PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Fragrant Harbour (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour-19/)
-   -   SLS Payback (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour/408426-sls-payback.html)

snoopy99 10th March 2010 14:47

SLS Payback
 
What an insult that Captains will be returned only 90 % of their SLS while all others receive 100 %. What in the hell good will that 10 % do the company that makes it so worth the slap in the face? It is not about the money, but the poor message it sends.

Chief Pilots should be embarrassed to look their captains in the eye. We all know they are getting 90 % plus big bonus for the sales job they did.

Just another kick in the balls.

cxshareholder 11th March 2010 02:42

All I can say is for the rebellious types in CX, it should have been 52 weeks SLS and 0% repayment.

Here's to my 10 cents a share, maybe using the above method we can squeeze it up to 20 cents - cheers Tony! :ok:

deepdiggings 11th March 2010 03:24

Totally agree. You captains gave them four weeks as requested. I'd be banging down the DFO's door over that one or they will have big problems getting captains to sign up next time, and there will be a next time!

water check 11th March 2010 03:30

...yes, this is difficult to see it as anything other than a petty swipe at the Captains. I would love to hear a RATIONAL explanation as to why they only deserved 90%. Seems utterly small minded and lacking in class.

boocs 11th March 2010 03:41

A very good point water check. Why 90%? Who came up with that figure and why? Why not 95%, 99%, or wait for it... why not 100%?

I will be more than happy to participate in any future SLS/ULV scheme offered by The Cathay Pacific Group......................upon full repayment of 2009 SLS.

b.

laterla 11th March 2010 04:14

90% payback
 
Job LevelAmount of PaymentLevel A100% of the “Relevant Amount”Level B100% of the “Relevant Amount”Level C100% of the “Relevant Amount”Level D & above90% of the “Relevant Amount”

This affects lvl D and above not just captains

FO4EVA 11th March 2010 04:22

Yes, I really feel sorry for you captains.
Earning half a billion dollars a year, getting 28 extra days off and only being charged 2.8 days salary for it. Poor you.
Compare cabin crew: work twice as hard, earn peanuts and get an extra 7 days off in the year for free. I wouldn't whine to them, you may get a little something extra in your coffee next time.
In the biggest global financial crisis for many years, you lost 2.8 days salary. Stop worrying about everybody else.
Clowns.

Kurtis Chukle Willis 11th March 2010 04:48

Divide and conquer !!! This has always been Cathay's ploy, if you haven't figured that out by now. Look after one group and screw the other. That way we spend our time in fighting instead of dealing with them. Look back over time and this is how they have always done it. Anyhow, I get my full 3 weeks back so.......... I'm alright Jack.

Five Green 11th March 2010 06:17

Kcw:

Don't see this as divide and conquer. We are not voting on this. We are not being told to accept the Captain's screwing over in order to get our full 100%. No I think all flight crew would agree this is wrong.

This is just stupid management. In a twisted way they may even have been trying to show that the upper management was willing to forgo some of the SLS payback.

Instead they have pissed the very crew off who do a large amount of Company ass covering by extending into discretion, working G days, answering the phone etc.

I for one think this is a bizarre way to handle your most senior crew...

FG

water check 11th March 2010 08:50

fO4EVA....one post eh? I suggest you crawl back in your hole. I don't recall saying I was going to mention it to the cabin crew. I was simply stating that there doesn't seem to be much sense in giving back only 90%, when all other groups received 100%. Of course, you were too frantic in registering on Pprune so you could have a go at someone, completely missing the point of the comment in the first place. In case it hasn't occurred to you, the money in question is my basic salary. I don't have to justify it to you or anyone else for that matter. As far as the 'biggest financial crisis in years'....CX declared a 4 BILLION dollar profit. I think another 10% could have been 'scraped' out...don't you? Why don't you de-register and go and join a wannabe forum, you may just qualify for that.

Ex Cathedra 11th March 2010 09:21


Don't see this as divide and conquer. We are not voting on this.
It is.
CX divided the pilot body. Captains will be pissed, but the rest of the pilots will not go out of the way to defend them since they've gotten RA65 and everybody's upgrade was conscequently delayed.

And by shafting the capts, they save the most money.

FO4EVA 11th March 2010 11:12

Fine, whatever.
Would you agree that if Level D staff got 100% sls back then they would have gained the most? Ie 4 free weeks?
How do YOU think that would look to the majority of level A-C staff?

Dan Winterland 11th March 2010 14:21

But it won't stop F/Os wanting to be one!

snoopy99 11th March 2010 14:28

I challenge CX to give the 10 % to the Sunnyside club.

colts19 11th March 2010 19:01

So agree!!! 2.8 days for 4 weeks off in the largest financial downturn since the great depression...Get some F@#$%&! reality here.

Glass Half Empty 11th March 2010 21:34

you are missing the point completely. 100% for all or 90% for all not a selective issue as it is here.

404 Titan 12th March 2010 00:49

FO4EVA is a troll.

I little maths lesson for Mr Troll:

-1+1=0
-2+2=0
-3+3=0
-4+3.6≠0

And yes Mr Troll, I am a SFO.

SMOC 12th March 2010 01:55

It gets worse!

Unpaid leave was offered before SLS, those who took UNPAID leave didn't have to sign up for SLS.

So guess what if you took unpaid leave you get $0 , only those who signed up for SLS get it back :eek: beside the 90%ers :ugh:

Cabin crew are fuming as apparently a lot signed for unpaid leave to help the company out as opposed to SLS.

How many cockpit crew did the same? :sad:

"CX, striving to have the lowest morals of any company out there" :D

FO4EVA 12th March 2010 01:58

or another way:
1 extra weeks leave
2 extra weeks leave
3 extra weeks leave
3.6 extra weeks leave, lose 2.8 days pay.

Who got the best deal there??? Level C perhaps? Or Level D? Sure as hell wasn't Level A.
If all you people could pay 3 days salary for 4 weeks leave would you???? I know I sure as sh!t would.
I think it was more unfair that level D had to take more UPL in the first place....

Maybe I'm just not as negative as you.
edit: oooooo a SFO

cxshareholder 12th March 2010 02:14

This is just so exciting. Thankyou Tony, you're ways of abusing the minions are wonderful. I often feel my dividends rising with every divisive word that you speak.

Nurse the screens and the kleenex at once!

Ooooooooooooh yyyyeeesssssss......:uhoh:


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.