Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Old B74F aircraft and their operations

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Old B74F aircraft and their operations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jun 2008, 20:56
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: tracy island
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where are TFAAA and TFAAB.. ?? customer is waiting for their arrival
acmi48 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 22:12
  #42 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 1 Post
I sometimes wondered where some of those ex-Kuwaiti 747-269's went, I used to fly 'em in Kuwait Airways, left there in DEC94.
Flew 'em too, left the sandbox in January 94.

Spent a total of 15 years on the classics for various operators, good old birds...RIP now that oil is $140.00 per barrel.
TowerDog is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 08:39
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MAN/Wherever
Age: 62
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TFAAA due into Lux Tuesday, AAB in August.
superspotter is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 14:23
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many of those aircrafts are flying stuff for the war in Irak. If you remove that "economic" sector, the demand for heavy transport would fall and many operators (who are now making buckets of money from that) would go under.
Iraq. No...much of the cargo being moved is mail and other requiremements that are subcontracted out. Operators such as Kalitta would scarcely go under if the military contracts went away. You might be surprised how much demand and use there is for ACMI flying by others than the military. The Civil Reserve Aircraft Fleet utilizes not only ACMI carriers, but carriers who have passenger and freight operations who are prepared and required to place a substantial amout of their fleet to government use should the need arise. This is known as a force multiplier.

Some, if not all USA cargo operations fly supplies to Iraq... and Afghanistan...
Big money, Air Force fuel...
They offload in Bagdad, Kuwait, in Kabul...
xxx
Thereafter, funny things happen...
They max their fuel tanks (free Air Force fuel again)
"for a empty trip back to the US of A..."
It's not free fuel, and in most cases the operator obtains the fuel. Where fuel is provided, it's factored into the cost of the operation, and is hardly "free."

I'm in Hong Kong at the moment, where we ferried empty after a location in the middle east, definitely not on military fuel. We have goods to carry from here headed eastbound as part of the regular trip around the globe. The military didn't pay to put us here, nor is this flight military. We'd be here regardless of the military contracts, and without the benifit of military fuel, just as we are at this moment.

You guys run empty to HKG and still make money with payload one-way only?
That is impressive -
The airplane has made money all the way around, and will keep making it all the way home, too. The airplanes pay for us, pay for themselves, pay the company, and earn a profit.

How about noise in them old -100s ?
How about them? They're still earning a living. The -100's are weight restricted to meet noise issues in some locations, and operated accordingly. Additionally, flaps at 25 max is often used with weights adjusted accordingly, where necessary. Not a problem.

747-271F for sale, JT9D-70A motors...
Outstanding engines... (provided you NEVER ever deploy reversers).
One reverser cycle = aircraft AOG for next 30 days.
We have -7A engines on some airplanes, and use the reversers every landing, of course. Then quick turn and go again. They work. An occasional flame-out or other problem, yes. But they work.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 04:35
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He was talking about -70 PW engines not -7A. Poople had alot of trouble with the -70 engine. I think pratt made it to compete with the GE CF6 engine.
sidman is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 05:42
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: tracy island
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
200f acmi operators are looking VERY closely at the figures now-the potential profit margins are next to nothing- look for hourly rates of 4000 usd p/blk hr soon to find customers
acmi48 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 07:05
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=330486
Kitsune is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 08:18
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ex Kuwaiti -200's are sitting in RUH as of 2 days ago.
Atlanta-Driver is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.