Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

How's the 747F upper deck configuration?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

How's the 747F upper deck configuration?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th October 2005 | 06:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
Have been on an upper deck converted 742 freighter that had two (2) working lavs.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 29th October 2005 | 11:59
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL.
If you order yout 400F new, you have the option of a Starbucks in the hump.
Flyrr100 is offline  
Old 29th October 2005 | 12:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
...and gyro stabilized beds.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 5th November 2005 | 22:14
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: McKinney, TX
CargoMatatu is wrong. there are only 4 seats on the aft upper deck of Atlas Air -400F's. There are 2 bunks as well. We are limited on ALL freighters to 8 persons on board because thaere are only 8 eacape reels.
gti5ypfe is offline  
Old 6th November 2005 | 07:16
  #25 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: The Green Heart of Europe!
gti5ypfe

Read my follow-up post which was written AFTER a had my coffee!

May the Matatu be with you!

Matatu Man
CargoMatatu is offline  
Old 6th November 2005 | 07:29
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Earth, or thereabouts
Hee hee,

This is fun, what is standard?

I've flown 75+ different 747 airframes as freighters, and really, no two are the same.

Best visually were the old PanAm birds with the Juan Trippe artwork on the back wall.

Worst were the converted U-boats.

Best over all were the -400s built for the job.

And even line number 3, still flying at Evergreen, was a joy to fly. Didn't matter that it had done the hard landing test flight series.
MetAl is offline  
Old 9th November 2005 | 21:44
  #27 (permalink)  
None but a blockhead
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
And talking of Trippe and the 747...

"By pure chance, it was Trippe himself who gave the jumbo its signature bulge. In a rare lapse of vision, Trippe thought the 747 would be superseded by a big supersonic jet, as cheap to run as a subsonic jet. Some hope.

He therefore decreed that on the 747, pilots should sit above the flight deck so the nose could be opened up and take cargo. The 747's ultimate fate, he thought, would be as a flying Mack truck. Boeing showed him a wooden mock-up of the 747's flight deck, in the hump above the nose. He foraged around and came upon the space behind the flight deck, the rest of the hump. "What is this for?" he asked. "A crew rest area," said a Boeing engineer. "Rest area?" barked Trippe. "This is going to be reserved for passengers." "

http://www.time.com/time/time100/bui...le/trippe.html

(check the byline- though it probably wasn't really)

R
Self Loading Freight is offline  
Old 10th November 2005 | 05:52
  #28 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,470
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Well, there you go. I think it was QF that pushed for the extra windows in the UD that came out on the 742.
Buster Hyman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.