Strange MD-10 incident
"The INTRODUCER"
Thread Starter
Strange MD-10 incident
Anyone shed any light on this:
NTSB Identification: DCA08FA075
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP (D.B.A. Federal Express Corp)
Accident occurred Saturday, June 14, 2008 in New York, NY
Aircraft: Douglas MD-10-10, registration: N554FE
Injuries: 3 Uninjured.
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.
On June 14, 2008, at 1015 eastern daylight time, FedEx flight 764, a McDonnell Douglas/Boeing MD-10-10 freighter, experienced stickshaker and autoslat extension while in a holding pattern. Damage occurred to the right elevator and right horizontal stabilizer. The flight was enroute from Memphis, Tennessee, to New York City. None of the three flightcrew members onboard were injured and the flight landed uneventfully. The aircraft was substantially damaged.
NTSB Identification: DCA08FA075
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP (D.B.A. Federal Express Corp)
Accident occurred Saturday, June 14, 2008 in New York, NY
Aircraft: Douglas MD-10-10, registration: N554FE
Injuries: 3 Uninjured.
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.
On June 14, 2008, at 1015 eastern daylight time, FedEx flight 764, a McDonnell Douglas/Boeing MD-10-10 freighter, experienced stickshaker and autoslat extension while in a holding pattern. Damage occurred to the right elevator and right horizontal stabilizer. The flight was enroute from Memphis, Tennessee, to New York City. None of the three flightcrew members onboard were injured and the flight landed uneventfully. The aircraft was substantially damaged.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Age: 67
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm guessing the same thing... similarity in damage to Aeromexico 945, stalled over Luxembourg 11 November 1979 due to autopilot mismanagement.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MD-10, aren't those the DC-10s modified to remove the Flight Engineer position?
So..in this case the third person would have been an SO, sort of like a living...breathing nav radio automatic channel-changer!! (and coffee maker).
You know what I'm getting at don't you....they have just paid all this cash to get rid of the most valuable monitoring member of the crew!!!
Well...you asked for it!
Cheers...FD...
So..in this case the third person would have been an SO, sort of like a living...breathing nav radio automatic channel-changer!! (and coffee maker).
You know what I'm getting at don't you....they have just paid all this cash to get rid of the most valuable monitoring member of the crew!!!
Well...you asked for it!
Cheers...FD...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm with Hold West. I recall the Aeromexico event, and wish to point out a third set of eyeballs didn't help them, eh? 
Postscript: I also recall that one airline (possibly Aeromexico?) was chastized for removing the fins/strakes on #1 and #3 nacelles - ostensibly to prevent techs from parking their hand tools there. These strakes have a significant effect on stall characteristics. Somehow I doubt that removal of strakes is the case with FedEx, though.
Postscript: I also recall that one airline (possibly Aeromexico?) was chastized for removing the fins/strakes on #1 and #3 nacelles - ostensibly to prevent techs from parking their hand tools there. These strakes have a significant effect on stall characteristics. Somehow I doubt that removal of strakes is the case with FedEx, though.
Last edited by barit1; 3rd Aug 2008 at 14:00.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For those speculating about how a "third set of eyes" would have helped, did you miss the part in the post about none of the THREE crew members on board were injured? Who's to say that this flight was not continuing on to a farther destination and did in fact have that THIRD set of eyes in the form of an RFO?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: atlanta
Age: 58
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fedex has a horrible history with incidents and accidents over the last few years. Why the FAA hasnt hasnt investigated their training and procedures is beyond me(or maybe they have). After this incident I guess they are good to go( for the next few months anyway).
