Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Airlines Reaction to COVID 19

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Airlines Reaction to COVID 19

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Apr 2020, 02:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: HKG
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dragon Pacific
That’s right and HKG in particular has done fantastically well with only one new case yesterday and that was imported.
The big problem now is how do we open our border and start flying again. No one is suggesting a solution yet, it is all supposition and guesswork.
Oz base now on 50% pay. What is their next move with the rest of us?

Accurate and fast testing as part of checkin
Accurate and fast testing on arrival
Smart phone contact tracking
Adequate medical resources to manage the flow of new cases
Improved medication to assist the sick
Normalisation of a level of virus death

All of these areas are rapidly evolving.

For us: 1/2 pay Aussi, 20% pay cut Canada and USA. Considering what the Aussi Stand Down provisions allow for it could be a lot worse. Considered the cash reserves CX has, it could also be a lot better.
controlledrest is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 03:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by main_dog
Humanity (and specifically Asia) definitely needs to clean up its act re wildlife markets. Not forgetting that many recent epidemics arose elsewhere (Marburg/Ebola in Africa, Swine flu in the US, MERS in Saudi).

To be fair though, half of the world’s population is Asian and they tend to be more densely populated countries, stands to reason that a good half of new human diseases should spring up here.
Firstly, swine flu’s origin was Mexico, not US.

Second, you might be forgetting the Asian flu, Hong Kong flu, Avian (bird) flu, and SARS (the other corona virus). You are correct though, wildlife markets ought to be made illegal in all countries, and most especially in China which is attempting “superpower” status.

For clarity though, there is compelling evidence that COVID-19 escaped from one of the two virology labs in Wuhan. It was not from the wet market, as there were no horseshoe bats there or nearby and many of the first infected had no connection to the wet market. That is a coverup lie propagated by the ChiComs, and eagerly gobbled up by their surrogates in the media.

As for high density populations in Asia, all the more reason to clean up the hygiene standards in the food markets. It’s one thing when a country is poor, it is something else when people decide to be disgusting.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 04:01
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cxorcist
Firstly, swine flu’s origin was Mexico, not US.

Second, you might be forgetting the Asian flu, Hong Kong flu, Avian (bird) flu, and SARS (the other corona virus). You are correct though, wildlife markets ought to be made illegal in all countries, and most especially in China which is attempting “superpower” status.

For clarity though, there is compelling evidence that COVID-19 escaped from one of the two virology labs in Wuhan. It was not from the wet market, as there were no horseshoe bats there or nearby and many of the first infected had no connection to the wet market. That is a coverup lie propagated by the ChiComs, and eagerly gobbled up by their surrogates in the media.

As for high density populations in Asia, all the more reason to clean up the hygiene standards in the food markets. It’s one thing when a country is poor, it is something else when people decide to be disgusting.
From New Scientist:

The virus’s genome has been sequenced, and if it had been altered, we would expect to see signs of inserted gene sequences. But we now know the points that differ from bat viruses are scattered in a fairly random way, just as they would be if the new virus had evolved naturally.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/term/co...#ixzz6Jq5akj9c
AllWobbly is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 04:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AllWobbly
From New Scientist:

The virus’s genome has been sequenced, and if it had been altered, we would expect to see signs of inserted gene sequences. But we now know the points that differ from bat viruses are scattered in a fairly random way, just as they would be if the new virus had evolved naturally.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/term/co...#ixzz6Jq5akj9c
I never wrote that the virus had inserted sequencing or is a bio-weapon. That doesn’t mean it didn’t escape from a lab where the ChiComs study corona viruses, perhaps for legitimate research purposes, and specifically from horseshoe bats. Don’t confuse it not being a manmade weapon from the likelihood that a naturally occurring corona virus escaped due to shoddy safety protocols.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 04:32
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cxorcist
I never wrote that the virus had inserted sequencing or is a bio-weapon. That doesn’t mean it didn’t escape from a lab where the ChiComs study corona viruses, perhaps for legitimate research purposes, and specifically from horseshoe bats. Don’t confuse it not being a manmade weapon from the likelihood that a naturally occurring corona virus escaped due to shoddy safety protocols.
Point taken. However this particular virus closely resembles those found in bats and pangolins and has not been (previously) the focus of study because of its lack of impact on humans.

Most of the “hypotheses” re viral escape are from the US. I take anything that can be used as political capital with a big pinch of salt.
Also with their history re id seriously doubt if they didnt have their act sorted.
AllWobbly is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 04:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AllWobbly
Point taken. However this particular virus closely resembles those found in bats and pangolins and has not been (previously) the focus of study because of its lack of impact on humans.

Most of the “hypotheses” re viral escape are from the US. I take anything that can be used as political capital with a big pinch of salt.
Also with their history re id seriously doubt if they didnt have their act sorted.
The pangolin is part of the wet market lie. This virus originated from a horseshoe bat. Even Chinese university researchers acknowledge this to be true with 97-98% certainty. We also know that horseshoe bats don’t live anywhere remotely close to Wuhan but several hundred miles to the west. These bats are known to be studied at the P4 virology lab in Wuhan, but not sold at the Wuhan wet market. What is not known is how the virus got from the bat to humans, and whether or not there was an intermediate species between the two. However, the likelihood of this species being a pangolin which is sold at the wet market is almost zero. Keep in mind that more than a third of the first 50 cases had no (zero) connection to the wet market.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 06:17
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Krug departure, Merlot transition
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-res...-pandemic.html

The 2009 Swine Flu was first detected in the US, although yes there is speculation that it may have originated across the border. It may just be that the US had the technical capacity and epidemiological nous to detect it first.

Anyway Mexico/US/China/Saudi or Africa, it doesn’t really matter: finger-pointing is not constructive unless you’re a politician trying to defend your job (after spectacularly dropping the ball). Learning from previous crises to avoid or contain the next is key, like HKG did by learning after SARS.
main_dog is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 06:17
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Rabbit Hutch
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind the Pangolins. Why did The NA pilots get 80% of pay and the Oz mates 50%? Must be a story there.
Dragon Pacific is online now  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 06:44
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding is that 20% was the max allowable under the UK Govt Income recovery rules. Anyone with other info to confirm or to the contrary? I hear the NA bases are about to be contacted next.
mngmt mole is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 12:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by main_dog
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-res...-pandemic.html

The 2009 Swine Flu was first detected in the US, although yes there is speculation that it may have originated across the border. It may just be that the US had the technical capacity and epidemiological nous to detect it first.

Anyway Mexico/US/China/Saudi or Africa, it doesn’t really matter: finger-pointing is not constructive unless you’re a politician trying to defend your job (after spectacularly dropping the ball). Learning from previous crises to avoid or contain the next is key, like HKG did by learning after SARS.
Actually, it does matter. When the country of origin, China in this case, denies the virus’ transmissibility long after knowing otherwise, there is a problem, most especially when it causes many tens of thousands of deaths and trillions in economic damage. China knew it was passing human to human. They lied about it for weeks, if not months, and silenced those who tried to say otherwise, and then exported the virus to the rest of the world from Wuhan by the thousands during New Year festivities while simultaneously locking down their own country. They were even willing to call the American travel ban on China “xenophobic”, knowing full well that the virus was spreading around the world like wildfire from Wuhan.

Sorry, but that’s huge. China’s actions will become known and exposed eventually. The truth has a sneaky way of finding its way into the light eventually. If the rest of the world is brave enough to hold China accountable, then their economy is finished, and CX with it.

At that point, it won’t matter whether you’re on 50% or 80% pay. Business as usual is a long ways off, if it ever returns. Ideally, HK would be catapulting itself back into the arms of the West, but that ship has already sailed.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 13:02
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mngmt mole
My understanding is that 20% was the max allowable under the UK Govt Income recovery rules. Anyone with other info to confirm or to the contrary? I hear the NA bases are about to be contacted next.
Uh, they were contacted weeks ago. Where have you been hiding?
cxorcist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 13:57
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Krug departure, Merlot transition
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, but that’s huge. China’s actions will become known and exposed eventually. The truth has a sneaky way of finding its way into the light eventually. If the rest of the world is brave enough to hold China accountable, then their economy is finished, and CX with it.
I wouldn’t want to get in the way of a good conspiracy theory, and there is little doubt they did lose some precious time, a few weeks at least.

The virus first appeared at the very end of November/beginning December. It is a matter of public record the WHO was officially informed by the 31st of December, and by the first week of January Chinese scientists had also sequenced it and revealed it to be a novel form of coronavirus, transmissible from human to human.

Since early January then, the ball has been in our court, and frankly, as western countries we’ve generally not done too well. While HKG, Macao and Taiwan reacted immediately (as in, beginning January) by tightening screening and imposing isolation on travelers from the affected areas, as late as end-February some western heads of state were still downplaying the risks and failing to prepare.

It’s more immediately satisfying (and career-serving for our politicians) to point fingers, blame others and absolve ourselves, but it would be more useful to look to countries that have successfully dealt with the issue before us (think S Korea) and try to mimic their methods (namely aggressive testing and contact tracing).

This is the only rational course of action, and the one that would save most lives (not to mention jobs) in the long run. So I won’t hold my breath.
main_dog is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 14:17
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don’t confuse your history, main dog. China and the WHO were telling the world there was no human to human transmission throughout most of January.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 02:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: HK-CRoC
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Redundancy

Originally Posted by Dragon Pacific
That’s right and HKG in particular has done fantastically well with only one new case yesterday and that was imported.
The big problem now is how do we open our border and start flying again. No one is suggesting a solution yet, it is all supposition and guesswork.
Oz base now on 50% pay. What is their next move with the rest of us?

Clever way around reverse seniority eh !!
Flex88 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.