Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Boeing launches the 747-8

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Boeing launches the 747-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th November 2005 | 08:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Boeing launches the 747-8

Boeing has it on their website now.
They officialy launched the next generation 747. Launching customers are both cargo operators, namely Nippon Cargo and Cargolux Airlines.
First delivery scheduled to Cargolux 3rd quarter 2009, Nippon Cargo 4th quarter 2009.
GreekPilot747 is offline  
Old 15th November 2005 | 10:24
  #2 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,470
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
The 747-8 Freighter will be 5.6 m (18.3 ft) longer than the 747-400 freighter. With a total payload capacity of 140 metric tonnes (154 tons), including tare weight, the 747-8F provides 16 percent more cargo revenue volume than the -400. The additional 117m³ (4,124 ft³) from the longer fuselage offers space for four additional main-deck pallets, two additional lower-hold pallets and two additional lower-hold containers.

Strewth! Better dust off those tipping charts Ratty!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 15th November 2005 | 10:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Greece
The cargo version is going to have fuselage extensions, both fore and aft of the wing, so it might not be too critical in that respect.
However let the loadmasters speak.
GreekPilot747 is offline  
Old 15th November 2005 | 10:56
  #4 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,470
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
If the aft extension is forward of the rear door...?...that's going to cause some angst on the ramp! A forward extension won't offset that.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 16th November 2005 | 00:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
I'm sure that between now and 2009 the loading details will be satisfactorily addressed, in fact, on pure freighters there could be a side cargo door forward of the wing.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 16th November 2005 | 01:14
  #6 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,470
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
No, no no! You're missing the point GlueBall! This is what a Rumour network is all about...it's our duty to worry about what professionals paid to design such things are doing.

It's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 18th November 2005 | 06:00
  #7 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Close to FACT
Hi Buster,
The forward plug is bigger than the aft one from what I've seen. CG should not be an issue.
PS, I got your email ref chocolate, will send them down to our MEL office next week.
CR2 is offline  
Old 18th November 2005 | 09:06
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Airborne CG may not be an issue, but [un]loading those last/first few pallets could be a bear!
Intruder is offline  
Old 18th November 2005 | 21:19
  #9 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,470
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
You're a legend Ratty! Same arrangements as last time? Let me know!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 20th November 2005 | 01:09
  #10 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Close to FACT
Intruder: see previous post wrt CG.

Buster: Nurriers. couple of 6packs of XXXX and call it quits? Email you end next week.

No thread creep

We ordered the -ADV. We're happy. Ops peeps, Pilot peeps, anyone who is CLX peeps. (Accountants don't count).
Airbus tried very hard to stuff a package aircraft down our throats. We told them 6-7 years ago what they would have to do in order to persuade us that the then 3XX would be much better than a 74F. They knew better and wouldn't listen.

CR2 to snr VP Airbus: Can you build the 380 with an NCD?
VP Airbus to CR2: Yes, but you don't need it. So we won't.

Oh really.... Must be our fault that we haven't a clue what we need/want. Green behind the ears wannabe -F builder knows better.




Last edited by CR2; 20th November 2005 at 01:22.
CR2 is offline  
Old 21st November 2005 | 15:24
  #11 (permalink)  

Still Trampin' the Ramp
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Right in the middle of UK
Ratty,

Don'tya just love those Airbus guys. I remember some of the conversations when we were getting the -B4s and others when they were trying to sell us the 320/321 series as freighters. The 'we know better what you want than you do' attitude.

Me (talking 321) 'We want the cargo door back a bit so we can counter balance in Posn. 1 on the ground'

Them 'We see no reason for that'

Me 'Oh really? What was the last cargo aircraft you loaded?'

Them 'Er' SIlence 'But nobody has complained about the A300'

At that point I gave up!

RT
RampTramp is offline  
Old 21st November 2005 | 17:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: SEA (or better PAE)
Hello all.


Apparently it seems Airbus has a strange approach to freighters, apart from A300s . As long as they're stubborn with their approach the field will be fully open for Boeing (and Antonov up to the point).

I would assume they could try to do some conversions but fat chance, I guess.

I saw that stubbornness with the NCD on few other occasions when competent engineers form potential subcontractors and from some airlines/freighters suggested some stuff, in prelim phase of A380 development.

Outcome was more then cold and negative. Bad for them from what we can see now. They miss the whole market, still, for puzzling reasons, at least to me.

Boeing does step on its toes, a little bit, with 400F and 400 BCF and 747-8F at the same time but it is a big offer so, at the end, it's better for the customer, right?

Anyway, as I said before let's wait for a 747-8 PDR and see how are things progressing.

Cheers
Grunf is offline  
Old 26th November 2005 | 05:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Earth, or thereabouts
Let's see, Boeing Contract, 747-8 ordered...

It must suck to be at Cargolux.
MetAl is offline  
Old 4th December 2005 | 15:33
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Luxembourg
"It must suck to be at Cargolux"

Let's see, MetAl you must be a desk driving wannabee......
luxfreight is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.