Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

NEW Heavy operator ?


Notices
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

NEW Heavy operator ?

Old 22nd August 2006 | 11:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: In from the fringe
NEW Heavy operator ?

Greetings ,

Any information about a mob I spotted b747c ...Finoval /Sky express . Machine was parked in Athens Greece......Never heard of them .

Salutations,
jones
spierpoint jones is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2006 | 13:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Heathrow
it rang a slight bell I stumbled over their web site the other day
the cargo schedule <link below> is conspicuous by the fact there are no flights shown

http://www.skyexpress.gr/cargo/schedule.asp
42ongo is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2006 | 20:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: USA
Looks like the good ole N921FT
Heilhaavir is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2006 | 20:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: UTAH USA
N921FT?..........They are doomed................
B74flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2006 | 21:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: USA
No kidding
Heilhaavir is offline  
Reply
Old 28th November 2007 | 20:29
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Gone from the FL sun to the desert Oasis
IS Sky Express still operating?

What is the story with this airline? Their B74F SX-FIN is reported
stored at Chatoreux. Are they still operational??? Where did they
operate too??
Sleeping Freight Dog is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2007 | 02:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: KLAX
If SX-FIN is indeed ole' 921 in disguise (as it appears to be), it probably only operated to / from the maintenance shed. . . . Poor Finoval.

Last edited by L-38; 29th November 2007 at 03:00.
L-38 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2007 | 08:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Gatwick
Sky Express

Sky Express started up Summer 2006 and stopped Summer 2007. Not much flying during that time. Commercially they had little idea as to what to do with it. Alot of SAW - ALA & FRU baggage runs and not much else from what I can gather. Indeed the old Polar machine and everyone raised there eyes when they announced it. It did spend most of its life in the shed fixing whatever was wrong with it next.

I always find it amazing that the money is available and then P****d down the drawn almost immediatley.
Need to Know Basis is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2007 | 16:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: KLAX
"I always find it amazing that the money is available and then P****d down the drawn almost immediatley."

Thanks for the info. I was curious as to what had happened when 921 was sold and sent to ATH back around March of 06. . . . . . 921 - sole fleet aircraft then fully owned by Polar (not leased), is probably the last remaining -70a powered machine, a one of a kind derivative (note - 70a not 7a).

Poor consulting / ignorant decisions gave investors little for their money. This happens far to often in aviation.
L-38 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2007 | 15:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: NM
Heard those thrust reverses were always screwing up on those -70a. Weren't they ordered by Seaborn once upon a time?
fuegolibre is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2007 | 22:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: KLAX
I had thought that they were only ordered by Flying Tigers. . . . Was once told that one of the parts for the -70a's t/r could now only be hand made by a unique machinist who resided in London.
L-38 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2007 | 03:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: NM
I'm reaching back, but I thought they were ordered by Seaborn acquired by Flying Tigers, passed onto FedEx which they worked for a short while then sat pickled for some time. After that I lost them kind of. I think Atlas got three of them or something like that and got rid of them after a short time.
fuegolibre is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2007 | 11:45
  #13 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Close to FACT
Didn't AFX have two of them? G-GAFX & G-INTL. Both 70a powered.
CR2 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2007 | 14:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: NM
Now that you mention it, I think your right. Just don't remember where in the chain.
fuegolibre is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2007 | 15:45
  #15 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Close to FACT
Found this...

30/04/1976 Seaboard World N702SW
01/09/1980 Flying Tigers N812FT
07/08/1989 Federal Express N641FE
05/09/1996 Atlas Air N641FE
01/05/1998 Federal Express N641FE
15/05/1999 Airfreight Express VP-BXP
10/08/1999 Airfreight Express N641FE
28/08/1999 Airfreight Express G-GAFX Stored at Manston 02/2003 as N218BA
CR2 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2007 | 16:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Florida
There were only two things wrong with the thrust reversers; couldn't get 'em in, couldn't get 'em out. But, hey that was alright, the autobrakes only worked in max!
trashhauler is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2007 | 19:52
  #17 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Close to FACT
Leaked too, just had to follow the cigarette smoke to the door seals
CR2 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th December 2007 | 06:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: NM
I was on one of the Evergreen Gatex door 747's once. One on a temporary exemption for the door. Got bored and went down to check the cargo. I saw so much daylight coming through the door frame I decided not to do that again.

Now that was a bad seal and door. Luckily we rarely went above 310.

Eventually, the FAA resolved that problem.

Last edited by fuegolibre; 8th December 2007 at 23:02.
fuegolibre is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.