1011 is the commercial sales model number for the TriStar.
L-100-20/-30 were the commercial sales model numbers for cilivian C-130's.
193 is the enginering model number for the TriStar.
L-1011 is the commercial sales model number for the TriStar.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would appear then when folks refer to, as an example, 747-400's as 744's they should be considered idiots.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got an email from a mate that suggests that there are some serious changes coming amongst others, wing box inspections for these ships.
Anyone heard anything similar?
Anyone heard anything similar?
It was never called the L100 by Lockheed who built the thing.
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/a...ines/v29n1.pdf
Last edited by glhcarl; 4th Jun 2009 at 18:16.
