Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

CX PLEAD GUILTY AGAIN

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

CX PLEAD GUILTY AGAIN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2013, 07:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry CX PLEAD GUILTY AGAIN

Just been sent this from a mate in Canada. It can't be true can it? Cathay would never behave like this.

Cathay Pacific Airlines has pleaded guilty to conspiring with other airlines to fix the prices of navigation surcharges on cargo flown to and from Canada, the Competition Bureau announced Thursday.

The airline was fined $1.5 million for its participation in the price-fixing scheme, which occurred between 1999 and 2003.

Seven other airlines have already pleaded guilty to participating in the scheme: Cargolux, Air France, KLM, Martinair, Qantas, British Airways, and Korean Air.

The bureau said the investigation has netted $24 million in fines to date and is ongoing.

"These types of agreements represent one of the most egregious forms of anti-competitive behaviour," said competition commissioner John Pecman.

Under the Competition Act, price fixing carries a maximum penalty of $25 million and/or 14 years in prison, but the air cargo case was prosecuted under older provisions that allow for a maximum fine of $10 million and/or five years in prison.

The bureau said it learned of the price fixing scheme through companies that came forward under the agency's immunity and leniency programs, which lessen the criminal liability of those who reveal information about wrongdoing and co-operate with the bureau's investigation.
AnAmusedReader is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2013, 15:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: heads down trying to figure out Chinese RVSM
Posts: 200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That explains that propaganda posted by the COO last week

Hellenic aviator is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 11:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forget the fine

Forget the fine why not go for the second option?
joblow is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2013, 03:47
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forget the second option

ask yourself why no CX executive ever gets disciplined? They break the law, they break the company's own codes yet they carry on in their jobs, or get a sideways, but nothing else. What if your actions at work resulted in even a few dollars unnecessary costs, let alone millions?
AnAmusedReader is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2013, 04:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Downunda
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Caring is sharing

CX is actually a caring employer. Anything done by management ultimately is done for the benefit of the entire airline. So if they did something dodgy, it is for everyone's good, hence it is strange that any staff member would think anything otherwise. A mistake here or an oversight there is not such a big issue, please cut senior management a break.

'With responsibility comes accountability'
004wercras is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.