Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Strange MD-10 incident

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Strange MD-10 incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd July 2008 | 16:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
"The INTRODUCER"
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: London
Strange MD-10 incident

Anyone shed any light on this:

NTSB Identification: DCA08FA075
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP (D.B.A. Federal Express Corp)
Accident occurred Saturday, June 14, 2008 in New York, NY
Aircraft: Douglas MD-10-10, registration: N554FE
Injuries: 3 Uninjured.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.

On June 14, 2008, at 1015 eastern daylight time, FedEx flight 764, a McDonnell Douglas/Boeing MD-10-10 freighter, experienced stickshaker and autoslat extension while in a holding pattern. Damage occurred to the right elevator and right horizontal stabilizer. The flight was enroute from Memphis, Tennessee, to New York City. None of the three flightcrew members onboard were injured and the flight landed uneventfully. The aircraft was substantially damaged.
Algy is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd July 2008 | 16:33
  #2 (permalink)  
Longtimelurker
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: killington Vt
How about they stalled while in a holding pattern.
filejw is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd July 2008 | 21:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
"The INTRODUCER"
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: London
You know that, or you're guessing?
Algy is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2008 | 00:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: USA
I'm guessing the same thing... similarity in damage to Aeromexico 945, stalled over Luxembourg 11 November 1979 due to autopilot mismanagement.
Hold West is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2008 | 02:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
MD-10, aren't those the DC-10s modified to remove the Flight Engineer position?

So..in this case the third person would have been an SO, sort of like a living...breathing nav radio automatic channel-changer!! (and coffee maker).

You know what I'm getting at don't you....they have just paid all this cash to get rid of the most valuable monitoring member of the crew!!!

Well...you asked for it!

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd August 2008 | 11:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Nairobi
FD - could'nt agree more. Nothing quite like three pairs of eyes
Coleman Myers is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd August 2008 | 12:27
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: UK
I don't think the damage was very substantial as the aircraft appears to have been returned to service quite quickly.
GAZIN is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd August 2008 | 13:04
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
I'm with Hold West. I recall the Aeromexico event, and wish to point out a third set of eyeballs didn't help them, eh?

Postscript: I also recall that one airline (possibly Aeromexico?) was chastized for removing the fins/strakes on #1 and #3 nacelles - ostensibly to prevent techs from parking their hand tools there. These strakes have a significant effect on stall characteristics. Somehow I doubt that removal of strakes is the case with FedEx, though.

Last edited by barit1; 3rd August 2008 at 14:00.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th August 2008 | 03:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: USA
For those speculating about how a "third set of eyes" would have helped, did you miss the part in the post about none of the THREE crew members on board were injured? Who's to say that this flight was not continuing on to a farther destination and did in fact have that THIRD set of eyes in the form of an RFO?
DOJETDRIVER is offline  
Reply
Old 6th August 2008 | 20:04
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
From: Mud Island
20 years ago Alitalia reported damage to tailplane after an inadvertent stall during climbout (which manufacturer kept quiet) so this would appear to be nothing new?
offa is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2008 | 02:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Fedex has a horrible history with incidents and accidents over the last few years. Why the FAA hasnt hasnt investigated their training and procedures is beyond me(or maybe they have). After this incident I guess they are good to go( for the next few months anyway).
whaledriver101 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.