Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Smaller aircraft on the horizon PERHAPS

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Smaller aircraft on the horizon PERHAPS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Oct 2020, 00:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: hong kong
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smaller aircraft on the horizon PERHAPS

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...craft-business
cannot is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 02:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That article makes it sound like a decision is a long way off. So I suppose a decision is indeed imminent.
Bangaluru is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 03:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Danny over at SCMP grasping at straws. The Cathay Group has many irons in fires and it would not be surprising if some or all would be sold or hived off ( if anyone would buy them ). Qatar is flush with cash and will be watching the 293 share price. A quick and inexpensive entry into the China SE Asia market. Two Qatari executive G650's visiting HKIA over the weekend. Gone now.

PS Don't tell Danny.
unitedabx is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 03:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Great White North of the 49th
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The article sounds like the decision is already made, not a long way off. I’m thinking smaller aircraft like ATR’s, Dash, etc will be in the works while the big jets will be sold off to the highest bidder. Cargo is the only operations keeping CX going at the moment.

With Chek Lap Kok passenger numbers at 1-2% of previous volumes it’s the hardest hit airport in the world. COVId is only a small part of that problem. The geopolitical situation has already sealed the City’s fate and the airline is following suite.

I’m af raid Cathay and HK will never be the same. The jewel of SE Asia and the plum of Airline operations worldwide are gone. I’m thinking CX will be the modern day PanAm.
Drc40 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 03:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
I’m thinking smaller aircraft like ATR’s, Dash, etc will be in the works
787/350s instead of the 777-300X more like.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 04:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drc40
The article sounds like the decision is already made, not a long way off. I’m thinking smaller aircraft like ATR’s, Dash, etc will be in the works while the big jets will be sold off to the highest bidder. Cargo is the only operations keeping CX going at the moment.

With Chek Lap Kok passenger numbers at 1-2% of previous volumes it’s the hardest hit airport in the world. COVId is only a small part of that problem. The geopolitical situation has already sealed the City’s fate and the airline is following suite.

I’m af raid Cathay and HK will never be the same. The jewel of SE Asia and the plum of Airline operations worldwide are gone. I’m thinking CX will be the modern day PanAm.
Maybe the long sleeved senior fleeters (are there any left?) can be repurposed onto a Q400 for a quick 2hr30min flight to Taipei at FL230.
Bangaluru is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 04:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: one country, one system
Age: 55
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see the logic behind the argument for (much) smaller aircraft, beside possibly the lack of funds to pay for them.

Either we have a vaccine/quick test or we don't.

As Dan said, maybe a downgrade from 777 to A350 or 787, so still a wide body and hardly "small".

DRC, nothing will ever be the same. Additionally, you are confusing civil rights with the economy. Asia will be the primary growth market of the aviation industry for decades to come, and Hong Kong will not only survive this, but remain one of the most prosperous cities of the region.

Last edited by Sam Ting Wong; 6th Oct 2020 at 04:32.
Sam Ting Wong is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 04:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: The Forbidden City
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SIZE does MATTER - in this case
Curry Lamb is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 04:35
  #9 (permalink)  
Rie
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bangaluru
Maybe the long sleeved senior fleeters (are there any left?) can be repurposed onto a Q400 for a quick 2hr30min flight to Taipei at FL230.
Vomit Comets from May to October each year...

The group now has a large number of smaller planes already. 320 and 321neos can easily be positioned under any of the AOCs

It is just another Danny article anyway... grain of salt
Rie is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 04:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Great White North of the 49th
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sam Ting Wong
I don't see the logic behind the argument for (much) smaller aircraft, beside possibly the lack of funds to pay for them.

Either we have a vaccine/quick test or we don't.

As Dan said, maybe a downgrade from 777 to A350 or 787, so still a wide body and hardly "small".

DRC, nothing will ever be the same. Additionally, you are confusing civil rights with the economy. Asia will be the primary growth market of the aviation industry for decades to come, and Hong Kong will not only survive this, but remain one of the most prosperous cities of the region.
Don’t believe you. Hong Kong is in the bullseye of the chicomms. They will do just enough to let HK’ers feel sort of OK but never let them fully prosper as in the part. HK has already suffered immeasurable financial and quality of life losses that will never be regained. There is nothing you can point too disputing that fact. Forget civil rights, HK’ers will be assimilated into the Beijing chicomm vision and it’s already WELL underway. I hope everyone gets the hell out ASAP. Take your money and property because Xi is already looking for more storage units to pack it all away.
Drc40 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 05:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Winterland
787/350s instead of the 777-300X more like.
No such thing as the 777-300X, I presume you meant the 777-9 or 777-8?
Get.over.it is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 05:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,536
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
Airlines which already have the A320/1 and B787 in their fleet seem to be using them in preference to larger aircraft. Easier to fill and cheap to operate, with little if any premium cabin flying around unused.

EK got badly caught out with only the B777 and A380, QR not so much with smaller to medium types available.

Last edited by krismiler; 6th Oct 2020 at 07:53.
krismiler is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 06:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Another plane
Age: 46
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A220, A321LR , 787, and A350 seem the aircraft of choice in this new normal. Easier to fill to max ZFW and make a precious operating profit.

777X too big and too expensive to buy, especially in this current low fuel price era.
Suvarnabhumi is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 07:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: The Forbidden City
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suvarnabhumi
The A220, A321LR , 787, and A350 seem the aircraft of choice in this new normal. Easier to fill to max ZFW and make a precious operating profit.

777X too big and too expensive to buy, especially in this current low fuel price era.
And don’t forget the “A50” - great aircraft for “Catfay Paciic”



Curry Lamb is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 08:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you can't get the little details right...
OK4Wire is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 10:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rie
Vomit Comets from May to October each year...

The group now has a large number of smaller planes already. 320 and 321neos can easily be positioned under any of the AOCs

It is just another Danny article anyway... grain of salt
there would be no need to reposition anything, just down scale the wide body operation.
fly1981 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 14:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cloudcuckooland
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If HKG was "just another city in China" then there would be a booming domestic travel market and CX/KA would actually be semi busy.
1200firm is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2020, 18:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: The Forbidden City
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wrong! The hordes from up north are not welcome in the territory, locals have made that abundantly clear in the past. “Domestic” travel is dead, international travel ain’t gonna happen anytime soon.
Only saving grace is transit pax, and some cargo flights that keeps the circus on the road - for now.
Curry Lamb is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 01:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 616
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Maybe NR should have ordered those 777F planes

AQIS Boigu is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2020, 02:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cx groups recovery will be lead by China, Following that, Asia in general. Initially narrow bodies will make sense but not long term, as the capability for the majority of cx’s network is not there. I imagine the article refers to smaller wide bodies.
fly1981 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.