Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Karachi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th June 2014 | 12:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Jzt
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Hong kong
Karachi

Thank Allah,
one less hell hole to visit.
let the sunnis/!!!!e sort it out
Jzt is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2014 | 13:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Here
And the reason??? COMMERCIAL REASONS!!!! Not ONE mention of security or safety in the article. Not one. I wonder if the attack had not happened, would we still be flying there??? Safety is our priority.....
crwkunt roll is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2014 | 15:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Asia
777300ER is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2014 | 17:42
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 47
From: Asia
The ZFW's have always been pretty high...maybe it is safety...
AQIS Boigu is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2014 | 19:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
What really irritates me is them stating so adamantly that is was a commercial decision. What rubbish. We know it, they know it, so why lie.... Hmmm, on second thought...
dartman748 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2014 | 23:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 180
Likes: 2
From: At Home
Every thing about the culture of this airline promotes lying. From the propaganda they spew regularly, to the CP's telling people that to get time off to call out sick. Its disappointing that an organization such as this promotes such a practice.
I'mbatman is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 00:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
It was sort of commercial. They were operating double cabin on the bkk-khi due ftls. Then comes the attacks and bombs.....well that scuttles us slipping crew ......so lets just pull the pin.
Scoreboard is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 07:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Here ---> X
Oh, come one now. They can't just come up and say they care about their employees...

You wouldn't want the shareholders to think that the revenue potential has been lost just because those pesky employees could be kidnapped or killed?

Yonosoy Marinero is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 10:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: hk
Taliban Warning

I think you will find the warning given by the Taliban in Pakistan, for all foreign companies in Pakistan to leave immediately or face being targeted, might have something to do with it.
PanZa-Lead is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 11:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
I for one will not miss going to KHI....!!!! trip!
Frogman1484 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 12:22
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 16
From: GC Paradise
The potential to lose an airliner, crew and passengers is not a good way to run a business.

Some would see it as a commercial decision while others would see it as a security decision...the same outcome in this case...folks have different human values which determine their primary outlook to place decisions primarily on either business or empathy.

Your job is to protect crew and passengers regardless of other outcomes.

Management's job is to make money regardless of other outcomes.

Don't expect the two jobs to be always coincident in decision making...
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 12:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: HKG
Wouldn't be anything to do with crew shortage of course
BusyB is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 12:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Compared to the 777 & jumbo, the airbus isn't really that short of crew.
broadband circuit is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 13:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: MOON
Perhaps the insurance company offered to continue the policy with a increase rates. It certainly wasn't any care they had for us, or the passengers. We only do things for money here.

Not People. Not Safety.

Money.
twotigers is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 13:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Smogsville
The potential to lose an airliner, crew and passengers is not a good way to run a business.
Particularly when the insurance coverage is bugger all!
SMOC is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 14:11
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, Suffolk
Gentlemen, you work for a company that is managed by a company that told everyone that its ships were no longer calling at Shanghai during the Cultural Revolution because "there wasn't any cargo", i.e. "commercial reasons"

The real reason was that the second officer (the navigating officer on a merchant ship) on a Blue Funnel ship had ignored the Pilot's instructions and, in accordance with SOP, plotted her positions. His notes were discovered when the ship was searched by the Red Guards, and it was six years before his employers, with a lot of help from your employers, were able to retrieve what remained of him him from the gulag.

Please give your employers some credit for knowing what to say and do in such situations; they have been at it since 1863..

Last edited by Methersgate; 17th June 2014 at 14:53.
Methersgate is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 14:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: HKG
You mean selling Opium. Not allowed to do that and many other profitable things these days.
BusyB is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 15:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, Suffolk
No, I do not!

The people who ran foreign mud into China were the Princely Hong, once associated with BOAC.

You work for the Great and Ancient Hong: Cotton, yes, tea, yes, and both of them on a huge scale now, but never, ever, opium or any other illicit substances, neither grown, nor traded, nor carried.
Methersgate is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 15:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: HKG
OK, I'll retract that but I think it was wood oil and salt originally.
BusyB is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2014 | 15:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, Suffolk
Right on the wood oil, but I think it may have been soya bean cake, not salt.

Actually, if you have an idle moment, "John Swire, the Senior" is a good book and could serve as a handbook on how to set up and run any transport business, even today...

sample quotes:

"I write as I speak: to the point."

"The immediate crisis over, John Swire went back to his favourite pastime; drawing up his competitors' balance sheets."

He was originally a cotton merchant; he hitched a lift to Shanghai, in 1867, on one of Alfred Holt's revolutionary compound expansion steamers because he thought that the shortage of cotton due to the Union blockade of the Confederacy might be made up by importing from China. He found that he was wrong about that, but wrote to Holt saying his Shanghai agents were useless and he could do a better job: he was appointed and he did. He founded the China Navigation Company, with Holt as a shareholder, "for the carriage of passengers, troops, baggage mails and goods by land, sea and AIR" (!) in 1872.

Last edited by Methersgate; 24th June 2014 at 14:50.
Methersgate is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.