JAL Cargo goes bare metal
Thread Starter

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: Kot Addu
JAL Cargo goes bare metal
JL have finally decided to stop painting their freighters and will sport the American Airlines and defunct Flying Tigers shiny metal look, their two new 744F, of which one has been delievered are in the "new" scheme which JAL had been evaluating on a 742F since nearly a decade, JL have also become the third airline to convert some of their passenger 744's into Special Freighters, three of the aircraft will be converted starting Dec '05, they will also be wearing the bare metal scheme.

Joined: May 2003
Aviation Qualifications: Aircrew (non-pilot)
Posts: 282
Likes: 1
From: Ireland
Paint v Polish
There's a bit more to it than that, a paint job uses over half a ton of usable payload, but a polished aircraft costs more to maintain, but is easier to inspect.
Detailed explanation on http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aer...y/fo01txt.html
Detailed explanation on http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aer...y/fo01txt.html
Thread Starter

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: Kot Addu
Here's the 744SF, they will also be configured to carry 19 people ,a first for a freighter, why?
http://www.theedgedaily.com/cms/stor...JAL_inside.jpg
http://www.theedgedaily.com/cms/stor...JAL_inside.jpg
Last edited by newscaster; 18th October 2004 at 15:17.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: California US
We flew some ex-Tigers (-200F's) planes that had at least 12 pax seats on the upper deck... good for couriers, grooms, co. people etc. Very comfy...!
I parked next to a JAL -400F in Narita last week...it looked stunning...
TT
I parked next to a JAL -400F in Narita last week...it looked stunning...
TT
Evertonian


Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,471
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
newscaster. 19 would be roughly, a full 747 tech & cabin crew load. Pax em on a freighter & they release revenue seats back to the punters. They can also serve themselves!
However, they would need to "extend" the upper deck cabin from what I believe the original intention was for the 744SF. I guess JAL Cargo would be real happy to lose the "valuable" Q7 positions!
However, they would need to "extend" the upper deck cabin from what I believe the original intention was for the 744SF. I guess JAL Cargo would be real happy to lose the "valuable" Q7 positions!




