Transition Level
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 2
From: nowhere
Transition Level
Is there a particular reason why there are two different transition levels in HKG depending on altimeter setting. Most other places seem to have one level such as Japan, Philippines etc.
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Disneyland - with Mickey Mouse
Some astronaut Cathay Pathetic senior C&T Captain will give you the "only right" answer to your curios question.
My humble answer would be; Hong Kong, as you know, used to be a POM Colony and as we all know, and as demonstrated by the Cathay Pathetic MNGM, they know "better". Why make it simple when you can make it hard.
Good luck with it!
My humble answer would be; Hong Kong, as you know, used to be a POM Colony and as we all know, and as demonstrated by the Cathay Pathetic MNGM, they know "better". Why make it simple when you can make it hard.
Good luck with it!

Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 285
From: Moved beyond
The TL is FL110 with QNH 980 or above, FL120 with QNH 979 or below. It's to maintain a vertical separation of at least 1000ft between aircraft using QNH and those using QNE (1013) when the QNH is very low, eg during the passage of a typhoon.
If you recall, a pressure difference of 1 hPa is approx 30ft. Ergo, if the QNH is 980, the vertical separation between an aircraft at the TL and one at the TA is 2000 ft - [(1013 - 980) hPa x 30 ft/hPa] = 1000 ft (approx). If the QNH is less than 980, the separation between an aircraft at 9,000 ft on QNH and one at FL110 on QNE would be less than 1,000 ft. Hence a higher TL is used when the QNH is very low.
Fall foul of the system did we Yeager?? Can't say I'm surprised.
PS. FWIW, I'm not an STC, or an astronaut...
If you recall, a pressure difference of 1 hPa is approx 30ft. Ergo, if the QNH is 980, the vertical separation between an aircraft at the TL and one at the TA is 2000 ft - [(1013 - 980) hPa x 30 ft/hPa] = 1000 ft (approx). If the QNH is less than 980, the separation between an aircraft at 9,000 ft on QNH and one at FL110 on QNE would be less than 1,000 ft. Hence a higher TL is used when the QNH is very low.
Fall foul of the system did we Yeager?? Can't say I'm surprised.
PS. FWIW, I'm not an STC, or an astronaut...
Last edited by BuzzBox; 7th August 2013 at 12:23.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 2
From: nowhere
The TL is FL110 with QNH 980 or above, FL120 with QNH 979 or below. It's to maintain a vertical separation of at least 1000ft between aircraft using QNH and those using QNE (1013) when the QNH is very low, eg during the passage of a typhoon.
If you recall, a pressure difference of 1 hPa is approx 30ft. Ergo, if the QNH is 980, the vertical separation between an aircraft at the TL and one at the TA is (1013 - 980) hPa x 30 ft/hPa = 1000 ft (approx). If the QNH is less than 980, the separation between an aircraft at 9,000 ft on QNH and one at FL110 on QNE would be less than 1,000 ft. Hence a higher TL is used when the QNH is very low.
If you recall, a pressure difference of 1 hPa is approx 30ft. Ergo, if the QNH is 980, the vertical separation between an aircraft at the TL and one at the TA is (1013 - 980) hPa x 30 ft/hPa = 1000 ft (approx). If the QNH is less than 980, the separation between an aircraft at 9,000 ft on QNH and one at FL110 on QNE would be less than 1,000 ft. Hence a higher TL is used when the QNH is very low.
I'm just curious why the more complicated procedure instead of the straight forward single transition level that is used in much of the world.
As we all know...FL 180 in North America is the transition level, if the altimeter is below standard, then FL 170 not available from ATC. I'm sure both methods achieve the same thing.
Or the Philippines which has a space between the transition level and altitude like Hong Kong but still only uses FL130 for transition level.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Buzzbox beat me to it, he is correct. The difference between HKG and other ATCCs is that they will take into account the low local QNH and simply not assign a low FL that would create a loss of vertical separation. All transparent to flight crew and with less risk.
I can just imagine a situation in HKG with a weak typhoon, low QNHs, saturated airspace and a few non-local crew missing that little gem of a note.
I can just imagine a situation in HKG with a weak typhoon, low QNHs, saturated airspace and a few non-local crew missing that little gem of a note.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Code:
So the point remains: Why do they do it the hard way instead of the easy way? One guess!
Last edited by Absolutely Fabulous; 6th August 2013 at 04:09.
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Not in a Bus
Refer to Buzzbox for the facts. Of course we could just use FL120 all the time but then we'd lose 1000' (or arguably, with 2 way traffic, 2000') of manoeuvring space in the terminal area. If you think that would be "progress" suggest it and continue battering away on the keyboard without thinking. Or am I being "Silly"?
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: UK
I don't really see how this affects flight crew in practise. If it is a sub 980 day your flight will not get cleared to a lower FL than 120 .... in which case you would stay on STD regardless of high/low pressure. Then when you are cleared to 9000' or below you 'transition'. The only difference between this and how LHR do it is that HK bothered to write their procedure on the plate; LHR do it seamlessly in the background .... same system.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
White None
Correct. Commendably self-aware. You must work on your sillyness and avoid the entirely reasonable, measured posts you keep ruining FH with - enough now, treat yourself, join in with a little tantrum. 
STP
Or am I being "Silly"?
STP





