Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Show me the money

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Show me the money

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jul 2017, 22:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: HKG
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Show me the money

I have seen no evidence whatsoever of the company being in financial trouble, therefore I see no need for any concessions.

The fuel hedge will pass, then margins will improve.

The pressure on airfares from HKA will pass, sooner or later they will have to raise their fares to provide a return on investment.

The office staff redundancies were over due. Too many people pushing paper in circles not achieving anything. An incredibly poorly managed company with inept staff following dumb policies.


This is what I want to know:


Who was the fuel hedge with?

Did any company associated with Swire make money on the fuel hedge?

Is it true that the Swire owned company HAECO charges CX three times what they charge other carriers for a turn around, and HAS charges $1800 for a bus trip to the airport?

If it wasn't for the fuel hedge, cargo price fixing fines and transfer pricing, what would the CX profit/loss be?

Did the managers in the chain of command who approved the fuel hedge and the illegal cargo price fixing receive performance bonuses? How much? Why?
controlledrest is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 00:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Almost 6ft under
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all smoke and mirror. Typical Honky management style. Give them nothing, boyz and gals. The company is not going to sink.
Sea Eggs is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 02:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dan has got it right. All we hear about is the amount of money that CX is losing.

But then they go and purchase 40% of an associated airline!! Spending money like drunken sailors.

Honestly, these people are so full of S*#T it's not funny. It's the expectation management style that always comes out during negotiations. I can't wait until the announcement that HPE has failed because the Union wouldn't submit to all of their demands. It's all the pilot's fault!

New contract anyone?!
Some How I'm Tired is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 04:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In all my years in CX, I have never gone wrong by assuming the truth is exactly the opposite of what management is telling me. And i'm not kidding.
Trafalgar is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 05:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: HK-CRoC
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ControlledRest

Haeco, Haesl, Cathay Catering, HAS, etc. ALL simply a legal method to suck cash out of a very profitable company. At the end of every year - no profit to trigger profit sharing. BS. Profit sharing from all those companies go to Directors, GM's and up. Just not the people who make it happen..

Fuel Hedge may very well be one of the above.... you decide
Flex88 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 07:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: VHHH Ocean 2D
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rod,

Seems like you flew with Sam Ting Wong?

I guess I was wrong in thinking who the real STW is.
betpump5 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 07:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a great post CR. Many other items we could add to that list. You make a great point: why does the AOA not properly educate new joiners about the history of this company? We need a properly written precise of the history, particularly since the early 90's, clearly and concisely laying out all the deception, intimidation, threats, attacks and fiascos. This management is not fit for purpose, and is still in place undermining and devaluing the careers of those here now, and those to come. Without a proper understanding of what happened over the past 25 years, the new generation begins to accept the current dysfunction as 'normal'. Once that becomes the accepted narrative, all is truly lost. AOA, get someone to draw up a document that clearly lays out the past, and how egregious our managements actions have been. We can't allow ignorance to replace witness and testimony to history. Everyone in this company needs to know the truth, and the nature of the 'beast'.
Trafalgar is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 07:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: hong kong
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CR looks like you have flown with Adelaide GS's son. Sounds exactly like the conversation i had with him, absolutely no clue apart from the the company is the best. Apple hasn't fallen far from the tree
kiwicx is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 12:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think rising competition is an issue. But it is more a issue for the airlines than the crews. Especially if the trend of paying decently for a few extra crew continues (China contracts)

The ultimate end game will be like the US. Consolidation to a few companies, that control the market well enough to pay reasonably and make a profit.
Freehills is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 13:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hugo Peroni the IV
Give the poor chap a break....his Dad can't remember any of that list happening so how would you expect his son to know?
cause he snorted too much?
Scoreboard is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 14:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: hongkong
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
PLease explain to me how, that in the historical years, when fuel was at $80 and way above..the airline managed to make billions in profits? Yet now by simple comparison to other airlines paying less for their fuel we managed a paltry income?.
Surely such comparisons are irrelevant. Imagine fuel at $85/barrel for the last 10 years straight...you're telling me every year would have incurred a loss?...BS.
I've seen spot fuel at $150+ and still we were in the black and handsomely.
BlunderBus is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 11:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: hongkong
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One simple question..let's be transparent about the fuel hedging.
Who was on the other end of the swap? Let's hear it.
I was wondering if any company diverted funds when the staff have a contractual profit sharing formula..wouldn't that be fraud?
BlunderBus is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 14:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: everywhere
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
It's only fraud if you get caught.
flyhardmo is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 15:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Cesspit
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlunderBus
One simple question..let's be transparent about the fuel hedging.
Who was on the other end of the swap? Let's hear it.
I was wondering if any company diverted funds when the staff have a contractual profit sharing formula..wouldn't that be fraud?

The staff profit sharing is spare change compared to the real laundering.

This place is a modern day Enron. A minor share holder with total management control awarding contracts and diverting money to companies that management own 100 percent of. Good work if you can get it. Ken Lay would be proud.

They don't even try to hide the scam. Senior CX management are paid bonuses based upon Swire's profits, not Cathay's.
Progress Wanchai is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 15:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: U/S
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would any of us expect anything other than shady dealings?

It's all these people know.
Average Fool is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 18:34
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eventually we all end as dust, and so will the Swires. The difference will come in the accounting afterwards. The meek shall inherit... There is a time and place for everything to be accounted for. They may think they are accomplishing one of the great business cons of all time. If only they knew. Yes, this place is malignant, corrupt and a corporate misery. Just be glad you do an honourable job and represent an honourable profession. Be glad you are not one of the non-pilot management, for there surely is evidence of all that is horrible within the realm of humanity.
Trafalgar is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 20:15
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think the pilot management are just as bad.
BusyB is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2017, 01:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: HK-CRoC
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PW n all

Originally Posted by Progress Wanchai
The staff profit sharing is spare change compared to the real laundering.

This place is a modern day Enron. A minor share holder with total management control awarding contracts and diverting money to companies that management own 100 percent of. Good work if you can get it. Ken Lay would be proud.

They don't even try to hide the scam. Senior CX management are paid bonuses based upon Swire's profits, not Cathay's.
The above - Swires would call this "Capitalism with Asian Values"
Flex88 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2017, 06:42
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Far East
Age: 36
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlunderBus
PLease explain to me how, that in the historical years, when fuel was at $80 and way above..the airline managed to make billions in profits? Yet now by simple comparison to other airlines paying less for their fuel we managed a paltry income?.
Surely such comparisons are irrelevant. Imagine fuel at $85/barrel for the last 10 years straight...you're telling me every year would have incurred a loss?...BS.
I've seen spot fuel at $150+ and still we were in the black and handsomely.
The Key is the fuel surcharge. Back in 2013 ~ 2014 CX charged more than 10% of ticket price for fuel surcharge. That's a whooping $1000 dollar each way for long hauls.

Hence the revenue and yield drop last year as all fuel surcharge were cancelled.
Howtosayit is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2017, 06:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Far East
Age: 36
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flex88
Haeco, Haesl, Cathay Catering, HAS, etc. ALL simply a legal method to suck cash out of a very profitable company. At the end of every year - no profit to trigger profit sharing. BS. Profit sharing from all those companies go to Directors, GM's and up. Just not the people who make it happen..

Fuel Hedge may very well be one of the above.... you decide
Though I'd agree CX's situation is not as dire as it claims, this is far from the truth. CX reports their P/L as a whole Cathay Pacific group which includes HAECO, Catheting, vogue etc. The money made by these associates have been included in the final results.

If you look at its core business (I.e. Flying) the loss is even greater. Of coz mostly because of the fuel hedging .
Howtosayit is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.